Rosenstein Breaks Silence on Barr’s Handling of Mueller Repor~Criticiism bizarre

Hello Darth,

He’s on record saying he would wear a wire around a president.

I think it would have been a good idea, given President Trump's history of flouting the law, and all the suspicious circumstantial evidence suggesting he is using the office for personal gain.

Rosenstein is lucky he wasn’t fired on the spot for that—or worse.

President Trump is lucky he didn't do that. If you think firing Comey was grounds for obstruction, firing Rosenstein would have sealed the deal.
 
Hello Darth,



I think it would have been a good idea, given President Trump's history of flouting the law, and all the suspicious circumstantial evidence suggesting he is using the office for personal gain.
of course you think that was a good idea -i'm sure you are all in on the IC spying on POTUS as well
 
Hello Darth,

Hopefully, Barr is serious about examining the ‘sufficiency of the evidence’ for the origin of the Russian investigation *and especially* the appointment of an SC.

If he is serious, I’d give it a 90% probability that serious chips will begin to fall.

Firing Comey for refusing to violate the Constitution was enough.

And this has been a pattern with Trump. We've seen it in the most recent firings. It's like there is a line of people appointed to these positions, and one by one the President asks them if they will violate the laws for him. When they say: "No," Trump fires them and moves on down the line, looking for somebody who is willing to break the law for him. The cabinet is in disarray. We don't have a functioning executive branch. What we have is totally a dysfunctional executive branch making a mess of everything. It's hurting the country. The sooner Trump is gone the better. I look forward to being rid of him.
 
I think it’s more a matter of ‘what’ needs redemption at this point.

Specifically, the origin of the Russian investigation. Finally, it will get a serious look by someone who has the authority to convene grand juries and/or hand out indictments. Congress is too partisan to do it effectively.

It certainly appears as if the Comey firing ‘was a little too convenient’ a means of gassing-up a Russian Collusion investigation that was on life support at the time Comey provoked[?] Trump into firing him. Lisa Page testified to Congress that ‘they still didn’t know if there was anything to it’ at the time Mullet was appointed and Comey himself, publicly admitted[?!] to leaking in order to get an SC appointed.

That fact pattern is suggestive of a criminal conspiracy and needs looked into.

Here’s where they went wrong: the Russian investigation should have been allowed to proceed without an SC since it WAS a counterintelligence investigation at the time. If they wanted to appoint an SC to look at obstruction *the first thing* that should have happened was that Rosenstein should have recused.

And then appoint someone else to oversee the SC *and limit* the investigation to obstruction. Had they done that, the Russian counterintelligence investigation would have proceeded unmolested and Trump would have been cleared or convicted of obstruction by now.

But they started an open-ended crime search on Trump instead—which appears to be exactly what they wanted to happen.

Democrats, anti-Trump Rhinos and Deep Staters should prepare themselves for a very ugly outcome over this.

Because it is entirely conceivable it’s going to happen.

trump never should have stated publicly that he fired Comey to end the Russia problem, and then backtrack and say it was because Comey was a bad boy whose coworkers hated him.
 
Hello Darth,



I think it would have been a good idea, given President Trump's history of flouting the law, and all the suspicious circumstantial evidence suggesting he is using the office for personal gain.



President Trump is lucky he didn't do that. If you think firing Comey was grounds for obstruction, firing Rosenstein would have sealed the deal.

Which laws did he flout. Cite them.

No collusion, no proof of obstruction. No more indictments, Snowflake.

"Using his office for personal gain." He doesn't take his salary and his net worth has decreased since he took office. You are a liar, Snowflake.
 
Hello Darth,



Firing Comey for refusing to violate the Constitution was enough.

And this has been a pattern with Trump. We've seen it in the most recent firings. It's like there is a line of people appointed to these positions, and one by one the President asks them if they will violate the laws for him. When they say: "No," Trump fires them and moves on down the line, looking for somebody who is willing to break the law for him. The cabinet is in disarray. We don't have a functioning executive branch. What we have is totally a dysfunctional executive branch making a mess of everything. It's hurting the country. The sooner Trump is gone the better. I look forward to being rid of him.
No, Snowflake, "President Donald Trump followed the recommendation of his deputy attorney general when he fired FBI boss James Comey."

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-3986676
 
Which laws did he flout. Cite them.

