If no man is above the law, why do we have SANCTUARY CITIES?

It is surprising conservatives are advocating stronger federal power at the expense of states' rights by claiming the federal government can force the states to enforce immigration law.

The federal law requiring a background check to buy firearms originally required local sheriff's departments to perform these checks. Conservatives denounced this as excessive federal power over the states. The Supreme Court ruled this provision unconstitutional and this decision was hailed by conservatives.

The supremacy clause applies to the Constitution and federal laws for which the federal government has the authority. They have no authority to require states to enforce federal legislation (whether background checks or immigration law). Even most sanctuary cities are willing to hold immigration suspects wanted by federal authorities in local jails if they have a warrant to do so.

There are programs providing providing federal-state cooperation in immigration law if local authorities choose to participate.

Claiming local authorities are "encouraging" illegal immigrants to live in the U. S. is a huge, unrealistic stretch. The law applies to individuals, not government agencies. It also is an unconstitutional violation of free speech and was struck down as unconstitutional on December 4.
 
It is surprising conservatives are advocating stronger federal power at the expense of states' rights by claiming the federal government can force the states to enforce immigration law.

The federal law requiring a background check to buy firearms originally required local sheriff's departments to perform these checks. Conservatives denounced this as excessive federal power over the states. The Supreme Court ruled this provision unconstitutional and this decision was hailed by conservatives.

The supremacy clause applies to the Constitution and federal laws for which the federal government has the authority. They have no authority to require states to enforce federal legislation (whether background checks or immigration law). Even most sanctuary cities are willing to hold immigration suspects wanted by federal authorities in local jails if they have a warrant to do so.

There are programs providing providing federal-state cooperation in immigration law if local authorities choose to participate.

Claiming local authorities are "encouraging" illegal immigrants to live in the U. S. is a huge, unrealistic stretch. The law applies to individuals, not government agencies. It also is an unconstitutional violation of free speech and was struck down as unconstitutional on December 4.


Hopefully, one of the illegals you support being here will Kate Steinle or Mollie Tibbetts your family member.

When local authorities support people breaking the law, they encourage it to happen.
 
Hopefully, one of the illegals you support being here will Kate Steinle or Mollie Tibbetts your family member.

When local authorities support people breaking the law, they encourage it to happen.

You obviously cannot differentiate between describing current law and "supporting" illegal immigrants.

The guy that killed Kate was deported five times. So, "enforcing the law" in his case--arrest and deportation---obviously did not work permanently. He was convicted for being a felon in possession of a weapon.

How would it have been any different in his case if local authorities had been required to enforce immigration law? And, you obviously have no respect for the Constitution to want to give the federal government the power to force the states to enforce federal law.

And, just as you claim there are no words in the Constitution about "food stamps" or other welfare functions, there are no words in the Constitution about immigration.
 
This is a serious thread. I'll thank you to take your "jokes" elsewhere.

Hey thanks for the thread!

The idea of Sanctuary Cities is a misnomer anyway.

What we have are Police Departments and counties that have their job in dealing with real crimes and locking up real criminals.

And then we have ICE and the Border Patrol that deals with those who violate our Federal immigration laws that are only misdemeanors.

No one is protecting immigrants that violate our immigration laws, therefore there are no Sanctuaries!
 
Nope, they sure as shit are not, dumbfuck. But, you’re too fucking stupid to understand the concept.

DACA was a brazen violation of federal law. Obama gave millions of illegals a card saying they can live and work here even though the law says they can't!!! That is obstruction of justice and a 1324 felony violation. Same with the officials in sanctuary cities. THINK, white-hating racist.
 
DACA was a brazen violation of federal law. Obama gave millions of illegals a card saying they can live and work here even though the law says they can't!!! That is obstruction of justice and a 1324 felony violation. Same with the officials in sanctuary cities. THINK, white-hating racist.

THINK. ^:lolup::rofl2:

Coming from you, the greatest oxymoronic phrase on the forum.
 
You obviously cannot differentiate between describing current law and "supporting" illegal immigrants.

The guy that killed Kate was deported five times. So, "enforcing the law" in his case--arrest and deportation---obviously did not work permanently. He was convicted for being a felon in possession of a weapon.

How would it have been any different in his case if local authorities had been required to enforce immigration law? And, you obviously have no respect for the Constitution to want to give the federal government the power to force the states to enforce federal law.

And, just as you claim there are no words in the Constitution about "food stamps" or other welfare functions, there are no words in the Constitution about immigration.

Had the locals not enabled him to stay by providing a safe haven, he wouldn't have been here to do what he did. His possession of a weapon is why an INNOCENT citizen was killed.

