Too hard to readAs if something so obvious needs one. But, then again, you are retarded. So...
![]()
No, it isn't. The Army is raised separately as a federal component. The militia (National Guard) is raised by the individual states and can be federalized in time of war. Congress can appropriate funds and set standards for the states to use in training and equipping the militia.The army was part of that militia they clearly mentioned in the constitution
Come on lazy assholeNo, it isn't. The Army is raised separately as a federal component. The militia (National Guard) is raised by the individual states and can be federalized in time of war. Congress can appropriate funds and set standards for the states to use in training and equipping the militia.
You are also still retarded.
Readable linkNo, it isn't. The Army is raised separately as a federal component. The militia (National Guard) is raised by the individual states and can be federalized in time of war. Congress can appropriate funds and set standards for the states to use in training and equipping the militia.
You are also still retarded.
To raise and support armies, but no appropriation of money to that use shall be for a longer term than two years; To provide and maintain a navy; Clause 12Come on lazy asshole
Provide the text of what you claimed
Such part of them as my be employed by the service of the United States[The Congress shall have Power . . . ] To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress; . . .
That was the Continental Army, NOT the United States Army. It is generally accepted the latter is a continuation of the former.1. The U.S. Army: Established on June 14, 1775
When called up to do so. Read the fucking clause you retard!Such part of them as my be employed by the service of the United States
Thats feds dude
Your point is not as clear as you think it isTo raise and support armies, but no appropriation of money to that use shall be for a longer term than two years; To provide and maintain a navy; Clause 12
Note that this IN ARTICLE 1 SECTION 8 is separate from the establishment of militias.
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the militia, and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United States, reserving to the states respectively, the appointment of the officers, and the authority of training the militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress; Clause 16
Separately the militia are described in Article 1 Section 8. Note that the states control the militia and that Congress can call them up when necessary.
To provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions; Clause 15
Article 1, Section 8, US Constitution
americanusconstitution.com
So, you are still retarded. The proof is you don't know what the hell you're talking about.
Then why did it say United States idiotThat was the Continental Army, NOT the United States Army. It is generally accepted the latter is a continuation of the former.
My point is perfectly clear, and 100% correct. It is YOU who can't comprehend how the US military is set up.Your point is not as clear as you think it is
The United StatesSuch part of them as my be employed by the service of the United States
Thats feds dude
You can’t force people to be as dishonest as youMy point is perfectly clear, and 100% correct. It is YOU who can't comprehend how the US military is set up.
The United States of America didn't exist until July 4 1776. You are still retarded.Then why did it say United States idiot
We are fully aware we just don't care.No, not really. Our Russian handlers dont like us reading the Anerican Constitution.![]()