What is it you believe Jack Smith did wrong?

T. A. Gardner said:
I did. I saw it as he was given a mandate to get Trump, then went on a fishing expedition to find something, anything, to get him on. He started from a position of having nothing solid as a lead or case and simply sought to find something as he went. He lied to get warrants and subpoenas, illegally obtained things like the phone records of members of Congress (all Republicans by the way) and even in doing all that didn't have enough to bring a case. He's a political hack and mediocre liar... err, lawyer.
Click to expand...
But as always, if you did, you did not understand what you witnessed as what you say above is wrong at every level.

The Classified documents case preceeded Jack Smith being brought in so he cannot go fishing for that which is already ongoing.

The cases around Jan 6th are ones we all witnessed with our own eyes during the insurrection but more importantly BOTH Kevin McCarthy (Republican HOuse leader) and Mitch McConnell (Republican Senate Leader) indicated that the Justice Department and not COngress (impeachment) were the proper way to deal with what happened on that day,.
 
QP! said:
But as always, if you did, you did not understand what you witnessed as what you say above is wrong at every level.

The Classified documents case preceeded Jack Smith being brought in so he cannot go fishing for that which is already ongoing.
Click to expand...

I didn't mention that case.
QP! said:
The cases around Jan 6th are ones we all witnessed with our own eyes during the insurrection but more importantly BOTH Kevin McCarthy (Republican HOuse leader) and Mitch McConnell (Republican Senate Leader) indicated that the Justice Department and not COngress (impeachment) were the proper way to deal with what happened on that day,.
Click to expand...
Smith went on a fishing expedition. It's that simple. The classified documents case was weak at best. Jan 6 was going nowhere. James and Bragg's cases were falling apart even with shopped judges and a preconceived verdict.

Smith wasn't there to find any of that. The Democrats needed new dirt and Smith was there to provide it.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
I didn't mention that case.

Smith went on a fishing expedition. It's that simple. The classified documents case was weak at best. Jan 6 was going nowhere. James and Bragg's cases were falling apart even with shopped judges and a preconceived verdict.

Smith wasn't there to find any of that. The Democrats needed new dirt and Smith was there to provide it.
Click to expand...

Why do you say that Jan. 6 was going nowhere?
 
Nordberg said:
That is so stupid. How would that possibly be done and for what purpose? Those hats are available at many,many shops and online. He could find people with hats and charge them with owing a dumb hat. You idiots believe everything the insane right tells you,
Click to expand...
WTF are you talking about. Have you flipped your wig?
 
T. A. Gardner said:
I didn't mention that case.

Smith went on a fishing expedition. It's that simple. The classified documents case was weak at best. Jan 6 was going nowhere. James and Bragg's cases were falling apart even with shopped judges and a preconceived verdict.

Smith wasn't there to find any of that. The Democrats needed new dirt and Smith was there to provide it.
Click to expand...
You can repeat that over and over but you are wrong when you do.

Again, the cases Jack brought, 'Classified Doc's' and 'election Interference' CANNOT IN ANY WAY be called fishing expeditions that Garland sent Jack on with no predicate or facts.

The Classified doc's case PRECEEDED Jack, so it is IMPOSSIBLE there.

The 'Election Interference" case AGAIN had the Senate Leader, Republican Mitch McConnell, and House Minority Leader, Republican Kevin McCarthy both citing legal recourse as a proper avenue.

So once again you are wrong. When the two top Republican officials in gov't are saying the actions require legal investigation are proper and then a Democrat AG follows that and appoints SMith, only an idiot (you) ignores that and says there is no predication.

You DO NOT get more predication in 99% of cases.
1. Mitch McConnell's Statement
On February 13, 2021, immediately after voting to acquit Donald Trump during his second impeachment trial, Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell delivered a scathing speech on the Senate floor. While he called Trump "practically and morally responsible" for the attack, he argued that since Trump was now a private citizen, the Constitution restricted the Senate's power to punish him, deferring explicitly to law enforcement and the courts: [1, 2, 3]

"We have a criminal justice system in this country. We have civil litigation. And former presidents are not immune from being accountable to either one. [...] [1]
Impeachment was never intended to be the final forum for corporate justice in America. It was meant to address high crimes and misdemeanors while a person is in office. [...]
President Trump is still liable for everything he did while he was in office, as an ordinary citizen, unless the statute of limitations has run. He didn't get away with anything yet. Yet. We have a criminal justice system. We have civil litigation. And former presidents are not immune from being held accountable by either one." [1]


2. Kevin McCarthy's Statement
On January 13, 2021, during the House floor debate regarding the article of impeachment, then-House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy argued that rushing an impeachment vote just days before Trump's term ended would only further divide the country. He instead advocated for a censure and a fact-finding commission, pointing out that criminal accountability should be left to law enforcement agencies: [1]



"The President bears responsibility for Wednesday's attack on Congress by mob rioters. He should have immediately denounced the mob when he saw what was unfolding. These facts require an immediate investigation by President Trump. Accept his share of responsibility, quell the brewing unrest, and ensure President-elect Biden is able to successfully begin his term. [1]
A vote to impeach would further divide this nation. A vote to impeach will further fan the flames of partisan division. That is not the way forward. That is not to say that the president is free from blame. The president bears responsibility. [...] [1]
I believe impeaching the president in such a short timeframe would be a mistake. ... Some say let law enforcement do their work. I agree. We must understand how the security broke down and what we can do to fix it."
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
T. A. Gardner said:
Because it was.
Click to expand...
And yet it was not and that is just another stupid disproved statement by you.