I have no respect for a local jurisdiction giving a criminal a place to hide. Hopefully, your local jurisdiction will do the same thing and one of those illegals for which you make an excuse will Kate Steinle your family member. Maybe many of them.
 
Hey thanks for the thread!

The idea of Sanctuary Cities is a misnomer anyway.

What we have are Police Departments and counties that have their job in dealing with real crimes and locking up real criminals.

And then we have ICE and the Border Patrol that deals with those who violate our Federal immigration laws that are only misdemeanors.

No one is protecting immigrants that violate our immigration laws, therefore there are no Sanctuaries!

Hopefully one of those you consider not being given sanctuary will Kate Steinle your family memberS. Since you don't consider it a real crime, no one considers those family members real people.
 
Look Gay elf. I know you are upset with life because you got the "short" end of it. That makes you an angry "little" he/she/it, whatever the fuck you are. When you can prove to me that radiant heat causes air to heat directly, come on back. You would be the first person ever to prove that. Obviously you cannot ,being an elementary school drop out. Other than that you feeble, typical limpwristed attempt at trying to say that the supremacy clause does not apply to immigration is, well, so Gomer. Wrong.

Radiant heating is a technology for heating indoor and outdoor areas. Heating by radiant energy is observed every day, the warmth of the sunshine being the most commonly observed example.

Radiant heating - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiant_heating
 
Had the locals not enabled him to stay by providing a safe haven, he wouldn't have been here to do what he did. His possession of a weapon is why an INNOCENT citizen was killed.

I have no respect for a local jurisdiction giving a criminal a place to hide. Hopefully, your local jurisdiction will do the same thing and one of those illegals for which you make an excuse will Kate Steinle your family member. Maybe many of them.

They did not allow him to stay--he was deported five times.

Where does the Constitution give the government the power to control immigration? The same place that allowed food stamps or social welfare programs? You seem to oppose some governmental powers not delegated by the Constitution but approve of others similarly not delegated.

Sanctuary cities cannot prevent federal agencies from arresting and deporting illegals.
 
They did not allow him to stay--he was deported five times.

Where does the Constitution give the government the power to control immigration? The same place that allowed food stamps or social welfare programs? You seem to oppose some governmental powers not delegated by the Constitution but approve of others similarly not delegated.

Sanctuary cities cannot prevent federal agencies from arresting and deporting illegals.

They, the locals, can't deport him. They don't have the authority. When you start out with a lie, anything else you say is meaningless.

Hopefully, one of the illegals for which you make excuses will Kate Steinle your family member.
 
From you own link. You stupid fuck. Seriously, kill yourself. "Most of the radiation coming from the Sun passes right through the atmosphere, because the wavelength of visible light is not absorbed by the atmosphere."

:lolup::rofl2:

Sad little illiterate fucktard. Your claim was that there is ZERO heating of the atmosphere from the sun. I think your ignorant words were “never was, never will be”.

Note the word “most”, fool. Radiant energy in the infrared range is absorbed in the atmosphere and heats it. You conveniently left out the next sentence after your quote, liar. “Only the long wavelength infrared portion of sunlight is absorbed, and this heats the air.”

Once again, you demonstrate your ignorance with your own post. I don’t even need to provide any assistance. You do it all on your own!

Hoisted with your own petard, spudpeeler.
 
Last edited:
:lolup::rofl2:

Sad little illiterate fucktard. Your claim was that there is ZERO[/] heating of the atmosphere from the sun. I think your ignorant words were “never was, never will be”.

Note the word “most”, fool. Radiant energy in the infrared range is absorbed in the atmosphere and converted to heat.

Once again, you demonstrate your ignorance with your own post. I don’t even need to provide any assustance. You do it all on your own!


By that meltdown, the buttfucking you just got with your own stupidity and link must have really hurt. That is surprising to me midget as you take it up that ass a lot. It ok Gomer, you are flat out wrong. Your own link even showed it.
Please do not crap the board with your mental midget meltdown. Anyone can read your link.
 
By that meltdown, the buttfucking you just got with your own stupidity and link must have really hurt. That is surprising to me midget as you take it up that ass a lot. It ok Gomer, you are flat out wrong. Your own link even showed it.
Please do not crap the board with your mental midget meltdown. Anyone can read your link.

Hoisted with your own petard, liar. The next sentence after your quote, which you conveniently left out:

”Only the long wavelength infrared portion of sunlight is absorbed, and this heats the air.”

Now, tell us again how there is ZERO heating. :rofl2:

Keep posting illiterate shitstain. I love watching you humiliate yourself!
 
Back
Top