Why does it have to be the FBI?

Or, conversely, she might just not want to testify in public.

I still think it's hilarious that you guys think all of this is a negative w/ potential backlash for Dems. I'm not sure if you can see how this looks to a good solid half of the voting public.

There might be a good reason for that.

When Dr. Ford first indicated that she told NOBODY about the incident...I was taken aback.

My feelings were that she must have told several of her close friends. It is not the kind of thing a young female teenager would keep totally hidden from friends.

I am now thinking that she does not want to put these other parties on the chopping block for the disgusting American right-wing to denigrate and politically abuse.

Under oath, she might have to acknowledge that she did mention the incident contemporaneously to others...and then would have to demure when asked for names.

These Republican assholes are pros at turning victims and their defenders...into demons.
 
why do the republicans want to DO SPECIAL THINGS this time around instead of having the professionals investigate the issue
 
WOW, what a great point you are making. I guess you are as uninformed as your other left wing friends on here.

Here are the options being afforded to Christine BALLSY Ford

1) She can testify in public
2) She can testify in private
3) Grassley has offered to fly the Senate Judicial Committee to her in order to meet with her
4) Grassley offered to have a phone call with Ford with Feinstein on the call as well

Four options have been afforded to this woman and she has denied them all

As to the politics of this. I can guarantee this. If she declines to come forward and Kavanaugh is confirmed AND the democrats have a hissy fit and pull some crazy shit like have her do an interview on 60 minutes a week before the election, the democrats will get fucking crushed in the mid terms.

You guys always walk around with these faulty assumptions because you live in a fucking bubble. You can't for one second wrap your brain around the fact that people think differently than you. You live in this binary world where one either believes Ford or they support rape.

Let me break this down for you. No serious person in this country supports rape or sexual assault. Anyone who claims that that is true is not to be taken seriously. But, Americans as a whole are fundamentally fair. While they can agree that these are serious charges, it is only natural that they will question the following

1) Why did she wait until now to come forward?
2) Why if she didn't want to come forward did she voluntarily go to the Washington Post and a democrat lawmaker? What was her goal in going to them if she wanted to be anonymous?
3) Why did her lawyer say she would testify and then retract it?


You are living in this fantasy land of METOO where ALL women vote with their vaginas and are just going to believe this woman no matter what.

Need I remind you of the 2016 election? How many broads did your side trot out trying to take down Trump? Women who accused him of assault, Meees Peeegy, and of course the infamous Access Hollywood tape. Every single one of these were supposed to cause Trump to tank with women. Women were going to flock to Clinton and crush Trump. IT DIDN'T FUCKING HAPPEN.

So history is on my side. Not yours. All you have are your faulty assumptions.

Let's see how it goes. Less then 2 months away now.

Can't wait.
 
There might be a good reason for that.

When Dr. Ford first indicated that she told NOBODY about the incident...I was taken aback.

My feelings were that she must have told several of her close friends. It is not the kind of thing a young female teenager would keep totally hidden from friends.

I am now thinking that she does not want to put these other parties on the chopping block for the disgusting American right-wing to denigrate and politically abuse.

Under oath, she might have to acknowledge that she did mention the incident contemporaneously to others...and then would have to demure when asked for names.

These Republican assholes are pros at turning victims and their defenders...into demons.



It is perfectly NORMAL for an attack victim to tell NO ONE


the social stigma of an attack for women ( especially back then) is they might be BLAMED for the attack


remember all the shit about "well she should not be at a party with boys ,why was she wwearing a bathing suit"


the same idiot shit as "black men should not wear hoodies if they don't want to be mistaken for criminals"


the blame the victim shit idiots do
 
of course they could, what the fuck are you trying to say?

It isn't clear what I am trying to say?

I am saying that all she has to do is file a complaint with the local police department in the town of the alleged crime they would investigate. She could have an investigation started TODAY. It doesn't HAVE to be the FBI. What is the FBI going to be able to do that the local police can't?

Also, I don't think she really wants an FBI investigation. I mean wouldn't they want to investigate her motive and ask for all of her electronic communications from July 2018 forward? I would love to see them :)
 
WOW way to put yourself out there Chief

What's the point? I'm not going go convince you of how insensitive and misogynistic Fox, talk radio & many on the right are coming across as right now. It's worse than it was w/ Hill.

I think it's a base-motivator, personally. But Grind gets upset when I make predictions, so...
 
Or, conversely, she might just not want to testify in public.

I still think it's hilarious that you guys think all of this is a negative w/ potential backlash for Dems. I'm not sure if you can see how this looks to a good solid half of the voting public.

i don't think that at all. I think democrats are playing stupid people (like yourself) like a fiddle. Optics wise democrats have done a good job. They are just liars.
 
I am now thinking that she does not want to put these other parties on the chopping block for the disgusting American right-wing to denigrate and politically abuse.

so if she told people that would help prove her case. Yet her denying that she told anyone, also proves her case.

so what you are really saying is nothing short of fluff to back up your biases.
 
no it's not clear at all ho bag

do local police conduct thorough background checks?

what the fuck is wrong with you?

The only thing the FBI could do would be a 7th background check on Kav.
FBI background checks only go back as far as a person's age of 18 which is meaningless in this case.
Teenage pool party misconduct would be handles by local authorities.
End of story.
 
What's the point? I'm not going go convince you of how insensitive and misogynistic Fox, talk radio & many on the right are coming across as right now. It's worse than it was w/ Hill.

I think it's a base-motivator, personally. But Grind gets upset when I make predictions, so...

Please tell me about the insensitive and mysogynistic behavior you are seeing right now. Because, I have to be honest with you I haven't seen any of it. Now if your standard is that by even questioning her is sexist then yeah. But, I haven't seen any politician say anything negative about her. On the contrary she has been treated with kid gloves.

Don't think for a minute that part of the calculation as Ford plotted with her lawyer and democrats was that as soon as this came out Trump would go on a twitter rampage and they would be able to focus on his tweets and try to pressure the Flake types. But Trump has been the man.

You can't just make these statements without backing them up. Well, you can. I can't stop you. But you can't expect me to take you seriously
 
i don't think that at all. I think democrats are playing stupid people (like yourself) like a fiddle. Optics wise democrats have done a good job. They are just liars.

They haven't played me at all. Both sides do the same thing. I've been on record here saying that Kav will likely be confirmed, and frankly, unless something more compelling comes out on this, I think he should be. If Kav doesn't get confirmed, chances are someone as or more conservative will be ultimately. This isn't really a battle they should waste time on.

Outside of simply letting the process of this accusation play out. I'm not saying that if he's guilty, he should slide through. But there isn't enough there right now, without corroborating witnesses or other evidence, to create more than a he said/she said.
 
Back
Top