evince
Truthmatters
No. There is no one in their right mind no matter what their political leanings that would accept that coward anywhere.
Charleston?
No. There is no one in their right mind no matter what their political leanings that would accept that coward anywhere.
the libertarians are childish fools
their ideas prohibit any large size
I don't think it will be them
I believe it will grow out of the independent voters
they will coalese and find a name to consolidate power
the Independent whatevers
Charleston?
No. There is no one in their right mind no matter what their political leanings that would accept that coward anywhere.
Stephen Miller is as bad and worse as any racist on this board .. and he is in the Trump Administration.
Who does he think he is with the brother/sister crap? Maybe Uncle Remus?That too is quite possible good sister.
But at some point, they will have to be led and organized .. and when you're talking about independents who are all over the place politically .. that could be like herding cats.
Who does he think he is with the brother/sister crap? Maybe Uncle Remus?
Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
you cant understand
you are sociopathic
That too is quite possible good sister.
But at some point, they will have to be led and organized .. and when you're talking about independents who are all over the place politically .. that could be like herding cats.
Many politicians are, including the HillBillys!!you cant understand
you are sociopathic
so you are telling me about black voters powers in the Democratic party? *duh* is this something new?"breeding' .. 'competitive ideas' .. you are a moron.
African-Americans only makeup about 13% of the American population. We gained power by what? BREEDING???
Competitive ideas?????
TIME: Donald Trump Has the Lowest Approval Rating in History After One Year
http://time.com/5103776/donald-trump-approval-rating-graph/
DONALD TRUMP’S APPROVAL RATING HITS NEW RECORD LOW, MAKING HIM THE MOST UNPOPULAR PRESIDENT IN POLL HISTORY
http://www.newsweek.com/donald-trum...w-record-low-making-him-most-unpopular-741916
Poll: Under Trump, global approval of U.S. leadership hits historical low
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/01/18/trump-global-leadership-polls-344989
Who is to judge these competitive ideas? You?
You're just another dumb ass example of why the Republican Party is dying.
^ is spot on..you aren't claiming any superior ideas- you (OP) are claiming demographics leads to power.what a dreary way to gain political power....by breeding,, certainly not competitive ideas..
Many politicians are, including the HillBillys!!
http://dailycaller.com/2017/09/20/trump-may-be-a-narcissist-but-the-clintons-are-sociopaths/
Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
so you are telling me about black voters powers in the Democratic party? *duh* is this something new?
++
Since you have an inability to read and respond to posts - ill make it simple for you .
The OP is claiming demographics are a key reason the " old dead white guys (whatever)" party is doomed right?
NOTE: it's not talking about Trumps numbers now which you have a propensity to post on ANY discussion-
rather the fact that demographics are the wave of the future..blah blah..
I read the OP and aside from the usual cries of raycist blah blah -that's what it says.
so my comment:
^ is spot on..you aren't claiming any superior ideas- you (OP) is claiming demographics leads to power.
the rest of you nauseating insults are ignored..my point stands..
( and now you get to tell me about Trumps poll numbers and "raycists white people" are why he was elected.
SOS, BAC.. same no ideas from Dems
A Republican intellectual explains why the Republican Party is going to die
Avik Roy is a Republican’s Republican. A health care wonk and editor at Forbes, he has worked for three Republican presidential hopefuls — Mitt Romney, Rick Perry, and Marco Rubio. Much of his adult life has been dedicated to advancing the Republican Party and conservative ideals.
But when I caught up with Roy at a bar just outside the Republican convention, he said something I’ve never heard from an establishment conservative before: The Grand Old Party is going to die.
“I don’t think the Republican Party and the conservative movement are capable of reforming themselves in an incremental and gradual way,” he said. “There’s going to be a disruption.”
Roy isn’t happy about this: He believes it means the Democrats will dominate national American politics for some time. But he also believes the Republican Party has lost its right to govern, because it is driven by white nationalism rather than a true commitment to equality for all Americans.
“Until the conservative movement can stand up and live by that principle, it will not have the moral authority to lead the country,” he told me.
His history of conservatism was a Greek tragedy. It begins with a fatal error in 1964, survived on the willful self-delusion of people like Roy himself, and ended with Donald Trump.
“I think the conservative movement is fundamentally broken,” Roy tells me. “Trump is not a random act. This election is not a random act.”