Simultaneously a signficant number of Jan6th actors were either pleading out or being found guilty in cases all connected to Jan6th.

Rudy Giuliani, Ken Chesebro, Sidney Powell, Jenna Ellis, are primary amongst others who had recently went down for it.

So to say it was going nowhere is just stupidity as it was going a TON OF PLACES in many different places and when it hit court rooms convictions or confessions were secured.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
So sad that you keep lying to smear the object of your insane hatred.
Click to expand...

Poor Johnny One Note. You truly need to expand your vision; your world view is myopic. It is impeding on your ethics, for to have what is readily available to be known about Trump and support such a criminal individual despite it is to truly cast your own ethics into a poor spotlight.

You must be a horribly flawed person. I will pray for your salvation. (I’m sure you think I’m in jest, but I’m not.)
 
QP! said:
And yet it was not and that is just another stupid disproved statement by you.

Simultaneously a signficant number of Jan6th actors were either pleading out or being found guilty in cases all connected to Jan6th.

Rudy Giuliani, Ken Chesebro, Sidney Powell, Jenna Ellis, are primary amongst others who had recently went down for it.

So to say it was going nowhere is just stupidity as it was going a TON OF PLACES in many different places and when it hit court rooms convictions or confessions were secured.
Click to expand...
They're all vindicated now, dumbass. False charges were brought against them.
 
Matt Dillon said:
They're all vindicated now, dumbass. False charges were brought against them.
Click to expand...
Problem is that is a lie spread on magat media that only the most stupid magats belive.

In reality none of them have been vindicated and all convictions and confessions stand and many of them are still dealing with additional charges in State courts.
 
QP! said:
Problem is that is a lie spread on magat media that only the most stupid magats belive.

In reality none of them have been vindicated and all convictions and confessions stand and many of them are still dealing with additional charges in State courts.
Click to expand...
No, they're not. Charges will be coming after the midterms. They have the evidence now.
 
Matt Dillon said:
No, they're not. Charges will be coming after the midterms. They have the evidence now.
Click to expand...
in your stupidity you switched from the past tense, saying they were already vindicated, to your wish casting fantasy of now saying 'it is coming in the future... along with the Comey and James convictions'.

but no one else lives in your stupidity.
 
QP! said:
in your stupidity you switched from the past tense, saying they were already vindicated, to your wish casting fantasy of now saying 'it is coming in the future... along with the Comey and James convictions'.

but no one else lives in your stupidity.
Click to expand...
True. Your stupidity is your own. You own it.
macho-man-randy-savage.gif
 
More unfolding Catherine Herridge investigative reporter.

Jack Smith Seized Sensitive Payroll Data of Conservative Nonprofit, Bombshell Files Reveals
headlineusa.com

Jack Smith Seized Sensitive Payroll Data of Conservative Nonprofit, Bombshell Files Reveal | Headline USA

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) New documents show that Special Counsel Jack Smith obtained sensitive payroll data from one of the most prominent conservative organizations in the country, the Conservative Partnership Institute. CPI became the subject of Smith’s aggressive crackdown of President...
headlineusa.com headlineusa.com
 
Valentino said:
More unfolding Catherine Herridge investigative reporter.

Jack Smith Seized Sensitive Payroll Data of Conservative Nonprofit, Bombshell Files Reveals
headlineusa.com

Jack Smith Seized Sensitive Payroll Data of Conservative Nonprofit, Bombshell Files Reveal | Headline USA

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) New documents show that Special Counsel Jack Smith obtained sensitive payroll data from one of the most prominent conservative organizations in the country, the Conservative Partnership Institute. CPI became the subject of Smith’s aggressive crackdown of President...
headlineusa.com headlineusa.com
Click to expand...
Oh yeah, he went after conservative PACs, too.
 
Jarod said:
I know, you are pissed he filed charges against Trump, that were dismissed on incorrect procedural grounds, but Trump's justice department filed charges against Comey, those were dismissed.

So what is it that pisses you off about it?
Click to expand...
Faith is an established social consensus opinion practiced within one species for hundreds of generations.

Understanding self evident results of being alive as genetically eternally separated while biologically part of space and time alive adapting in plain sight one of a kind proportionately here now isn't an opinion to share it couldn't be done this way naturally.

what happens when the letter of the law takes precedence over chromosomes existing in plain sight as genetically living eternally separated by personal hearts beating and active brains navigating their relative time alive now?.

Intellectual tyranny over each ancestral lineage alive tomorrow practiced historically within one species daily here last 7,000 years in this atmosphere.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top