I have to look at hem.
They are MS sources. But they slant,and omit as much as publish pure fake - just as bad.
NYTimes called themselves "advocacy journalism" ( whateverthe fuck that is supposed to mean during the campaign)
Stone is a flamboyant lunatic hawking his friendship wit Trump while throwing him under the bus.
He is 100% unreliable
Roger Stone says he's writing a book about President Trump's downfall from Russia probe
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ident-trumps-downfall-russia-probe/948416001/
Do they slant, some, no more than the WSJ, and most of that occurs on the opinion pages. If they "omit," given the length and depth of the news they cover, what in the hell does the majority of sources do then who don't even offer eight full pages of news?
You are showing you really don't have experience with either newspaper but regurgitating the same narrative the demogogues sell