Goldwater opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1964. He himself was not especially racist — he believed it was wrong, on free market grounds, for the federal government to force private businesses to desegregate. But this “principled” stance identified the GOP with the pro-segregation camp in everyone’s eyes, while the Democrats under Lyndon Johnson became the champions of anti-racism.
This had a double effect, Roy says. First, it forced black voters out of the GOP. Second, it invited in white racists who had previously been Democrats. Even though many Republicans voted for the Civil Rights Act in Congress, the post-Goldwater party became the party of aggrieved whites.
“The fact is, today, the Republican coalition has inherited the people who opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 — the Southern Democrats who are now Republicans,” Roy says. “Conservatives and Republicans have not come to terms with that problem.”
“Conservative intellectuals, and conservative politicians, have been in kind of a bubble,” Roy says. “We’ve had this view that the voters were with us on conservatism — philosophical, economic conservatism. In reality, the gravitational center of the Republican Party is white nationalism.”
He expands on this idea: “It’s a common observation on the left, but it’s an observation that a lot of us on the right genuinely believed wasn’t true — which is that conservatism has become, and has been for some time, much more about white identity politics than it has been about conservative political philosophy. I think today, even now, a lot of conservatives have not come to terms with that problem.”
This, Roy believes, is where the conservative intellectual class went astray. By refusing to admit the truth about their own party, they were powerless to stop the forces that led to Donald Trump’s rise. They told themselves, over and over again, that Goldwater’s victory was a triumph.
But in reality, it created the conditions under which Trump could thrive. Trump’s politics of aggrieved white nationalism — labeling black people criminals, Latinos rapists, and Muslims terrorists — succeeded because the party’s voting base was made up of the people who once opposed civil rights.
“[Trump] tapped into something that was latent in the Republican Party and conservative movement — but a lot of people in the conservative movement didn’t notice,” Roy concludes, glumly.
For conservatism to live, the conservative movement has to die
The Republican Party, and the conservative movement that propped it up, is doomed.
Both are too wedded to the politics of white nationalism to change how they act, but that just isn’t a winning formula in a nation that’s increasingly black and brown. Either the Republican Party will eat itself or a new party will rise and overtake its voting share.
For the entire history of modern conservatism, its ideals have been wedded to and marred by white supremacism. That’s Roy’s own diagnosis, and I think it’s correct. As a result, we have literally no experience in America of a politically viable conservative movement unmoored from white supremacy.
https://www.vox.com/2016/7/25/12256510/republican-party-trump-avik-roy
The HillBillys are certainly not poor, not now anyway, and they are definitely full on sociopaths.that is a trash site idiot
your whole platform is about hating the poor
so you are telling me about black voters powers in the Democratic party? *duh* is this something new?
++
Since you have an inability to read and respond to posts - ill make it simple for you .
The OP is claiming demographics are the key reason the " old dead white guys (whatever)" party is doomed right?
NOTE: it's not talking about Trumps numbers now which you have a propensity to post on ANY discussion-
rather the fact that demographics are the wave of the future..blah blah..
I read the OP and aside from the usual cries of raycist blah blah -that's what it says.
so my comment:
^ is spot on..you aren't claiming any superior ideas- you (OP) are claiming demographics leads to power.
the rest of you nauseating insults are ignored..my point stands..
( and now you get to tell me about Trumps poll numbers and "raycists white people" are why he was elected.)
SOS, BAC.. same no ideas from Dems
Since I'm sitting at home doing nothing because i'm watching my daughter while the wife is out I'll respond, if that is ok.
As a Republican I have the same concerns. It's why I didn't vote for Trump because unlike Reagan who brought people into the Republican Party I believe Trump turns them away. I'm afraid of the long term damage he is doing to the party. I saw first hand what Prop 187 did to Republicans in California (even though a number of Democrats voted for it).
On the other hand the OP says nothing about the Democrats ability to govern. Yes certain groups lean Democratic but to assume they will always vote that way regardless of the job being done (on a national level) is not a given imo.
I asked my buddy who is second or third generation Latino how offensive he found Trump. He said he didn't care but new arrivals do. I'm not articulating this the best but it's the point Grind has made before that as people integrate themselves more as American it's possible they don't vote strictly on their race or ethnicity.
I guess at age 45 I'm old enough to be very cynical politically and having seen books from both the Republican and Democratic side about their coming majorities and seeing them both be wrong I'm not ready to buy into another one of those predictions.
SHOCKING- the racist points a finger and says blah blah blah, racist racist racist.
Yawn...
uh huh.... the stupid just keeps on rolling out of you.