Trump trolls in West Virginia: 'Are there any Russians here tonight, any Russians?'

anatta said:
Krauthammer -a #neverTrump was saying the same thing.
we are entering dangerous waters where DeepState / leaks / Special Prosecutors run wild can overturn the will of the people.

elections come and go but a stable Constitutional government only exists if it reflects the will of the people
Click to expand...

Trump was never the will of the people, he lost the election in a three million vote landslide. He is an unelected coup leader.
 
Trump is an illegitimately installed dictator. He has already annulled the election and seized power. Any means are justified in removing him from office and restoring the rule of the American people over themselves again. We will never again have an unelected "president".
 
Amadeus said:
Logical fallacy spotted. Identity: Appeal to Ridicule.

This is an attempt to deflate a legitimate argument and investigation (e.g. collusion with Putin) by presenting the argument in an absurd way ("Any Russians here in West Virginia?").

Also, not sure who Trump is actually trolling. West Virginians? Russians?

Regardless, we know that Russians troll Trump better -- such as when they just recently called him weak, humiliated, and outwitted.
Click to expand...

Trump was mocking the Russian gig lol.

You're reading too much into it.
 
Mr. Worldwide said:
Trump was never the will of the people, he lost the election in a three million vote landslide. He is an unelected coup leader.
Click to expand...

Kockjammer is entering dangerous waters where plumbing leaks will overturn his wheelchair. Anything but the merits. Deflect. This is about real electoral meddling by a foreign power.
Sorry that it incidentally undermines the orange fraud. Too bad. It's not stopping.
 
Mr. Worldwide said:
Trump is an illegitimately installed dictator. He has already annulled the election and seized power. Any means are justified in removing him from office and restoring the rule of the American people over themselves again. We will never again have an unelected "president".
Click to expand...

Id say that position is a good tonic for the gin that this investigation is just partisan BS. Continue balancing the scales.
 
Here is the most accurate map of the election:

LhPylFU.jpg


Precisely 0 Americas voted for Trump.
 
The Democrats are civilization. The Republicans are barbarism, ignorance, and populism. All that is good about America is represented in the Democrats. All that is evil is represented in the Republicans. They are animals, content with nothing besides being racist filth and swine, and do not qualify as human beings. Death to rightists!
 
Mr. Worldwide said:
The Democrats are civilization. The Republicans are barbarism, ignorance, and populism. All that is good about America is represented in the Democrats. All that is evil is represented in the Republicans. They are animals, content with nothing besides being racist filth and swine, and do not qualify as human beings. Death to rightists!
Click to expand...

I may start a news network featuring you. Are you handsome with thick hair, a strong chin and can you lie constantly without laughing if I pay you 200K an "episode" You can be my anchor tenant in the antiFox machine
 
anatta said:
ah.. now we're back to treasonous bloviations..we don't know where, we don't know how, but we know it's a fact
Click to expand...


You were the one saying it was NATO's fault that Putin invaded the territories of the sovereign state of Ukraine, were you not?

That might not be the legal definition of treason. But blaming NATO for a Russian dictators military invasions of neighboring sovereign states certainly fits the spirit of treason, no?


So shall we dispense with the legalistic navel-gazing about what actually constitutes treason?
 
Cypress said:
You were the one saying it was NATO's fault that Putin invaded the territories of the sovereign state of Ukraine, were you not?

That might not be the legal definition of treason. But blaming NATO for a Russian dictators military invasions of neighboring sovereign states certainly fits the spirit of treason, no?


So shall we dispense with the legalistic navel-gazing about what actually constitutes treason?
Click to expand...
Not NATO.
US meddling in their Euromaiden. U.S.A.I.D. grants. Nuland's desk in particular.

NATO expansion is the long time set up that inevitably drives strategies:

Meet the Americans Who Put Together the Coup in Kiev
http://readersupportednews.org/opin...e-americans-who-put-together-the-coup-in-kiev
Harder for some people to grasp, Ambassador Pyatt and his team did not create the foreign policy, which was – and is – only minimally about overthrowing Ukraine's duly elected government to "promote democracy." Ever since Bill Clinton sat in the Oval Office, Washington and its European allies have worked openly and covertly to extend NATO to the Russian border and Black Sea Fleet, provoking a badly wounded Russian bear. They have also worked to bring Ukraine and its Eastern European neighbors into the neoliberal economy of the West, isolating the Russians rather than trying to bring them into the fold. Except for sporadic resets, anti-Russian has become the new anti-Soviet, and "strategic containment" has been the wonky word for encircling Russia with our military and economic power.

