Still have the guns you're not man enough to take, boy.
2nd Amendment right to carry openly in public affirmed
- Thread starter SmarterthanYou
- Start date
Still have the guns you're not man enough to take, boy.
Except that the actual wordage was "keep and bear". "keep" took it out of the strictly military context.
Not even that. Any jurist would laugh at your ignorance.
Before I could get my CCP, I used to walk through town to the dump to shoot rats. I used a S&W K-.38. The cop would drive past me and wave.
I believe the days when a 16 yr. old can walk down the street with any firearm are history.
But to address your quote, at this point, I would agree. Concealed carry (loaded) is the only way to go anymore.
MAGA MAN
Let's go Brandon!
Oh really? Which esteemed jurist doesn't think that a person has the right to life?
MAGA MAN
Let's go Brandon!
Correct. Domer once again destroyed.
Yes. If, like us, liberals aren't out shooting up the streets, why does it matter? It's your right, isn't it?
Only a Liberal is fool enough to believe passing a law that criminals won't follow will stop shootings.
Guno צְבִי
We fight, We win, Am Yisrael Chai
43%er.
“Where does it say in the Constitution....?”
How To Handle The Common Teabagger
http://terribleminds.com/ramble/2010/03/21/how-to-handle-the-common-teabagger/
When I teabag your wife, she's unable to speak.
MSgt
A Leader of Airmen
Liberals are largely responsible for writing the 2nd Amendment. It's leftists that want to get rid of it.
MSgt
A Leader of Airmen
Only the hypocritical ones.
I assume that means we cannot prohibit the mentally ill, violent felons, or children from purchasing weapons?
Does that also mean the constitutional provision that Congress shall make "no law" restricting free speech or press mean we cannot regulate libel, slander, pornography, child pornography, threats, obscenity..?
If I allow you to own one shotgun, for example, have I infringed on your right to "keep and bear arms" since you have a weapon? This is not something I am proposing, just trying to clarity your constitutional interpretation.
MSgt
A Leader of Airmen
Regarding the First Amendment, it was assumed that such restrictions would be handled by state and municipal governments. Especially given that the Barron decision ruled that the Bill of Rights didn't apply to the states. The Constitution did grant the federal government the power to protect patents and copyrights due to their role in commerce.
As to the Second, people incapable of taking responsibility for their actions (like minors and the mentally ill) probably don't comprise the common militia. Depending upon age and functionality, one might grant a firearm for limited purposes that lacks the amendment's absolute protection.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
you are lying, that is not what I said. come back with EXACTLY what I said, fuckstik liar.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
that is not correct. an openly carried handgun in PA can be loaded.
“Bear” kept it in. Your can’t “bear” arms unless you “keep” them. It doesn’t say keep OR bear arms, dies it? Can’t seaparate them.
Next.
Heller
lol
It’s so easy to allow you morons to paint yourself into a corner from which you can’t extricate yourself. That’s slow drying paint, cretin.