How Mary Jo Kopechne was a victim of the Kennedys TWICE

Neither of us KNOWS that. The only difference between us on that issue is: I am willing to acknowledge that I do not know it...and you you are not willing to do so.

According to witnesses, he had at least six rum and cokes and two heinekens between 4:30 and 11:15

I would bet that if if he took a breathalyzer he would have blown at least a 0.08 which by today’s standards would be legally drunk.

Also, the mere fact of leaving the scene automatically increases suspicion that the driver was drinking.

I also suspect that isn’t a full accounting of what he drank that day.

Lastly, did you know that Teddy’s chauffeur was on the island? Why didn’t Teddy just have the chauffeur drive Mary Jo back? Why did he have to do it?

Why was there a party for five married guys and five single women?

Based on the known timeline, there is an hour that is unaccounted for.

Here is what I think happened. This is my opinion and I know libtards will cry foul over it, but I don’t care

1) Mary Jo wanted to leave and Teddy offered to drive her
2) They had sex. I believe this is the reason that an autopsy was never done. It would have discovered that Mary Jo had sex. That would have been a huge scandal for both families.
3) While driving Mary Jo back to the ferry or the cottage, Kennedy encountered Deputy Sheriff Christopher Look who testified to seeing Teddy’s car at 12:45.
4) After seeing the sheriffs car, Teddy panicked. He was drunk, didn’t have a license, is in a car in the middle of the night with a single woman AND he had a long history of irresponsible behavior.
5) He took off trying to get away and lost control of the car and killed Mary Jo
6) the coverup begins
 
He fits under the second for driving drunk

It was vehicular homicide.
There was no intent to kill,
in fact, it can't be proven beyond a reasonable doubt that he even knew she was in the car.
Like I used to say to Yurt, glad you are not my lawyer.
 
According to witnesses, he had at least six rum and cokes and two heinekens between 4:30 and 11:15

I would bet that if if he took a breathalyzer he would have blown at least a 0.08 which by today’s standards would be legally drunk.

Also, the mere fact of leaving the scene automatically increases suspicion that the driver was drinking.

I also suspect that isn’t a full accounting of what he drank that day.

Lastly, did you know that Teddy’s chauffeur was on the island? Why didn’t Teddy just have the chauffeur drive Mary Jo back? Why did he have to do it?

Why was there a party for five married guys and five single women?

Based on the known timeline, there is an hour that is unaccounted for.

Here is what I think happened. This is my opinion and I know libtards will cry foul over it, but I don’t care

1) Mary Jo wanted to leave and Teddy offered to drive her
2) They had sex. I believe this is the reason that an autopsy was never done. It would have discovered that Mary Jo had sex. That would have been a huge scandal for both families.
3) While driving Mary Jo back to the ferry or the cottage, Kennedy encountered Deputy Sheriff Christopher Look who testified to seeing Teddy’s car at 12:45.
4) After seeing the sheriffs car, Teddy panicked. He was drunk, didn’t have a license, is in a car in the middle of the night with a single woman AND he had a long history of irresponsible behavior.
5) He took off trying to get away and lost control of the car and killed Mary Jo
6) the coverup begins

I have absolutely no problem with what you think or guess happened.

My comment had to do with what Yaya...KNOWS.
 
The official cause of death listed by the coroner was "drowning" and the undertaker disagreed and guessed "suffocation"was more likely.
Both are pure conjecture as her body was never autopsied.

Tom latched on to this disparity of expert opinion to imply that she may have been purposely suffocated before being submerged.
No one would expect a body to be "full of water" in a car that was not completely submerged.

Tom hates all things Kennedy and may say anything.
Poor Tom.
Poor Sailor.

Another limpwristed attempt at trying to save yourself from being absofuckinglutely wrong again. Your stupidity is astounding. So tell me there "Doctor", how many drowning victims have you actually seen? The only thing for sure here is you would never experience a dry drowning. You have no gag reflex.
 
According to witnesses, he had at least six rum and cokes and two heinekens between 4:30 and 11:15

I would bet that if if he took a breathalyzer he would have blown at least a 0.08 which by today’s standards would be legally drunk.

Also, the mere fact of leaving the scene automatically increases suspicion that the driver was drinking.

I also suspect that isn’t a full accounting of what he drank that day.

Lastly, did you know that Teddy’s chauffeur was on the island? Why didn’t Teddy just have the chauffeur drive Mary Jo back? Why did he have to do it?

