Who owes reparations?
- Thread starter Diogenes
- Start date
The USA came into being in 1784. The "Democratic-Republicans" were one of the original parties - with Jefferson dropping "Democratic" from the name in 1801.
The democrat party arose with Aaron Burr in New York and his cohorts. It was animosity between Jefferson and Burr that caused Tom to drop "democratic" and Burr to found a new party. Burr maintained through his life and later treason that Jefferson STOLE the presidency from him.
Burr was a scumbag and a traitor - setting the precedent for every democrat who has followed him.
When Andrew Jackson finally won the presidency as a democrat - he cemented racism as a founding principle by initiating the "Trail of Tears."
democrats, democrat NEVER change.
By 30,000 years.
Africans should pay me reparations for holding my ancestors as slaves.
Bullshit.
Slavery in America is a democrat institution. They championed and fought the first civil war to protect slavery. They are engaged in insurrection that teeters on open civil war now - to protect illegal alien slavery.
The democrats define slavery in America, and slavery defines the democrats.
Jerry Mathers
Was it me?
bullshit.
slaves were all over this country for hundreds of years.
it bipartisan evil.
go eat your own ass liar.
Muslims spread Chattel Slavery every place they corrupted, including Europe.
Europe had slavery before the Muslims, but it was the indentured type. Fixed period and not generational. Muslims brought "born a slave, die a slave" to Europe as they conquered Spain and France.
Jerry Mathers
Was it me?
neocon republicans support slavery right now by outsourcing to child and prisoner labor in totalitarian regimes.
so go extremely fuck yourself.
There was no country prior to 1884. Slavery lasted a scant 80 years in this country.
During that short time, 75% of slaves were owned by the top 100 plantations in 6 Southern states,.
Slavery was very much a democrat and a southern issue.
Nope. The Republican party arose and adopted the mantel of Jefferson specifically to fight slavery. Lincoln was an abolitionist from the start, as the Lincoln-Douglas debates so fully show.
I see you've gone full blown Marxist since losing your job.
Jerry Mathers
Was it me?
aribitrary demarcation.
shut your idiot hole.
globalists support uighur slavery right now.
and globalist mind-infection is bipartisan.
You mean the few neocons still left join the democrats to support slavery right now by outsourcing to child and prisoner labor in totalitarian regimes.
Poor Jerry, a new convert to evil and excited to lie the past away.
Have you converted to Islam yet? It's the next step in your journey to absolute evil.
Jerry Mathers
Was it me?
all the neocons support overseas slavery.
neocons are on both sides of the aisle..
that's why the bushes and their buttchildren switched to the dem party when trump was making non-neocon noises, though he lied, as we have found out since then.
So you are a globalist.
No surprise - it is the home of evil.
But no, the rise of the United States was not "aribitrary demarcation" (sic) Comrade. It was the rise of the greatest and most moral nation this planet has ever known.
I'm well aware you do.
You also support the enslavement of 50 million people in Africa.
Okay Evince...
Grok, does Jerry suck the cock of goats?
Democrats are generally more supportive of policies associated with “globalism” than Republicans in contemporary U.S. politics.
“Globalism” typically refers to support for free trade, multilateral institutions (UN, WTO, NATO, WHO, etc.), international agreements, economic integration, and relatively open approaches to immigration and global cooperation—versus nationalism, protectionism, and prioritizing national sovereignty (“America First”).
Evidence from polling and policy
Recent surveys (Chicago Council on Global Affairs, Pew Research Center, Gallup, and others) show consistent partisan gaps:
- International organizations and multilateralism: Democrats are far more likely to support strengthening the UN, working through international bodies even when it requires compromise, and viewing participation in such organizations as effective. Republicans show much lower support and greater skepticism.
- Trade: Democrats more often view international trade and free-trade agreements as beneficial to the U.S. economy, jobs, and consumers. Republicans have grown more skeptical, with higher support for tariffs, restrictions to protect jobs, and in some polls a preference for greater self-sufficiency over expanded global free trade. (Note: This is a reversal from earlier decades when many Republicans were strong free-traders.)
- Alliances and foreign engagement: Democrats show higher support for NATO, alliances as a source of strength, foreign aid, and an active U.S. role in world affairs that takes other countries’ interests into account. Republicans more often prioritize U.S. interests unilaterally and express greater skepticism of ongoing commitments (e.g., aid to Ukraine).
- Immigration: Democrats generally favor higher levels of legal immigration and pathways for unauthorized immigrants already present. Republicans prioritize restriction, enforcement, and lower overall levels.
Jerry Mathers
Was it me?
Jerry Mathers
Was it me?
neocons love slavery and promote using it all over the world.
don't blame me for your evil, douche-granola.
This is you revealing that you are so out of touch with reality that you are likely a danger to yourself.
I have never assaulted a federal officer.
It seems you don't understand who is actually being charged with sex crimes in the US and around the world. Trump has pardoned several such criminals.