What is your opinion of this tactic?

Jarod

Well-known member
Contributor
No, I am dead serious.

You are at your worse when you let anger take over for logic.
I'm not angry you are. I'm saddened by the death of someone who was infected with leftism and now her kids will have to grow up without a mother and instead of denouncing her decision you applaud it. I don't give a fuck about you leftists
 
I'm not angry you are. I'm saddened by the death of someone who was infected with leftism and now her kids will have to grow up without a mother and instead of denouncing her decision you applaud it. I don't give a fuck about you leftists
I am sad for both Babbitt and Good. I have applauded nothing.
 
Last edited:
Who the fuck is ashi? You don't even know what the fuck is going on do you? You have justified the cold blooded murder of babbitt.
JFC. I think Babbit is even a bigger Darwin award loser who "urned it"

Despite multiple warnings not to proceed, she attempted to climb through a shattered window beside a barricaded door.
 
JFC. I think Babbit is even a bigger Darwin award loser who "urned it"

Despite multiple warnings not to proceed, she attempted to climb through a shattered window beside a barricaded door.
And the stupid dyke dyke was interfering with law enforcement officers. You have to be a retard or a leftist to think that's a good idea.
 
Quoted from the OP article in the radical Leftist publication The Nation.

  • Border Patrol agents have intentionally and unnecessarily stepped in front of moving cars to justify using deadly force against vehicle occupants.

How did they figure out that it was intentional or unnecessary? Psychic powers maybe?
  • Agents have shot in frustration across the US-Mexico border at rock throwers when simply moving away was an option.
Why should our Border Patrol have to leave the area or take a step back because criminals in Mexico are throwing rocks at them? Wouldn't moving away be just what the rock throwers want and encourage them to do it more often?

  • Border Patrol demonstrates a “lack of diligence” in investigating incidents in which US agents fire their weapons.
This is completely subjective. What constitutes due diligence here? What are the measurable standards?
  • It’s questionable whether Border Patrol “consistently and thoroughly reviews” incidents in which agents use deadly force.

Same as above. What's consistent and thorough look like compared to what the Border Patrol is doing?

Seems to me that the LA Times and the author of this article in The Nation are simply fishing for anything to use against the Border Patrol and law enforcement in general.

Some of "blogger" Steve Hsieh's other articles in The Nation

What It Was Like Living Under Police Occupation in Ferguson​


Police Arrest Two Protesters Demanding a Special Investigator in the Michael Brown Shooting​


Human Rights Groups Blast Obama’s Plan to Open New Immigrant Family Detention Centers​


Hsieh is just your run of the mill, government hating, radical Leftist who has an extremist set of views and regularly publishes articles with that slant. Hsieh is widely published among far Left and radical Left publications currently.
 
Last edited:
Border Patrol agents have intentionally and unnecessarily stepped in front of moving cars to justify using deadly force against vehicle occupants.

Is doing such a thing acceptable?

Why are the cars moving?
Were they told to stop?
Why are you posting shit again?
 
Why are the cars moving?
Were they told to stop?
Why are you posting shit again?
Does it matter if they were moving?
Why would it matter if they were told to stop?


I am asking for your thoughts around this issue.

Does continuing when an officer tells you to stop justify deadly force?
 
Does it matter if they were moving?
Why would it matter if they were told to stop?


I am asking for your thoughts around this issue.

Does continuing when an officer tells you to stop justify deadly force?
It all matters. It also matters that on the Southern US border, with drug runners, car thieves, human smuggling, and lots of other very serious criminal activity, guns and weapons abound among those doing these things. Border Patrol agents are often far from support--they could be an hour or more out in the desert for example--leaving them on their own facing potentially armed and dangerous criminals.

Should they be lackadaisical in their approach of suspects?

As for continuing when an officer tells you to stop does justify deadly force if the rest of the situation is sufficiently hostile or a threat that requires it.



Full on firefights occur with some regularity on our Southern border because of the criminal activity. Drug smugglers are heavily armed, sometimes with automatic weapons. Should Border Patrol agents be taking chances?
 
Does it matter if they were moving?
Why would it matter if they were told to stop?


I am asking for your thoughts around this issue.

Does continuing when an officer tells you to stop justify deadly force?
Why would it matter if they were told to stop? How fucking stupid are you? If person won't follow a lawful command, especially in a highly charged situation, then you have no idea what the fuck the blessing is going to do. You filthy fucks have no clue what it's like being a LEO in a situation like that. You think you you know everything but you don't know shit.
 
Back
Top