Tell me what why was broken by trying to cover up a Hollywood tape
What the United States Attorney is looking for and why?
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
Tell me what why was broken by trying to cover up a Hollywood tape
Chief Judge for the Southern District of New York is (shocker) a Clinton appointee:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colleen_McMahon
Leonthecat
Racism Watchdog
Sweet.
Yup he is so Rick soild
The Wrong Man
In the fall of 2001, a nation reeling from the horror of 9/11 was rocked by a series of deadly anthrax attacks. As the pressure to find a culprit mounted, the FBI, abetted by the media, found one. The wrong one. This is the story of how federal authorities blew the biggest anti-terror investigation of the past decade—and nearly destroyed an innocent man. Here, for the first time, the falsely accused, Dr. Steven J. Hatfill, speaks out about his ordeal.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/308019/
From the CNN article, the warrant allowed them to search for communications between Trump and Cohen with regards to the access Hollywood video. For a judge to allow that, there must be some evidence of discussion between Trump and Cohen that is not covered under the attorney-client privilege and is evidence of a crime.
I don’t know, that’s what we are discussing on this thread.
It was not the chief judge Who signed this warrant.
Irish Exit
Verified User
It may not be the smoking gun of information you are hoping it to be. Warrants are generally not particularly informative as far as facts.
What were discussing now is not something being pursued by Mueller.
What 'crime' would that be counselor ?
I don’t know, that is what we are discussing here.
The application for the warrant would be... and it will become public when the investigation is over.
canceled.2021.1
#AMERICAISDEAD
Wow. Mueller must really be failing at the Russian collusion thing.
If this is all you have forget about it.
Let me go on record as saying it would be expected that Trump would try to stop the release of the tape. So the fuck what douche bag?
1) nobody said it’s all they got.
2) the question is not if he tried to stop the tape, it is if he tried to do something criminal in his effort to stop the tape.
Irish Exit
Verified User
Years from now, maybe, possibly. The federal courts are split on this and New York dodged the question. The application could also have something as generic as, "According to a confidential informant with whom the investigator has worked in the past who has previously provided accurate information whom the investigator finds highly credible..."
Don't a judge have to be informed of a 'specific crime' and reasonable proof to allow a warrant to be issued ?
No, they need to present probable cause of a crime.
Thats what I mean by 'reasonable proof', probable cause that a crime was committed....and EXACTLY what crime are we talking about.....
Don't tell me you can go to a judge and get a warrant that some unnamed crime might have been committed .... probably cause implys you know what the fuck crime you're
claiming was committed.....
crazy.....its like saying there was noise suspected to be a gunshot in this neighborhood so the cops have probably cause to search every home in said neighborhood for guns.....
Last edited:
