I think it’s more a matter of ‘what’ needs redemption at this point.
Specifically, the origin of the Russian investigation. Finally, it will get a serious look by someone who has the authority to convene grand juries and/or hand out indictments. Congress is too partisan to do it effectively.
It certainly appears as if the Comey firing ‘was a little too convenient’ a means of gassing-up a Russian Collusion investigation that was on life support at the time Comey provoked[?] Trump into firing him. Lisa Page testified to Congress that ‘they still didn’t know if there was anything to it’ at the time Mullet was appointed and Comey himself, publicly admitted[?!] to leaking in order to get an SC appointed.
That fact pattern is suggestive of a criminal conspiracy and needs looked into.
Here’s where they went wrong: the Russian investigation should have been allowed to proceed without an SC since it WAS a counterintelligence investigation at the time. If they wanted to appoint an SC to look at obstruction *the first thing* that should have happened was that Rosenstein should have recused.
And then appoint someone else to oversee the SC *and limit* the investigation to obstruction. Had they done that, the Russian counterintelligence investigation would have proceeded unmolested and Trump would have been cleared or convicted of obstruction by now.
But they started an open-ended crime search on Trump instead—which appears to be exactly what they wanted to happen.
Democrats, anti-Trump Rhinos and Deep Staters should prepare themselves for a very ugly outcome over this.
Because it is entirely conceivable it’s going to happen.