School Shootings

Today, 11:40 AM
Gotcha68
Verified User
This message is hidden because Gotcha68 is on your ignore list.

Need I say more?
 
what possible use would this have?

It'd make it simple for liberals in government to leak info to the liberal media, who'd doxx registered gun owners, so they could be targeted by crazies and thieves who want to steal guns and ammo.

It's already happened.

Guess why liberals want it nationwide?
 
Video games is a deflection. The fact is guns are available to those who are immature. I guess you can argue that anyone wanting guns is immature. Want to slow it down, then news stations should show the pictures of those who were shot. The horrible carnage is sanitized by not facing the real horror.

And New Stations should show executions of the nuts that commit mass murder
 
something has to be done.

Liberals won't let anything "be done".

They use these tragedies as political ammunition to bash their opponents, knowing full well that additional restrictions on guns don't stop murders and will only hamstring those who decide to comply with the law at any given moment.
 
Today, 11:40 AM
Gotcha68
Verified User
This message is hidden because Gotcha68 is on your ignore list.

Need I say more?

I wish otherwise intelligent people wouldn't do this.

If you want to put someone on "ignore", fine. Why advertise it? I suspect that many times posters who say "I have so-and-so on ignore" actually don't, or they'll log out to see what the other person posted anyway.

Just my opinion.
 
Liberals won't let anything "be done".

They use these tragedies as political ammunition to bash their opponents, knowing full well that additional restrictions on guns don't stop murders and will only hamstring those who decide to comply with the law at any given moment.

:lolup: :fofl2:

Versus ignoring these nearly-routine shootings and choosing to do nothing.

How do in-depth background checks, including mental health, tracking ownership of guns, product liability, etc. affect those who "comply with the law"? Just make you wait a little longer for your popgun?

This kid "complied with the law". That is, until he didn't.
 
This kid "complied with the law". That is, until he didn't.

He did? He took guns that didn't belong to him to school despite it being a gun-free zone, and committed illegal murders. Tell me which of your proposals for new laws would have prevented that?

I'll understand if you can't.
 
I wish otherwise intelligent people wouldn't do this.

If you want to put someone on "ignore", fine. Why advertise it? I suspect that many times posters who say "I have so-and-so on ignore" actually don't, or they'll log out to see what the other person posted anyway.

Just my opinion.

I do that to one person as a slap in the face. Is that breaking any rules?
 
Yeah, and you are wrong. School shootings did occur in your/our youth.

The other shootings betray your claim that the issue is generational. The problem is not limited to schools or young shooters. That narrative helps the far right conservative wackos that want to focus on video games, God in school or some other useless crap.

I am not sure what the answers are either but I know they are not going to be found in the simple minded and extremely tired "kids today" rhetoric of the right.

Jesus dude, you are way over thinking what I wrote as well as projecting. I said nothing about video games nor was I making a political statement.

I don't know how old you are but when I was younger we didn't have school shooting drills at school. Not did we have media coverage like we do today. Again, just facts nothing political. Do your liberal thing but don't try and call me out with your projecting/
 
I am totally for much stronger gun control, ban assault weapons, massive education and vetting and training of anyone, registration, testing, heck I think we should require
special insurance. I think if it was doable all ammo should be biomarked to the owner. There is little I would not be comfortable with...

More guns make us safer.
 
I didn't say or imply that it was.

Just my opinion.

Don't like it? Too bad.

No sport I was being polite and explaining why I did the ignore thing. I could have just told you to get fucked it was none of your business. No offense meant.
But we have one thing in common Jade Dragon appears to dislike you.
 
So you think these kid's go on a killing spree for their moment of fame. If you really believe that then you are ef-ed in the head.


http://www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-mass-shooters-fame-infamy-20151002-story.html

I never said video games were the sole problem but many mental health officials believe they do play a part in the overall picture. But if you want to ignore the data have a nut.


There is no support for your claims. As video games have grown in popularity violent crime rates have fallen. There is more support for the idea that it reduces violence.
 
Jesus dude, you are way over thinking what I wrote as well as projecting. I said nothing about video games nor was I making a political statement.

I don't know how old you are but when I was younger we didn't have school shooting drills at school. Not did we have media coverage like we do today. Again, just facts nothing political. Do your liberal thing but don't try and call me out with your projecting/

I did not claim you made a point about video games.

If you are 45 then I am a year older than you and our generation had juvenile crime rates that surpass todays. There were many school shootings.
 
Back
Top