What a great question

[Truth Detector]

Trump may not have been a Russian agent (duh) but the report did find that he tried to collude with the Russian government. He failed, because he's a retard, but he tried, which is what matters.

The report doesn't make that claim; why are you lying again? Please include the exact section you think the report makes such a claim.

It does contain this summary: Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.

 

[Truth Detector]

Barr was admonished by Mueller for giving an inaccurate summary of the report. Barr left out things like the secret meeting, the attempt at obstructing justice, and the attempt at e-mailing Russian agents.

LIE and LAME; Mueller did no such thing. I do wish you weren't such a pathological liar.

 

[Truth Detector]

You are spreading Russkie style propaganda. Barr lied to Congress and now he will not only wear his old earned title "The Cover-up General" Trump's new fixer. The Mueller report was scathing for the birther-in-thief and if you read it your would have to come to grips with the fact that the report did not exonerate Trump at all. Muller punted this to Congress to deal with on a Constitutional level not Barr the new fixer to the orange grifter.

Barr did not lie to congress you gullible brain dead dumb fuck.

 

[CharacterAssassin]

Here’s what you and democrats are up to—you think you’re sneaky but you’re not. Your illicit motives are plain to anyone paying attention.

All you need is the word ‘indictment’ to come out of Barr’s mouth since Mullet punted on it. The indictment could be worthless in a courtroom but it would be invaluable to democrats in terms of their unholy crusade to impeach Trump for something/anything.

I nailed it, didn’t I.

And yet, he didn't 'punt' on it.

Why do you insist on eating your dad's own cum?

 

[StoneByStone]

Stop being such a dishonest dunce and answer the question. Did you screech, cry and demand Holders resignation when Holder was Obama's bitch. I know why you want to dance and spin around the question. It exposes you for the partisan hypocrite and liar that you are.

No, but I'm not screeching or crying about Trump either. I think Obama shouldn't have been allowed to give Holder that kind of power, but what would crying about it have done? I would have voted against Obama if that were a realistic option. I'm probably going to vote against Trump. But I don't stand in the street screaming about how fucked up our presidents are.

Barr hasn't done one thing that is illegal or would suggest he is Trump's bitch snowflake. He has followed the law. But I understand how liberals only like the law when it works in their favor.

He purposely summarized the report in a way that made Trump look good. He left out all of the corrupt shit Trump did, which we now know.

That's bull shit. It wasn't a summary. It was his conclusions based on the evidence contained within the report. This is a moron's argument which the Party of the Jackass is promoting to non-thinking fools like you.

It was supposed to be a summary. But either way, his conclusion was biased.


I know you don't mind Trump's corruption because he has the Magic R. But Trump is setting a dangerous lowering of the bar. What happens if the next time we have a Democratic president, they're as corrupt as Trump?