Trump freaking out about investigation.

I have to look at hem.
They are MS sources. But they slant,and omit as much as publish pure fake - just as bad.
NYTimes called themselves "advocacy journalism" ( whateverthe fuck that is supposed to mean during the campaign)

Stone is a flamboyant lunatic hawking his friendship wit Trump while throwing him under the bus.
He is 100% unreliable

Roger Stone says he's writing a book about President Trump's downfall from Russia probe

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ident-trumps-downfall-russia-probe/948416001/

Do they slant, some, no more than the WSJ, and most of that occurs on the opinion pages. If they "omit," given the length and depth of the news they cover, what in the hell does the majority of sources do then who don't even offer eight full pages of news?

You are showing you really don't have experience with either newspaper but regurgitating the same narrative the demogogues sell
 
Comey is such a weaselish liar I doubt if he's capable of teling the truth- and the screws are just starting to turn on Comey

Based upon his memos which Trump's advocates said were being held back deliberately because they'd expose a conspiracy, Comey is anything but a "liar"

And I said it before, say it again, it really cracks one up when a conservative accuses another of being a "liar" when their man in the White House has set Olympian records for flatout lying and fabricating
 
Comey is such a weaselish liar I doubt if he's capable of teling the truth- and the screws are just starting to turn on Comey

He’s not behaving like someone about to be captured in the net of a federal investigation, like Trump is.
 
Based upon his memos which Trump's advocates said were being held back deliberately because they'd expose a conspiracy, Comey is anything but a "liar"

And I said it before, say it again, it really cracks one up when a conservative accuses another of being a "liar" when their man in the White House has set Olympian records for flatout lying and fabricating

Conservatives really respect lying, a lot.
 
Do they slant, some, no more than the WSJ, and most of that occurs on the opinion pages. If they "omit," given the length and depth of the news they cover, what in the hell does the majority of sources do then who don't even offer eight full pages of news?

You are showing you really don't have experience with either newspaper but regurgitating the same narrative the demogogues sell
look dude. I was reading WAPO during the Nixon administration -back when they were a real newspaper with real investigative reports and not a Bezo's hit sheet. don't insult people when you don't know their reading habits.

I paid careful attention to breaking stories during the campaign. Inevitably the Trump "stories" got coverage after coverage, while Clinton foibles .fainting, and serial lying over her Emails were give a cursory read.

NYTime took the position Trump had to be stopped, a blogger let on they called them selves "advocacy journalism".

But at least the NYTimes covered Hillarys role of breaking down Libya - WAPO applauded her "smart power".
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/28/us/politics/hillary-clinton-libya.html?_r=0

Of the 2; I give NYTime more credence,but that's damning with faint praise
 
Based upon his memos which Trump's advocates said were being held back deliberately because they'd expose a conspiracy, Comey is anything but a "liar"

And I said it before, say it again, it really cracks one up when a conservative accuses another of being a "liar" when their man in the White House has set Olympian records for flatout lying and fabricating
Comey is not a con. If you can't figure that out, and his wife and daughters were at the pussy hat thing march-
you aren't paying attention. I have no idea what conspiracy you refer to. DoJ has to get blasted to release anything to Congress - i think Rosenweasel was threatened with impeachment to do so?
 
Not many people are making much of a deal about Trump asserting that he didn't think Cohen would "flip."

Think about that. He's not saying that Cohen doesn't have anything incriminating, or that he's happy to be transparent on everything - he's basically saying that Cohen COULD open up & that this wouldn't be a good thing.
 
Read what the RUSSIANS SAID. ... to make Trump look small.

According to Lavrov, Russia had been in contact with the coalition in the days leading up to the attack, dictating its “red lines” beyond which air strikes would be considered unacceptable
 
Not many people are making much of a deal about Trump asserting that he didn't think Cohen would "flip."

Think about that. He's not saying that Cohen doesn't have anything incriminating, or that he's happy to be transparent on everything - he's basically saying that Cohen COULD open up & that this wouldn't be a good thing.
targets often make shit up to avoid prosecution - it usually just winds up in more charges
but people are arrogant and think lying to prosecutors is no biggie
 
Most executives keep memos on phone conversations and meetings especially when you are dealing with someone who is unhinged like Trump.

Trump is just upset as usual.. The Russians announced they told Trump where he could bomb in Syria.

Cite your claim about Russia.
 
He’s not behaving like someone about to be captured in the net of a federal investigation, like Trump is.

Trump isn't behaving that way. He is responding to the left wing media who have essentially found him guilty based on no evidence. If the media is allowed to constantly talk about it, why do you ha e a problem with Trump talking about it, after all it is about him.

For that matter, you post about it far more than Trump tweets about it. What does that say about you?
 
he's on a book tour. he's so fucking delusional with a martyr's complex i doubt he's even aware/care

Maybe he’s comfortable that he will not be prosecuted? Maybe his secure in the knowledge she did nothing wrong. You don’t freak out about an investigation if you’re not Worried you’ll be convicted.
 
Comey is not a con. If you can't figure that out, and his wife and daughters were at the pussy hat thing march-
you aren't paying attention. I have no idea what conspiracy you refer to. DoJ has to get blasted to release anything to Congress - i think Rosenweasel was threatened with impeachment to do so?

Kellyanne Conway’s husband is not a Trump supporter, does that mean she’s not either?
 
Trump isn't behaving that way. He is responding to the left wing media who have essentially found him guilty based on no evidence. If the media is allowed to constantly talk about it, why do you ha e a problem with Trump talking about it, after all it is about him.

For that matter, you post about it far more than Trump tweets about it. What does that say about you?

It’s clear that the investigation has gotten into trumps head, he is completely freaking out.

Go watch the movie Nixon, While I believe much of that movie is fiction, I think Trump is going crazy like the Nixon cheractor did at the end of that movie… If Nixon used Twitter, you would’ve seen crazy tweets like Trump has been sending out.
 
It’s clear that the investigation has gotten into trumps head, he is completely freaking out.

Go watch the movie Nixon, While I believe much of that movie is fiction, I think Trump is going crazy like the Nixon cheractor did at the end of that movie… If Nixon used Twitter, you would’ve seen crazy tweets like Trump has been sending out.

You didn't answer my questions, why?

If you were under investigation by the state bar for stealing your clients money, are you telling me it be in your head? Or what if a female client accused you of sexual assault and her case was strong, that wouldn't bother you?
 
Back
Top