No collusion, no proof of obstruction. No more indictments, Snowflake.

"Using his office for personal gain." He doesn't take his salary and his net worth has decreased since he took office. You are a liar, Snowflake.

"Though Donald Trump’s net worth has decreased since he took the oath of office, Axios notes that Trump has managed to profit from his presidency. The publication reported mid-2018 that “Republican political campaigns and U.S. government agencies have spent more than $16 million on Trump properties for events, lodging, meals, rounds of golf and more since Donald Trump launched his presidential campaign in 2015.”

https://www.cheatsheet.com/money-career/donald-trump-net-worth.html/
 
Hello CosmicRocker,

so now exercising POTUS plenary power to fire Comey is obstruction? is that your bottom line?
where was the intent to obstruct if there was no crime of "collusion" ( conspiracy etc.)

Maybe the crime he was obstructing has not come to light, yet. Maybe Trump didn't want any investigations because he has questionable financial dealings with fraud or tax evasion. He has a history of that and has not been forthcoming in his tremendous and often questionable financial dealings. Has he really paid all his taxes?
 
Hello CosmicRocker,



Maybe the crime he was obstructing has not come to light, yet. Maybe Trump didn't want any investigations because he has questionable financial dealings with fraud or tax evasion. He has a history of that and has not been forthcoming in his tremendous and often questionable financial dealings. Has he really paid all his taxes?

Maybe you are an idiot, Snowflake.
 
Security costs for all presidents are a part of this country's commitment to protecting our presidents. ALL presidents incur security cost...especially Obama.
 
Hello CosmicRocker,

of course you think that was a good idea -i'm sure you are all in on the IC spying on POTUS as well

The President is not above the law. We have to have ways of checking up on him - checks and balances. No office can have absolute power.
 
Did you miss trump going on TV and saying he fired Comey because of "this Russia thing"?

That's not what he said.

:dunno:

Did you miss the Rosenstein letter recommending Comey's firing for interfering in Hillary's campaign? Didn't the Left want Comey fired for that reason? Did Comey's firing "stop the Russia thing" as you claim it was intended to do?
 
That's not what he said.

:dunno:

Did you miss the Rosenstein letter recommending Comey's firing for interfering in Hillary's campaign? Didn't the Left want Comey fired for that reason? Did Comey's firing "stop the Russia thing" as you claim it was intended to do?

Are you going to claim it didn't happen because the word order is different?

"Donald Trump has said he was thinking of “this Russia thing” when he decided James Comey’s fate – contradicting the White House rationale that he fired the FBI director for mishandling the Clinton email investigation.

Comey had been leading an investigation into possible collusion between Trump advisers and Russian officials when he was dismissed by the president. Defending that decision in an interview on NBC News on Thursday, Trump said: “And, in fact, when I decided to just do it, I said to myself, I said: ‘You know, this Russia thing with Trump and Russia is a made up story, it’s an excuse by the Democrats for having lost an election that they should’ve won.’”


Rosenstein didn't make that decision, trump did, then he had Rosenstein write the letter of dismissal.

"But Rosenstein confirmed to lawmakers that he learned of Trump's decision to fire Comey one day before writing the memo outlining his perceived misconduct. He emphasized that his memo was "not a legal brief" and "not a finding of official misconduct."
 
Hello CosmicRocker,



The President is not above the law. We have to have ways of checking up on him - checks and balances. No office can have absolute power.
sure. so let's hire an independent prosecutor with no evidence of an underlying crime
-after already being investigated for a year....
your sophistry is worse then your TDS
 
Maybe the crime he was obstructing has not come to light, yet. Maybe Trump didn't want any investigations because he has questionable financial dealings with fraud or tax evasion. He has a history of that and has not been forthcoming in his tremendous and often questionable financial dealings. Has he really paid all his taxes?
:palm:
 
Hello Darth,



I think it would have been a good idea, given President Trump's history of flouting the law, and all the suspicious circumstantial evidence suggesting he is using the office for personal gain.



President Trump is lucky he didn't do that. If you think firing Comey was grounds for obstruction, firing Rosenstein would have sealed the deal.

So, people surrounding Trump should be permitted to indulge in criminal acts, because, Trump lol?

That *perverse* attitude is precisely what got us into this mess. And again, please do yourself a favor and take an online civics course.
 
Back
Top