Why is Trump such a socialist?

Why is Trump using the Federal Government to tell private companies if they can or cannot fly airplanes they own?

These are private corporations who own these airplanes... Should they not be free to make the choice?

That isn't being socialist... Idiot
 
It is an economic and somewhat social system where the workers maintain a level of self management and in some way own the means of production.

Many of those workers can't manage themselves. How are they going to manage things on a much larger level?
 
I beleive some level of socialism is necessary to have a healthy functioning society as a counterbalance to a necessary level of capitalism.

You mean a society whereby those unwilling to do for themselves can blame a capitalist system where they've failed because they're incompetent.
 
Any examples of that in America?

Sure, many. The Government telling the airlines they must ground the airplanes is a bit socialist, in that it takes some ownership rights away from the corporations and allows the government control instead. There are thousands of other examples. Energy/power companies in the Untied States are generally very socialist. The auto manufacturer companies that are heavily managed by unions are another example. I could go on for a long time.

The way Lawyers are generally self managed with the ability to kick eachother out of the profession has a lot of socialist elements to it.
 
I know what socialism is, and I know what Retrumplicans have been saying it is, and they are two different things.

Well all republicans don’t speak for me. You should ask them. I reject your premise. But I do however applaud you for supporting President Trump

There may be hope for you yet
 
It is an economic and somewhat social system where the workers maintain a level of self management and in some way own the means of production.

Yes the workers. Always about the workers right? That is how socialists sell it but there are inherent flaws that adherents never account for and it ALWAYS leads to totalitarianism. It did so in Nazi germany, Soviet Union, North Korea, China and Venezuela.
 
I beleive some level of socialism is necessary to have a healthy functioning society as a counterbalance to a necessary level of capitalism.

So doesn't everybody here. The difference is the degree.

Therefore your OP was complete bullshit.
 
Yes the workers. Always about the workers right? That is how socialists sell it but there are inherent flaws that adherents never account for and it ALWAYS leads to totalitarianism. It did so in Nazi germany, Soviet Union, North Korea, China and Venezuela.

Do you have a serious misunderstanding of history.
 
Heheheh, good way to look at it. I suspect the only reason he stepped in and grounded the planes is because of all the rumors going around about his business and buddy connections with Boeing. It was starting to look as though the govt. (FAA) was protecting them instead of the public.

Or he chose not to jump to a conclusion. Do you realize the impact that a company like Boeing has on the US economy?
 
Do you have a serious misunderstanding of history.

Oh, I understand history very well. Socialism like liberalism is always sold as a way to help the poor and the children and the old because who can be against helping the poor, the children and the old? Remember all of the pictures of Hitler (since you are reading scholarly texts about Hitler) with the youth?

The problem with socialism/marxism and communism is that it runs counter to human nature. Oh, you will always have takers who are willing to demand that others provide for them. We see it here on a daily basis from JPP leftists. JPP is littered with leftists. But, for most, human nature is that we want to take care of ourselves first. We want to provide for our family. We don't want to have our property confiscated by the government to have it transferred to a taker so we resist. Well, noble "socialists" such as yourself can't abide by that. You see, you are convinced of your own self importance and aggrandizement. You ask yourself "How could anyone be against me taking their property so I can help the poor, the sick, the children and the old?". You convince yourselves that those who resist you are "evil" and "greedy" and whatever other derision you can throw their way. But, you won't accept human nature, so you eventually turn to force. You will not abandon what you believe to be "noble" goals so you convince yourself that the ends justify they means.

That is why everywhere true socialism is tried, it leads to violence, destruction and poverty. Oh, trust me I know history all too well. It is you who does not. All of the things you accuse Trump of being, the democrat party does and more. You just can't see it. You are convinced of your own moral superiority because you come to a message board and pompously proclaim that you "want to help the poor and the rich should pay for it". You think that somehow makes you a good person. It doesn't
 
So doesn't everybody here. The difference is the degree.

Therefore your OP was complete bullshit.

I do not think most ReTrumplicans see that its about the degree, they seem to play a 0 sum game, making the ignorant claim that any level of socialism is unacceptable.
 
Why is Trump using the Federal Government to tell private companies if they can or cannot fly airplanes they own?

These are private corporations who own these airplanes... Should they not be free to make the choice?

Another incredibly stupid analogy; you're quite full of them aren't you? Perhaps if you understood what Socialism means you wouldn't make such moronic analogies? Dunce.
 
Oh, I understand history very well. Socialism like liberalism is always sold as a way to help the poor and the children and the old because who can be against helping the poor, the children and the old? Remember all of the pictures of Hitler (since you are reading scholarly texts about Hitler) with the youth?

The problem with socialism/marxism and communism is that it runs counter to human nature. Oh, you will always have takers who are willing to demand that others provide for them. We see it here on a daily basis from JPP leftists. JPP is littered with leftists. But, for most, human nature is that we want to take care of ourselves first. We want to provide for our family. We don't want to have our property confiscated by the government to have it transferred to a taker so we resist. Well, noble "socialists" such as yourself can't abide by that. You see, you are convinced of your own self importance and aggrandizement. You ask yourself "How could anyone be against me taking their property so I can help the poor, the sick, the children and the old?". You convince yourselves that those who resist you are "evil" and "greedy" and whatever other derision you can throw their way. But, you won't accept human nature, so you eventually turn to force. You will not abandon what you believe to be "noble" goals so you convince yourself that the ends justify they means.

That is why everywhere true socialism is tried, it leads to violence, destruction and poverty. Oh, trust me I know history all too well. It is you who does not. All of the things you accuse Trump of being, the democrat party does and more. You just can't see it. You are convinced of your own moral superiority because you come to a message board and pompously proclaim that you "want to help the poor and the rich should pay for it". You think that somehow makes you a good person. It doesn't

You and I have a very different view of human nature and of history. Hitler was an authoritarian, and an absolutist. Socialism, without authoritarianism and mixed with Capitalism tends to work well.
 
No, I am pointing out his hypocrisy.

How is it hypocritical you brain dead dunce? :laugh:

How about this hypocrisy; Liberals defending Obamunsim for eight years while he ran up trillion dollar deficits and now whine about Trump running deficits?

How about this hypocrisy; Liberals cheering Obama when he said he would bypass Congress and had a pen and now whine about Trump declaring an emergency at the border to build a wall?

How about this hypocrisy; Liberals defending Obamunsim for eight years while he lied to them about Obamacare and now whine about Trump not saving Obamacare?

How about this hypocrisy; Liberals whining about Republicans in Congress obstructing Obamunsim and now claim it is A-OK when dealing with Trump?

Morons on the left like you DEFINE hypocrisy....along with being pathological lying assholes and Fascistic dumb fucks.
 
It is an economic and somewhat social system where the workers maintain a level of self management and in some way own the means of production.

WRONG, LIE and LAME.

Definition of socialism

1 : any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
2a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property
b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state
3 : a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done
 
Back
Top