Nor did neoconservatives create the policy, no matter how many progressive pundits blame them for it. NED provides cushy jobs for old social democrats born again as neocons. Pyatt's boss, Victoria Nuland, is the wife and fellow-traveler of historian Robert Kagan, one of the movement's leading lights. And neocons are currently beating the war drums against Russia, as much to scupper any agreements on Syria and Iran as to encourage more Pentagon contracts for their friends and financial backers. But, encircling Russia has never been just a neocon thing. The policy has bi-partisan and trans-Atlantic support, including the backing of America's old-school nationalists, Cold War liberals, Hillary hawks, and much of Obama's national security team.

 
Last edited:
Mr. Worldwide said:
By voting for Trump, West Virginia effectively became a province of Russia and ceased to be American. Let's take it back and enforce military rule on it, America's Russian conquest. The West Virginians are not capable of ruling themselves and need to be civilized like the dogs they are.
Click to expand...

You defeat "fascism" by promoting fascism against one of the United States of America? Really? That's mighty white of you.


A few facts about those West Virginians that are not capable of ruling themselves. 1. It is the only state that declared independence from another state in voting to RULE THEMSELVES as opposed to the Virginia DEMOCRAT policy of engaging in FLESH PEDDLING/SLAVERY. The only state to be appointed as a state by presidential proclamation. 2. They are the first to serve with the most causalities in times of armed conflicts. The dangerous job of providing coal to produce electricity has resulted in more mining deaths than any other state in the union. Coal is used to produce over 40% of the world's electricity 3. Wva. was the only place where the US military was used against US CITIZENS other than the civil war. The battle of Blair Mountain in Logan Co.....when the miners fought against the corrupt coal owners and police forces of that county.

4. Wva. is the state where mothers day was first observed at Andrews Church in Grafton Wva.

5. The location of the first 4-H club in America....Jackson's Mill Wva. 6. A Wva native holds the records in high school basketball for scoring the most points in a game....135 points.

7. The 1st female prison location 8. The first land battle in the civil war. 9. The location of Bridge Day.....observed primarily by base jumpers. 10. One of the lowest crime rates in the nation

11. The first rural "free" mail delivery service. 12. The first steam boat launch on the Potomac River. 13. The place where outdoor advertising was invented....as a tobacco company paid farmers to paint their barns and buildings with tobacco advertising.

12. The first publication designed to target WOMEN was published in Wva. in 1824 13. Location of the first electric rail system.... 14. The first union soldier killed in the Civil War. 15. THE FIRST BLACK FEMALE EVER VOTED TO SERVE ON A STATE LEGISLATION....WAS IN WVA.

Just a few facts about those ignorant West Virginians that you so "fascistically" want to rule over.

Talk about a pot calling a kettle black. LMAO
 
anatta said:
Not NATO.
US meddling in their Euromaiden. U.S.A.I.D. grants. Nuland's desk in particular.

NATO expansion is the long time set up that inevitably drives strategies:

Meet the Americans Who Put Together the Coup in Kiev
http://readersupportednews.org/opin...e-americans-who-put-together-the-coup-in-kiev
Harder for some people to grasp, Ambassador Pyatt and his team did not create the foreign policy, which was – and is – only minimally about overthrowing Ukraine's duly elected government to "promote democracy." Ever since Bill Clinton sat in the Oval Office, Washington and its European allies have worked openly and covertly to extend NATO to the Russian border and Black Sea Fleet, provoking a badly wounded Russian bear. They have also worked to bring Ukraine and its Eastern European neighbors into the neoliberal economy of the West, isolating the Russians rather than trying to bring them into the fold. Except for sporadic resets, anti-Russian has become the new anti-Soviet, and "strategic containment" has been the wonky word for encircling Russia with our military and economic power.

Nor did neoconservatives create the policy, no matter how many progressive pundits blame them for it. NED provides cushy jobs for old social democrats born again as neocons. Pyatt's boss, Victoria Nuland, is the wife and fellow-traveler of historian Robert Kagan, one of the movement's leading lights. And neocons are currently beating the war drums against Russia, as much to scupper any agreements on Syria and Iran as to encourage more Pentagon contracts for their friends and financial backers. But, encircling Russia has never been just a neocon thing. The policy has bi-partisan and trans-Atlantic support, including the backing of America's old-school nationalists, Cold War liberals, Hillary hawks, and much of Obama's national security team.
Click to expand...


You can search the depths of the interwebs to find obscure websites no one has ever heard of to support anything you claim.

