Whistleblower contacted Schiff before filing complaint: report

Isn’t ‘a vague version’ kind of rough draft lol?

Why would Schiff need to see an early version of the report? Did he have any input into it?

Who are the real criminals here?

You didn't read the intial post's source either, he didn't take it to Schiff, but rather a staff person on the Committee, who after telling the whistle blower to obtain an attorney, then reported the whistle blower's questions back to Schiff. No law was broken, no advantage was gained, in fact, according to the source it is a common practice with Gov't whistle blowers

And the FACT remains, nearly everything the whistle blower had in his complaint was confirmed in Trump's phone call, all this is a deflection and nothing more
 
Did you even read your own source?
They did not contact Schiff, but a staff person on the Committee, who advised them to hire an attorney, plus, it is a common practice for those thinking of filing a complaint

You dishonest dunce; this has Adam Schiff's hand prints all over it. :rolleyes:

Amazing how Trumpkins are so desperate,

It's amazing how GULLIBLE and desperate you morons on the left are.

they fabricate all kinds inneundos from unrelaring facts, now Trump even has Schiff authoring the whistle blower's complaint, which I am sure some of the lemmings here believe

THIS; from a dishonest asshole that does nothing BUT fabricate and parrot the innuendos and lies from the PHONY media and hacks like Adam Schiff. STFU, seriously. :rolleyes:

I though assembling a "deep state" entity from a dozen phrases in over five thousand plus Emails was reaching, but this now might equal it, imagine it will be the story on the demogogues propaganda this evening and regurgitated as fact in the days to follow

You don't think dumbass. You parrot the painfully stupid narratives you are fed from the PHONY media and Party of the Jackass.

And the funniest part is that it was revealed by the New York Times, which under any other circumstance Trumpkins would tell us is all fake news

Kind of like morons on the left who use Fox when it suits them? STFU you brain dead hypocrite. :rolleyes:
 
Like ........
giphy.gif

STFU hack. :rolleyes:
 
There's nothing wrong with that.

In fact, he only contacted Schiff because the CIA lawyer and DOJ lawyers went to Trump, who was the subject of that complaint.

LIE and LAME. Take your empty head out of your asshole dumbass. :rolleyes:
 
You dishonest dunce; this has Adam Schiff's hand prints all over it. :rolleyes:



It's amazing how GULLIBLE and desperate you morons on the left are.



THIS; from a dishonest asshole that does nothing BUT fabricate and parrot the innuendos and lies from the PHONY media and hacks like Adam Schiff. STFU, seriously. :rolleyes:

You don't think dumbass. You parrot the painfully stupid narratives you are fed from the PHONY media and Party of the Jackass.

Kind of like morons on the left who use Fox when it suits them? STFU you brain dead hypocrite. :rolleyes:

Now we have breaking details, Schiff's prints were all over the complaint, the plot thickens

Didn't I mention previously, "truthie" ain't worth the effort
 
Actually, an impeachment is completely legal. So it's not a coup.

An impeachment based on hearsay and innuendo is anything BUT legal. It is a FARCE. But then, you are an uneducated partisan hack who does nothing on this forum but lie your dumb ass off. :rolleyes:
 
Now we have breaking details, Schiff's prints were all over the complaint, the plot thickens
Didn't I mention previously, "truthie" ain't worth the effort

No Arsecheese; you're the asshole that isn't worth the effort. I doubt you could post without lying your dumb ass off.

You have NEVER been right, EVER. Yet you come on this forum lying your dumb ass off as if you weren't one of the biggest morons on the forum. It is quite stunning to watch. ;)
 
You didn't read the intial post's source either, he didn't take it to Schiff, but rather a staff person on the Committee, who after telling the whistle blower to obtain an attorney, then reported the whistle blower's questions back to Schiff. No law was broken, no advantage was gained, in fact, according to the source it is a common practice with Gov't whistle blowers

And the FACT remains, nearly everything the whistle blower had in his complaint was confirmed in Trump's phone call, all this is a deflection and nothing more

The WB had ‘questions’ lol?

Inquiring minds would like to know what sorts of questions were asked of Schiff. Did any of Schiff’s answers find their way into the report?

I know of only one way to find out.
 
An impeachment based on hearsay and innuendo is anything BUT legal. It is a FARCE. But then, you are an uneducated partisan hack who does nothing on this forum but lie your dumb ass off. :rolleyes:

Aww, you were doing ok, but then you got mad and sperged out.

But no, even if the impeachment was based on hearsay, it would still be legal.
 
The WB had ‘questions’ lol?

Inquiring minds would like to know what sorts of questions were asked of Schiff. Did any of Schiff’s answers find their way into the report?

I know of only one way to find out.


No one said anywhere that Schiff read the complaint ahead of time let alone write it

This, and all innuendos you are repeating are negated by the simple FACT that nearly everything the whistle blower had in his complaint was confirmed in Trump's phone call, Trump himself legitimatized the complaint, all this Schiff conspiracy is irrelevant
 
Back
Top