Why is Trump such a socialist?

I beleive some level of socialism is necessary to have a healthy functioning society as a counterbalance to a necessary level of capitalism.

Strawman; who is advocating to not have any form of government or have government manage aspects of human safety? No one. Dunce.
 
Many Retrumplicans would have called it socialist if Obama had done it.

LIE and LAME. But here you are pretending to know what you are whining about while looking like a moron. Hell, you can't even define Socialism correctly. No wonder you're an idiot.
 
Sure, many. The Government telling the airlines they must ground the airplanes is a bit socialist, in that it takes some ownership rights away from the corporations and allows the government control instead. There are thousands of other examples. Energy/power companies in the Untied States are generally very socialist. The auto manufacturer companies that are heavily managed by unions are another example. The way Lawyers are generally self managed with the ability to kick eachother out of the profession has a lot of socialist elements to it. I could go on for a long time.

It is OBVIOUS that you don't know the definition of Socialism. No wonder you make such moronic analogies and then get your ass kicked with the facts.

I could go on for a long time.

Yes you could; and not look any smarter for it. :laugh:
 
I do not think most ReTrumplicans see that its about the degree, they seem to play a 0 sum game, making the ignorant claim that any level of socialism is unacceptable.

Ironic in that you just described your own arguments, views and simplistic, and stupid, analogies.

Hell, you can't get the definition of Socialism correct, how can we expect you to argue without lying, deflecting and crying.
 
You and I have a very different view of human nature and of history. Hitler was an authoritarian, and an absolutist. Socialism, without authoritarianism and mixed with Capitalism tends to work well.

There are ZERO examples of where Socialism has worked well in our history. There are ZERO examples of where Marxism has worked well in our history. There are examples of authoritarian dictators who allow capitalism that have worked very well and then, after Socialists took over, destroyed the country.

I do wish you knew your history and what you are emoting about; but alas, you do not which is why you defend an ideology that is built on lies, disinformation and Fascistic dogma.


Definition of socialism

1 : any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
2a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property
b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state
3 : a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done


https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/socialism
 
I do not think most ReTrumplicans see that its about the degree, they seem to play a 0 sum game, making the ignorant claim that any level of socialism is unacceptable.

False and a total straw man bordering more on a flat out lie
 
I do not think most ReTrumplicans see that its about the degree, they seem to play a 0 sum game, making the ignorant claim that any level of socialism is unacceptable.

What you don't think and reality are two different things. The Constitution itself describes a limited number of socialism.
 
Duh. Of course, economics are far more important than people's lives, if you're a Reichwinger.

There you go with the demonization, lol.

Isn't economics an important part of people's lives? If it wasn't we wouldn't have any type of transportation except shoes.
 
In other words. The racist white man has touting that socialism is bad because it helps Blacks.

Lets be real.
 
Why is Trump using the Federal Government to tell private companies if they can or cannot fly airplanes they own?

These are private corporations who own these airplanes... Should they not be free to make the choice?

Depends upon how many FEDERAL REGULATIONS these corporations are ignoring in order to turn a profit. FYI: Its not socialism to enforce the preexisting laws and regulations. As far as freedom goes....the freedom does not belong to the one's selling a product or service....THE FREEDOM BELONGS TO THE ONE WHO FREELY DECIDES TO USE THAT PRODUCT OR SERVICE...its called free market capitalism. Another enlightened social liberal? Some logic or the lack thereof.

Why is it.... every liberal that posts on this board....BEGINS AND ENDS WITH A FALSE PREMISE? The false premise being......anyone can choose to ignore laws and regulations because they are free to do as much....and its socialism to enforce those laws and regulations in a preemptive manner.
 
Last edited:
What you don't think and reality are two different things. The Constitution itself describes a limited number of socialism.

"The Constitution itself describes a limited number of socialism."

Can anyone tell me what that sentence means?
 
The main reason that Boeing or the airlines are not going to do anything other than take a bite of the big ole shit sandwich that DJ TRUMP has made? Greed, Money, future contracts.....yada, yada, That's the reason capitalism rules the world. THE GOLDEN RULE......he who owns the gold make the rules.
 
Depends upon how many FEDERAL REGULATIONS these corporations are ignoring in order to turn a profit. FYI: Its not socialism to enforce the preexisting laws and regulations. As far as freedom goes....the freedom does not belong to the one's selling a product or service....THE FREEDOM BELONGS TO THE ONE WHO FREELY DECIDES TO USE THAT PRODUCT OR SERVICE...its called free market capitalism. Another enlightened social liberal? Some logic or the lack thereof.

Why is it.... every liberal that posts on this board....BEGINS AND ENDS WITH A FALSE PREMISE? The false premise being......anyone can choose to ignore laws and regulations because they are free to do as much....and its socialism to enforce those laws and regulations in a preemptive manner.

"Its not socialism to enforce the preexisting laws and regulations." - Uh, if the preexisting laws and regulations are socialist in nature it sure is! Are you a total idiot?
 
The main reason that Boeing or the airlines are not going to do shit but eat the sandwich that DJ TRUMP has made? Greed, Money, future contracts.....yada, yada, That's the reason capitalism rules the world.

Oh, and its the law that if the FAA grounds you, you are grounded.
 
"Its not socialism to enforce the preexisting laws and regulations." - Uh, if the preexisting laws and regulations are socialist in nature it sure is! Are you a total idiot?

Question? Is it the duty of the Chief Law Enforcement Officer/Commander in Chief in the land to make new laws or enforce preexisting laws? Unlike BHO...….laws are made to be enforced by the executive branch not created void of REPRESENTATION. Like it or not....he's your president as well as mine.....he is to enforce the laws void of prejudice to any political ideology. If the laws are SOCIALIST/COMMUNIST...why not ask the supposed representatives that drafted them?

Again.....why do all communist/socialist/liberals/progressive.....begin and end with a false premise? Is it because you are so smart and everyone else is so dumb? :dunno:
 
Back
Top