^Article is 2 days old. the sunset has been settled.
16year term with a review in 6 years, and then it can be extended for another 16 years.
Or it can just go to the 16 years term and be renewed/cancelled.
This is a much better way then what Trump wanted.
His 5 year review was a bad idea -too much uncertainty for business to commit to long term deals when the framework
this thread is an example of TDS run rampant.
You guys will twist and distort and deny...ANYTHING other then to say these negotiations are very likely to succeed.
And now on to the Chinese trade talks! ( difficult as well, but forbearance and determination do pay off)
completely different.What was achieved is an understanding on some parts of the negotiations, not an agreement.
This is much like Trump's ground-breaking NK agreement .. that wasn't.
Sure ..
North Korea has increased nuclear production at secret sites, say U.S. officials
"Work is ongoing to deceive us on the number of facilities, the number of weapons, the number of missiles," said one U.S. official.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/north-...nuclear-production-secret-sites-say-u-n887926
Sure ..
North Korea has increased nuclear production at secret sites, say U.S. officials
"Work is ongoing to deceive us on the number of facilities, the number of weapons, the number of missiles," said one U.S. official.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/north-...nuclear-production-secret-sites-say-u-n887926
you should follow before you post. This is a significant rework > i gave a few reasons why.
Further this doesn't depend on the whim of NK. Trump/Lighthizer control their own outcomes
actually I was the one cautioning against over-reacting to instant success- I frequently mentioned kim may be using a stall - that exact word many times.You were also popping the champagne corks before the Singapore summit, so I am afraid I do not consider you a reliable source of information on the alleged success of Trump's efforts in geopolitical negotiations. My judgement on North Korea turned out to be closer to reality than yours.
I have seen reputable journalists say this is not a significant re-working of NAFTA, and pretty much fails on all of Trump's campaign promises.
actually I was the one cautioning against over-reacting to instant success- I frequently mentioned kim may be using a stall - that exact word many times.
However kim is being 'led astray' by Chinese cheating - of course his military is more instituional
and resists as well.the blame falls squarely on China for much
how does this fail? "journalists" are also invested in damning Trump's efforts.
everything I've mentioned in these last few posts look good to me
content/wages/agriculture all look like improvements
"In many respects, Monday’s announcement is like Trump’s summit with North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un. Both came amid much fanfare and bluster — and premature declarations of success."
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opin...afta-bad-trade-editorials-debates/1114349002/
Canada trade minister cancelled a trip to the EU and is flying in to DC.Given how quick you were to spike the football in the end zone before the Singapore summit, it strains credulity to even begin to think you have good judgement on Trump's negotiating skills.
When compared to your track record of predictions, I find this analysis to seem more plausible.
The fact Mexican workers wages went up means that Mexican cheap labor is no longer available.
the idea is to rise Mexican wages so that cheap labor doesn't suck out our jobs.Wrong. Mexico is getting its wages up to $16/hr, which is where UAW wages start. So they're still cheaper labor than American labor. So what does that accomplish for us? Nothing. Sure, it may raise the wages of a few thousand Mexican auto workers...but those workers will eventually be replaced by robots who you can pay $0/hr and not worry about their working conditions. Raising Mexican wages for auto workers to $16/hr won't bring those jobs back to the US, where UAW workers start at $16/hr and the average is around $23-28/hr.
Is $16/hr > or < $23/hr?
Higher wages for Mexico is good -do I need to list the reasons why? no more offshoring auto manufacturing jobs to Mexico for cheap labor.
also there are a lot of US car makers that are not UAW/union
the idea is to rise Mexican wages so that cheap labor doesn't suck out our jobs
It's also intrinsict good for Mexico,and the better their economy,the less they will illegally "migrate" here
there are many non-UAW autoplants in the US
Just more MAGA! Great win for the country Mr. PResident.
You are an idiot