When lefties tell you that healthcare should be free, show them this
- Thread starter Diogenes
- Start date
They asked Brits on the street if they would want to move to America. Lots of reasons were given against it. All mentioned the healthcare system, I have Canadian relatives. I ask them every time I see them if they are ready for American healthcare. They laugh and tell me I am nuts,
So you say, Nerdsperg.
Yakuda
Verified User
You are nuts but thats not relevant. So let me get this straight because those two idiots wont move here you think that matters for some reason? LMFAO
Well nordie, they got that right.
Of course, leftists frame the inability to communicate in English (in England) as "raysizzum".
View: https://x.com/Con_Tomlinson/status/2084618115120275531?s=20
View: https://x.com/Con_Tomlinson/status/2084618115120275531?s=20
What a vapid reply. You are not trying.
When the facts aren't in dispute, I don't need to try, Nerdsperg. Your anecdotes are not backed with a single scrap of evidence, and you know it.
That doesn't prove it didn't happen, Nerdsperg.
It did happen.
The Christian Post headline accurately summarizes a real case documented in an official Ontario report. “Nerdsperg” is wrong.
The case involves an elderly woman in her 80s (anonymized as “Mrs. B”) in Ontario. She had serious complications after coronary artery bypass surgery, entered palliative care, and was discharged home under her husband’s care. She initially expressed interest in Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD). When the first assessor evaluated her, she withdrew the request, citing personal and religious values/beliefs, and said she preferred palliative/hospice care and palliative sedation.
Hospice placement was denied. Her husband, described as experiencing caregiver burnout, took her to the ER (she was discharged as stable) and then contacted the provincial MAiD coordinator for an urgent second assessment. A second practitioner found her eligible the same day, overriding the first assessor’s concerns about urgency, the sudden shift in her stated goals, and possible coercion or undue influence tied to the husband’s burnout. The first assessor asked to re-evaluate her the next day; that was refused on “clinical circumstances” grounds. A third (virtual) assessor signed off, and she received MAiD that evening.
This comes from the Ontario MAiD Death Review Committee (MDRC) report under the Office of the Chief Coroner, specifically in the context of reviewing complex same-day/next-day provisions (report often referenced as covering “Navigating Complex Issues within Same Day and Next Day MAiD Provisions”). Committee members raised multiple red flags: the rushed timeline prevented full exploration of her social and end-of-life circumstances; assessments occurred with the spouse present; the husband appeared primary in advocating and navigating access with limited documentation that the process was self-directed; denial of preferred hospice care; and possible external pressure from caregiver burnout. Dr. Ramona Coelho (a committee member) publicly emphasized that the focus should have been on urgently re-engaging palliative care instead.
The story was covered by multiple outlets (Christian Post, Post Millennial, Western Standard, LifeSite, Mirror, Epoch Times, etc.) in late January–early February 2026 after the report details circulated. The “against her will” framing reflects the committee’s documented concerns about the withdrawal of consent, the override process, and potential coercion—not a literal claim that she was physically forced while actively resisting at the moment of the procedure. Under Canadian MAiD rules at the time, same-day provision was possible for Track 1 (reasonably foreseeable death) cases once two independent assessments cleared it, with no mandatory reflection period.
Primary documentation is the official MDRC case review itself. Secondary reporting is consistent across sources that examined the report. Claims that “this didn’t happen” contradict the coroner’s office records and the multi-disciplinary committee’s own analysis of the case.
Jade Dragon
And I'm the one that jaded you.
Legion doesn't believe most of what he posts. He'll even switch sides on a whim and cackle like a demented fool when you take notice. He obviously gets off on trolling and spamming. With the midterms approaching, he might decide to use leftism to troll this time. He was batting as TheHarrisAdministration around the last election.
Cry harder, faggot. Did your mom bring your tendies yet?
Sure, when Canada picked their all-time favourite politician, it came out Tommy Douglas, the father of Canadian healthcare.That is because they do not like it. https://pnhp.org/news/tommy-douglas-a-remarkable-canadian/ Not covered in your reading was it?
Nobody said they "don't like it", Nerdsperg.
God damn, you're stupid. I'm sure that's why you're a lefty.
Ow.. Stop it! The irony hurts too much.