Why was there a party for five married guys and five single women?

Based on the known timeline, there is an hour that is unaccounted for.

Here is what I think happened. This is my opinion and I know libtards will cry foul over it, but I don’t care

1) Mary Jo wanted to leave and Teddy offered to drive her
2) They had sex. I believe this is the reason that an autopsy was never done. It would have discovered that Mary Jo had sex. That would have been a huge scandal for both families.
3) While driving Mary Jo back to the ferry or the cottage, Kennedy encountered Deputy Sheriff Christopher Look who testified to seeing Teddy’s car at 12:45.
4) After seeing the sheriffs car, Teddy panicked. He was drunk, didn’t have a license, is in a car in the middle of the night with a single woman AND he had a long history of irresponsible behavior.
5) He took off trying to get away and lost control of the car and killed Mary Jo
6) the coverup begins

You suck at math.
8 drinks over 7 hours.
280 pound man.
Legal drunkenness at that time; .10
Sorry Charlie.
Try again.
 
Another limpwristed attempt at trying to save yourself from being absofuckinglutely wrong again. Your stupidity is astounding. So tell me there "Doctor", how many drowning victims have you actually seen? The only thing for sure here is you would never experience a dry drowning. You have no gag reflex.

Since there was no autopsy, WTF are you talking about, Cap?
 
Since there was no autopsy, WTF are you talking about, Cap?

Who here is more qualified than the coroner that gave the cause of death? Certainly no one googling the wrong definitions of drowning. Oh, and by the way, any idea why there was no autopsy?
 
Who here is more qualified than the coroner that gave the cause of death? Certainly no one googling the wrong definitions of drowning. Oh, and by the way, any idea why there was no autopsy?

Without an autopsy the Coroner could only guess.
 
You shut the fuck up Norsetwat. My daughter-in-law is from Saigon and her family can give you chapter and verse on the brutality of the Vietminh. The Democrats have blood on their hands over Vietnam and Cambodia, that's just undeniable.

Anyway what does 'American boys' have to do with it? The funding was pulled in 1975 after the GIs went home and the South Vietnamese left to soldier on.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk

Stick a fork up your ass.
How is Cambodia the Dems fault if Nixon bombed them in secret?
Fucksause
 
A comment on Time-Traveling Deplorables...

Tough, smart, creative, compassionate - a rare combination of qualities for a leader.

Trump only talks tough, and you love him.

You gotta take the psychology of the deplorable wingnut into account in the context of this thread.

The modern Democratic party has elected two reasonably successful and competent two term presidents, who both left office with high approval ratings, and will both be judged reasonably well by history.

What else can the party of George Dumbya-Donald Trump-Dick Cheney-Sarah Palin do, except hop in the time machine and time travel back half a century or more to complain about Kennedy, LBJ, or Robert Byrd?
 
Runeatic up to his usual tricks, there is no way Ted Kennedy weighed 20 stone back in 1969. Pretty sure that he had a lot more than that to drink, anywhere else but Massachusetts and he'd have been charged with manslaughter at the very least.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
Who here is more qualified than the coroner that gave the cause of death? Certainly no one googling the wrong definitions of drowning. Oh, and by the way, any idea why there was no autopsy?
The body was whisked away to a Pennsylvania funeral home, for fairly obvious reasons.

The DA in Massachusetts later applied for court order in Pennsylvania to have her body exhumed so that an autopsy could be performed. Despite a Martha’s Vineyard medical examiner’s stating that she had drowned, many remained sceptical. This included the diver who pulled her from the car, who argued Kopechne suffocated after oxygen ran out of an air pocket she was breathing in the car.





Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
Ted did more for the US than the rest of his brothers and their criminal fathet combined.
No other politician in history did as much for the poor and vulnerable in this country than Ted Kennedy.

I have been message boarding for over a decade, and I never cease to be amazed at how many threads deplorables have started complaining about Kennedy, LBJ, Robert Byrd, the southern Dixiecrats.

Their obsession with time traveling is remarkable!

I almost never see a liberal start threads about Herbert Hoover, Joe McCarthy, Richard Nixon, Jesse Helms.

This affinity for clinging to events that happened in the days of our parents and grandparents is....freakishly weird! My assumptions are either that the average age of these time-traveling deplorables is about 86....or, the glory days of their party have long since been eclipsed by the modern Democratic party of Bill Clinton and Barack Obama.
 
Back
Top