Frankly, I am still somewhat taken aback that your view is NATO is to blame for Putin invading the sovereign territory of a neighboring state. I can see why people think you are a Russian bot.

You seem to either forget, or simply not care, that the hard-won peace after world war 2 was predicated on a new paradigm of international law that you cannot invade anyone, you cannot commit aggression, and you can only use your military to defend yourself. Wars of aggression were codified in international law as being illegal.

Respect for international law, and international norms of conduct were among the reasons I was against both the United States invasion of Iraq, and the Russian invasions of Georgia, Crimea, and eastern Ukraine. I try to be consistent.

You appear to only excuse wars of aggression if they are committed by the Kremlin. I find that very inconsistent, strange, and it has more than a whiff of treason to it.
 
Cypress said:
You can search the depths of the interwebs to find obscure websites no one has ever heard of to support anything you claim.

Frankly, I am still somewhat taken aback that your view is NATO is to blame for Putin invading the sovereign territory of a neighboring state. I can see why people think you are a Russian bot.
Respect for international law, and international norms of conduct were among the reasons I was against both the United States invasion of Iraq, and the Russian invasions of Georgia, Crimea, and eastern Ukraine. I try to be consistent.

You appear to only excuse wars of aggression if they are committed by the Kremlin. I find that very inconsistent, strange, and it has more than a whiff of treason to it.
Click to expand...
It's only obscure to you if you don't see the significance of western financed TV being key parts of the Orange Revolution giving it legitimacy and rally over any other factions.
The same deal with Yanukovych :
For Pyatt the payoff came on November 21, when President Yanukovych pulled back from an Association Agreement with the European Union. Within hours Hromadske TV went online and one of its journalists set the spark that brought Yanukovych down.

Enter a lonely, courageous Ukrainian rebel, a leading investigative journalist," writes Snyder. "A dark-skinned journalist who gets racially profiled by the regime. And a Muslim. And an Afghan.
This is Mustafa Nayem, the man who started the revolution. Using social media, he called students and other young people to rally on the main square of Kiev in support of a European choice for Ukraine."

All credit to Nayem for his undeniable courage. But bad, bad history.
Snyder fails to mention that Pyatt, Soros, and the Dutch had put Web TV at the uprising's disposal. Without their joint funding of Hromadske and its streaming video from the Euromaidan, the revolution might never have been televised and Yanukovych might have crushed the entire effort before it gained traction.
Click to expand...

You seem to either forget, or simply not care, that the hard-won peace after world war 2 was predicated on a new paradigm of international law that you cannot invade anyone, you cannot commit aggression, and you can only use your military to defend yourself. Wars of aggression were codified in international law as being illegal.
Click to expand...
Look at the Budapest Memorandum:

The memorandum included security assurances against threats or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine, Belarus and Kazakhstan.
++

we were meddling in their political integrity.
When we did that all bets were off as to how it was gonna play out.
 
tsuke said:
wierd. i dont recall the last time a governor just switched parties in the middle of his term.

can he do that? surely the DNC spent money to get him elected.
Click to expand...

Well, I'm sure it's not illegal.

Maybe it broke some party rules or whatever, but who is the DNC to complain about breaking rules? Joe Manchin may not be far behind him.
 
Darth Omar said:
Well, I'm sure it's not illegal.

Maybe it broke some party rules or whatever, but who is the DNC to complain about breaking rules? Joe Manchin may not be far behind him.
Click to expand...

Funny.... some can't remember anyone "switching parties"....but some would take a polygraph to defend the political urban legend concerning all those senators and congressmen that SWITCHED PARTIES and ideologies in the 60s when the democrats became the defenders of civil rights and anti- JIM CROW and moved north while those evil ass Republican's became bigots, racists..etc. and moved SOUTH....after 100 years working to give women the right to vote, blacks the right to vote and own property, combating Jim Crow and bigotry by prosecuting the KKK. It was a magical decade....the left became right and the right became left...if you purchase into the propaganda and revisionist history from the DNC.

Reality: Only one representative switched parties during that time line.:palm: You know who is a lair and the father of lies? Another lefty anarchist.......I believe his name was Saul Alinsky.....no, no I always get those 2 mixed up...it was Satan. They call the LEFT the LEFT for a reason....most liars will be seated on the left of our Lord at judgment...just ask Saul Alinsky who was quoted as defending Satan, "I'd rather rule in hell than serve in heaven"...lies are just a means to political end, that end justifies the means. LIES are the number one tool of the left.

WE ARE MARSHALL.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top