Federal deficit grows by 32% to $900B
- Thread starter LV426
- Start date
This is why you never argue with idiots. 
Getin the ring
Verified User
the mortgage crisis caused by Democrats?
funny how you make our argument for us sometime
yea, that's the one
No they don't you brain dead moron.
Another moronic claim from an idiot on steroids. You liars have no shame. You keep repeating the same lies over and over again pretending that repeating them makes them look less ignorant. STFU, seriously.
You make the uninformed assumption that someone who is concerned about wasteful government spending and huge deficits must be a conservative. Many of the Democrats posting on this forum are now concerned about deficits and debt.
With such huge increases in SNAP spending since 2009 cuts in benefits is one way to keep that deficit and debt down Democrats now worry about. News today reported a record number of people quitting their jobs to take higher paying ones---makes those food stamps less necessary.
SNAP is primarily welfare for the rich with most of the money going to big ag, truckers, food processing plants, grocery stores, convenience stores, and now fast food places. The FBI reports food stamp fraud is one of the easiest crimes to commit.
We need a central banking system because of the size of our economy, and the risk banks take. Also, we need the central bank to fight inflation by raising interest rates when appropriate. Only a central bank can do that.
Yes.
And it's not just me, but rather reputable economists that cite that tax cut as the cause of volatility in the market at the end of the 90's.
Here's Why The Dot Com Bubble Began And Why It Popped
I hate tax cuts because they're a cynical way for Conservatives with bad intentions and bad faith to attack the spending to which they're ideologically opposed, but lack the courage, will, and support to repeal through conventional legislation. So you all commit fiscal terrorism by flying planes of tax cuts into the budget to manufacture a deficit crisis, and then use that crisis you created as the excuse to exact punitive cuts against people you sanctimoniously judge.
That's fuckin' terrorism, pal.
And you hid the fact that SNAP spending has increased from $17 billion to $68 billion since 2000. With unemployment at 3.9% why hasn't that spending fallen back to pre-recession levels?
SNAP is an entitlement program with spending generated by number of people eligible for benefits.
Your anger is obviously responsible for looking for people to insult and attack. You are as bad as the Trump supporters in your hatred.
If you want less SNAP, raise wages.
SNAP is determined by income. The higher your income, the less in benefits you qualify. So if SNAP spending is truly your concern, you should be arguing for higher wages starting with an increase in the minimum wage to at least $15/hr.
But you oppose raising the minimum wage, don't you?
So explain to me how your trolling over SNAP isn't just masturbation.
I sure hope not. I don't share your anger and hatred, your need to attack those you disagree with, your hypocrisy in acting like you care about individuals while insulting and denigrating them, and your simplistic assumption that a person is a conservative because they want to be fiscally responsible, and your inability to engage in civil debate.
I didn't hide that at all. In fact, I responded to it directly. YOU DIDN'T RESPOND TO WHAT I WROTE.
All you do is lie. I think you don't even know what it is to tell the truth anymore. You seem to just say whatever the fuck you want, whenever you want, and don't care if it's truthful. You're just a troll, and a pretty shitty one at that.
Because SNAP eligibility and benefits are determined by income, and you assholes refuse to raise the minimum wage to at least $15/hr. Doing so would move millions off SNAP, and/or reduce the amount of SNAP for which they can qualify.
So you screech about SNAP, leave out the fact that while more people are on SNAP their benefits are lower, and then refuse to raise the minimum wage to a level that would reduce SNAP eligibility.
So you're just masturbating here. You're perpetuating a problem that you are concurrently complaining about.
What a fucking fraud.
cawacko
Well-known member
Does needing a federal banking system mean it's above reproach and can't do wrong? Because that's what it sounds like you're saying here
Right, and what determined eligibility? Income. So the more you make, the less in benefits you qualify. So if you raised the minimum wage to $15/hr, that would significantly reduce the amount of SNAP benefits for which those workers qualify.
But you oppose raising the minimum wage, and it seems you do for the sole purpose of perpetuating a problem in order to sanctimoniously complain about it. But it's only a problem because you made it so with your support of poor economic and wage policy.
So change your thinking. Change your position. Change your beliefs to reflect the facts and reality. Don't complain about a problem and then oppose the only solution. That's just masturbation. So are you a jerk-off? You very well might be.
I'm not concerned (or trolling) over SNAP. I just responded to your post which inaccurately claimed SNAP spending had been cut. Then you changed it to individual benefits rather than total spending and blamed me for "hiding" something because I checked the federal budget for total SNAP spending. I read your article about individual benefit cuts and now understand what you were talking about. It does not make my statement about large increases in SNAP spending untrue.
Throughout Obama, and after him, Conservatives screeched tirelessly about the debt and deficit. Then, when given control what do you people do? Increase the debt and deficit. Pointing that out doesn't mean you and I both feel the same way about the debt. Pointing it out only shows how disingenuous your debt position actually is.