Vindicated? Really?They're all vindicated now, dumbass. False charges were brought against them.
Vindicated? Really?They're all vindicated now, dumbass. False charges were brought against them.
Social consensus validates social opinions in current global events working in series parallel sequence now.Vindicated? Really?
Yes, really, shitbird. Some money still needs to be clawed back, but it will be.Vindicated? Really?
Yeah, JUST like Obama did.The same shit Obama did through the IRS.
ROFLI'm sure you have a source for that.
And then some.ROFL
You really aren't bright.
It's the Senate referral for prosecution to the DOJ - Sparky.
And no one can honestly deny that Mobster Smith is guilty of each charge.
Your most high holy day was a 3 hour protest against a corrupt election that devolved into some rioting.Why do you say that Jan. 6 was going nowhere?
Poor Johnny One Note. You truly need to expand your vision; your world view is myopic. It is impeding on your ethics, for to have what is readily available to be known about Trump and support such a criminal individual despite it is to truly cast your own ethics into a poor spotlight.
You must be a horribly flawed person. I will pray for your salvation. (I’m sure you think I’m in jest, but I’m not.)
I don't see any source.ROFL
You really aren't bright.
It's the Senate referral for prosecution to the DOJ - Sparky.
And no one can honestly deny that Mobster Smith is guilty of each charge.
We are all supposed to forget all about Lois Lerner. The Communists have "memory holed" that bit of corruption. The media who chants J6 24/7 will certainly never mention it, or admit it happened. DNC propaganda corps that they are.The same shit Obama did through the IRS.
No doubt your colon wall is the only thing you see.I don't see any source.
Trump stealing a truckload of classified documents was a slam dunk. Archives and the FBI asked Trump to give back what he stole. He stashed them in several places and lied to the FBI repeatedly. He even showed some to people without clearances. The case is not dead. The next president can prosecute it, and he should. Perhaps the new Congress will do it.I didn't mention that case.
Smith went on a fishing expedition. It's that simple. The classified documents case was weak at best. Jan 6 was going nowhere. James and Bragg's cases were falling apart even with shopped judges and a preconceived verdict.
Smith wasn't there to find any of that. The Democrats needed new dirt and Smith was there to provide it.
I really, really, hope the COngress does not.Trump stealing a truckload of classified documents was a slam dunk. Archives and the FBI asked Trump to give back what he stole. He stashed them in several places and lied to the FBI repeatedly. He even showed some to people without clearances. The case is not dead. The next president can prosecute it, and he should. Perhaps the new Congress will do it.
Yeah, no. The NARA dude told "Biden" to demand Trump's stuff or none of this would ever have happened.Trump stealing a truckload of classified documents was a slam dunk. Archives and the FBI asked Trump to give back what he stole. He stashed them in several places and lied to the FBI repeatedly. He even showed some to people without clearances. The case is not dead. The next president can prosecute it, and he should. Perhaps the new Congress will do it.
Trump stealing a truckload of classified documents was a slam dunk. '
Archives and the FBI asked Trump to give back what he stole.
He stashed them in several places and lied to the FBI repeatedly.
He even showed some to people without clearances. The case is not dead. The next president can prosecute it, and he should. Perhaps the new Congress will do it.
Biden stole classified documents. His son Bagman used them as leverage in quid pro quo bribery deals.Trump stealing a truckload of classified documents was a slam dunk. Archives and the FBI asked Trump to give back what he stole. He stashed them in several places and lied to the FBI repeatedly. He even showed some to people without clearances. The case is not dead. The next president can prosecute it, and he should. Perhaps the new Congress will do it.
Who'd you plagiarize that from, fuckstick?I really, really, hope the COngress does not.
We have seen all that does is lead to political theater and grandstanding that just hardens both sides to defend their team.
The next Dem POTUS, imo, needs to state the follwoing:
'The Rule of Law and our understanding of it has been seriously challenged under this Trump admin. Things that were prior considered illegal or against norms the Trump admin did with the support of their DoJ. To reestablish a rule of law that is clear and will be applied equally to all i am putting in place a AG whose first job is to appoint dozens of Special Counsels to investigate each and every area where the Trump admin challenged prior laws and norms and bring cases to the courts and eventually the SC so that we can have clear and DECIDED law in each of these areas on what is correct. We cannot have different Administrations take office and operate on entirely different understandings of what is legal or not and can and cannot be done. We need one singular rule of law for all.'
Then let the dozens of Special Counsels to bring those cases to the court, not necessarily to punish Trump and his admin (that will likely happen but is not the point) but as a way to have one set of rules going forward so future Trumps (left or right) cannot legally follow his game plan.
