White people set to become minority in US by 2050 - 13 years before Britain

Folks, go to the article and look at the Table labled US LIVE BIRTHS BY MATERNAL RACE AND HISPANIC ETHNICITY 2016 VS 2024.
"Folks"?

What are you, a cheesy game show host or TV commercial bullshitter?

Besides, I doubt anybody is going to waste their time on something only you, in your obsessive hatred of wypipo, gives a shit about.
Reading all the information comprehensively is apropos to the OP an subsequent posts by Guno and myself.
"Hate whitey!!! Hate whitey!!! Hate whitey!!!"
The intent was a counter to all the noise by our resident racists and bigots... so triggered by something they, as I, will not live to see.
Everyone who doesn't agree with everything you say are "racists and bigots".

And you are the one who is "triggered" by it.
This means that if trends continue, social and political dynamics will change, and maga won't be the presence that it is now.
So IOW... you're saying "things are going to change in the future".

Wow. Such "big news".... :palm:

News so big you can't quit yapping and squawking about it.

Who else besides you would have ever thought that things will change?

Something that's obvious to everyone.

Except that whole "white majority" thing.

That's something that will be around for a looooong time. :rofl2:
Triggering neo-nazis and white supremacist/nationalist does NOT accuse all white Americans as such. That Nomad perceives it that way speaks volumes on his mindset. Let’s watch him foolishly chuckle and dance.
The "RENT FREE" sign is so prominently displayed inside your otherwise empty head, I just said fuck it and took up residence.
The grinning fool you see in the mirror agrees with you. 😉
Sorry, but I have never seen you in the mirror.
 
Personally I don't care either way. Even if I were to live to see 2050, I wouldn't care.
I honestly don't know how I'd react to it. How can anybody know prior to experiencing it?
That's why I'm happy knowing I won't be here.

Solidarity seems to come so much easier to homogeneous societies. In my experience, we've never known it here. It's just not politically correct to admit it. We're supposed to revel in the diversity that always divides us. I wish it worked. I haven't seen it work.
 
Look at the current situation. Rampant efforts in gerry-mandering to lessen current minority voting power. That changes in population shift resulting in who gets voted into local, state an federal offices. Policies will change, etc., etc.

The article when put in the big picture of the other states in this country is more of a minor story and not indicative of all others.
If we're talking from a political perspective, I'm reminded of the Latino city council woman from L.A., Nury Martinez, who was caught on leaked audio making anti-black remarks and saying Latinos needed to redraw city district maps to preserve Latino power. She had to step down after that.

Non-whites don't all share similar political interests and world views. And as the non-white population increases they'll be more competition among non-white groups as they gain more power.
 
Last edited:
White people were at 7 ercent when they controlled South Africa. If you own or control the institutions, news, military and police, you can still keep the power. You can keep that power for a long time if you share a little bit of the money and power.
 
HJu9HCOaoAAvgRR
 
White people were at 7 ercent when they controlled South Africa. If you own or control the institutions, news, military and police, you can still keep the power. You can keep that power for a long time if you share a little bit of the money and power.
While I get the point for South Africa, white people in the U.S. aren't united in that way.

The chances of a white liberal in San Francisco and a white conservative from rural Alabama saying we need to put our differences aside for the unity of white people likely isn't high.
 
For people of mixed European and African descent, historically they were black by law. Because of that, both black and white people treated them as black. And that was the case from not long after the British got involved in the slave trade right up to the 1960s (within living memory). That means that for centuries, people in America and then the US associated looking like mixed black and white as being black. .
 
Tiger Woods isn't black...Kam isn't black... Actually when you think about it black people are becoming the minority...
For people of mixed European and African descent, historically they were black by law. Because of that, both black and white people treated them as black. And that was the case from not long after the British got involved in the slave trade right up to the 1960s (within living memory). That means that for centuries, people in America and then the US associated looking like mixed black and white as being black.
 
For people of mixed European and African descent, historically they were black by law. Because of that, both black and white people treated them as black. And that was the case from not long after the British got involved in the slave trade right up to the 1960s (within living memory). That means that for centuries, people in America and then the US associated looking like mixed black and white as being black. .
Pigmentation is not the factor instigating all racial intolerances. For many people, it's the cultural difference that's the bigger factor. Neighboring state Massachusetts is the perfect example.

They voted for the first black US senator since Reconstruction. They overwhelmingly voted for Obama both times. Big Papi David Ortiz is pretty much regarded as a god. Former TV news anchor turned clergywoman Liz Walker is beloved throughout the commonwealth as well.

But many whites from Massachusetts have almost no tolerance for stereotypical black "jive"--the dress, the language, the street demeanor, any of it. As a result, Massachusetts has the reputation of being the most racist navy blue state in the republic. To many blacks, the reputation is well deserved. The tolerance and even admiration for "culturally correct" people of color is no mitigating factor to them.

So if one agrees with the above analysis, which is easily observable, is Massachusetts really racist? Remember, these people have no tolerance for white hayseed behavior either, but that won't change the opinion of most critics. Comments? I don't usually encourage responses to my posts, but this time, I'm truly curious.
 
For people of mixed European and African descent, historically they were black by law. Because of that, both black and white people treated them as black. And that was the case from not long after the British got involved in the slave trade right up to the 1960s (within living memory). That means that for centuries, people in America and then the US associated looking like mixed black and white as being black. .
Curious if you have any thoughts on the Lowell High School article I posted about the school separating bi-racial (black) students from black students?

From a straight data collection perspective I can understand separating kids of two or more races into their own category. But from a cultural perspective, a black/white bi-racial kid is black. And the school seemed to separate them there as well.
 
Last edited:
That george floyd death is still up for interpretation. Floyd had all kinds of deadly drugs running throughout his body at the time of his death. At that time someone farting in his face might have gagged him to death as well. There were black cops there as well, and they certainly didn't find fault
with the way Floyd was being pinned down. Floyd's unfortunate death led to the racist BLM organization to go onto murder some 2 dozen people all across America (mostly in blue sanctuary cities) during the summer of so-called fun.
I saw the video of the execution!
 
I didn't see anything from post #31 that says and confirms that obama is half white and half black.
Post #31 demonstrates your intellectual dishonesty. When proven wrong, you just disappear from that exchange to avoid admitting fault.

As to the nonsense regarding Obama's racial identification, he identifies as black on the Census.

His parents racial ID were on his birth certificate

If you have any other stupid birther BS to regurgitate, please come up with something new other than stubborn blather.
 
While I get the point for South Africa, white people in the U.S. aren't united in that way.

The chances of a white liberal in San Francisco and a white conservative from rural Alabama saying we need to put our differences aside for the unity of white people likely isn't high.
But not improbable when it comes to politics, as we see with AIPAC influence i both political parties and throughout our media.
 
Back
Top