Dimwit Donny begins process of War with Iran.

Truth Detector said:
Here's all the Democrats that supported the war and or made the exact same claims as Bush. I know dishonest liberal morons like you pretend there is no history:

Saddam Hussein has spent the better part of this decade and much of his nation's wealth not on providing for the Iraqi people but on developing nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them."
-- President Bill Clinton (State of the Union Address), Jan. 27, 1998

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"No one has done what Saddam Hussein has done, or is thinking of doing. He is producing weapons of mass destruction, and he is qualitatively and quantitatively different from other dictators.""Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

"I mean, we have three different countries that, while they all present serious problems for the United States -- they're dictatorships, they're involved in the development and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction -- you know, the most imminent, clear and present threat to our country is not the same from those three countries. I think Iraq is the most serious and imminent threat to our country."
-- Sen. John Edwards (D, NC) Feb. 24, 2002

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power. We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." "
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein's regime is a serious danger, that he is a tyrant, and that his pursuit of lethal weapons of mass destruction cannot be tolerated. He must be disarmed. We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Edward Kennedy (D, MA) Sep. 27, 2002

"Now let me be clear -- I suffer no illusions about Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal man. A ruthless man. A man who butchers his own people to secure his own power. He has repeatedly defied UN resolutions, thwarted UN inspection teams, developed chemical and biological weapons, and coveted nuclear capacity. He's a bad guy. The world, and the Iraqi people, would be better off without him."
-- State Senator Barack Obama (Democrat, Illinois) Oct. 2, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"My position is very clear: The time has come for decisive action to eliminate the threat posed by Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction."
-- Senator John Edwards (D, NC), Oct. 7, 2002

"We stopped the fighting [in 1991] on an agreement that Iraq would take steps to assure the world that it would not engage in further aggression and that it would destroy its weapons of mass destruction. It has refused to take those steps. That refusal constitutes a breach of the armistice which renders it void and justifies resumption of the armed conflict."
-- Sen. Harry Reid (D. NV) Oct. 9, 2002


"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"I come to this debate, Mr. Speaker, as one at the end of 10 years in office on the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, where stopping the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction was one of my top priorities. I applaud the President on focusing on this issue and on taking the lead to disarm Saddam Hussein. ... Others have talked about this threat that is posed by Saddam Hussein. Yes, he has chemical weapons, he has biological weapons, he is trying to get nuclear weapons."
-- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D. CA) Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

"People can quarrel with whether we should have more troops in Afghanistan or internationalize Iraq or whatever, but it is incontestable that on the day I left office, there were unaccounted for stocks of biological and chemical weapons."
-- Ex President Bill Clinton, Jul. 22, 2003 (Interview with CNN Larry King)

I asked very direct questions of the top people in the CIA and people who'd served in the Clinton administration. And they said they believed that Saddam Hussein either had weapons or had the components of weapons or the ability to quickly make weapons of mass destruction. What we're worried about is an A-bomb in a Ryder truck in New York, in Washington and St. Louis. It cannot happen. We have to prevent it from happening.
-- Rep. Richard Gephardt (D, MT) Nov. 2, 2003
Click to expand...
Thanks, TD. Great post.
 
Controlled Opposition said:
The MSM LOVES war. They are owned by the same corporations who own the Military/Industrial/Congressinal Complex. They don't bite the hands that feed them.
Click to expand...

Good lord; loony Tune time!

giphy.gif
 
Jack said:
Trump is provoking a War with a Country we have no fight with.
Click to expand...

Way to CHEERLEAD THE TERRORISTS.

Are you really that ignorant of the facts?

Nearly 300 Marines, in a UN mission, butchered in Beirut....funded by Iran.

Thousands of US troops, and countless Iraqi civilians killed and maimed by bombs manufactured in Iran.

Hamas...funded by Iran.

The Houtis….funded by Iran.

Etc., etc. ad nauseum.


Iran is ALREADY AT WAR WITH AMERICA ,and HAS BEEN FOR DECADES.



Meanwhile, your darling, the Obamidiot, handed them $billions, and allowed their nuclear weapons program to go forward, full speed, with NO inspections of MILITARY INSTALLATIONS, the flaming IDIOT...as their leaders called for "DEAT TO AMERICA".


Iran’s supreme leader screams ‘Death to America’ amid ongoing nuclear talks


https://nypost.com/2015/03/23/irans...-death-to-america-amid-ongoing-nuclear-talks/



Get a clue, willya?




https://nypost.com/2015/03/23/irans...-death-to-america-amid-ongoing-nuclear-talks/
 
It isn't Trump that's leading the US into war with Iran- It's Netanyahu.
Geez, how dumb can you get.

Scoop: Israel passed White House intelligence on possible Iran plot

Israel passed information on an alleged Iranian plot to attack U.S. interests in the Gulf to the U.S. before national security adviser John Bolton threatened Iran with "unrelenting force" last night, senior Israeli officials told me.

Why it matters: Bolton's unusual and aggressive statement included news that the U.S. would move an aircraft carrier to the region. The officials said intelligence gathered by Israel, primarily by the Mossad intelligence agency, is understood to be part of the reason for Bolton's announcement.

https://www.axios.com/israel-warned...ton-34f25563-c3f3-41ee-a653-9d96b4541984.html
Click to expand...


Are you REALLY willing to sacrifice American lives for these bastards ?

 
Not our fight. How much Blood & Treasure do you want to give away to fight someone else's fight? (aren't we 'Energy Independent'?)


Grokmaster said:
Way to CHEERLEAD THE TERRORISTS.

Are you really that ignorant of the facts?

Nearly 300 Marines, in a UN mission, butchered in Beirut....funded by Iran.

Thousands of US troops, and countless Iraqi civilians killed and maimed by bombs manufactured in Iran.

Hamas...funded by Iran.

The Houtis….funded by Iran.

Etc., etc. ad nauseum.


Iran is ALREADY AT WAR WITH AMERICA ,and HAS BEEN FOR DECADES.



Meanwhile, your darling, the Obamidiot, handed them $billions, and allowed their nuclear weapons program to go forward, full speed, with NO inspections of MILITARY INSTALLATIONS, the flaming IDIOT...as their leaders called for "DEAT TO AMERICA".


Iran’s supreme leader screams ‘Death to America’ amid ongoing nuclear talks


https://nypost.com/2015/03/23/irans...-death-to-america-amid-ongoing-nuclear-talks/



Get a clue, willya?




https://nypost.com/2015/03/23/irans...-death-to-america-amid-ongoing-nuclear-talks/
Click to expand...
 
Jack said:
I'm on America's side.
Earl, how many of your children will you send to die for the Saudi Royal Family and Israel?
Click to expand...

Iran is the head of the teroorist snake time to chop it off, I won't send my kids, they will volunteer and so will I!
 
Jack said:
Not our fight. How much Blood & Treasure do you want to give away to fight someone else's fight? (aren't we 'Energy Independent'?)
Click to expand...

How many dead Americans from islamists funded by IRAN, and calls for "Death to America" are necessary to make it "our fight", in your view?


What is the "ACCEPTABLE NUMBER"?

As I said, Iran is ALREADY AT WAR WITH US....
 
War with Iran ? We owe Izrael NOTHING !


Iraq: A War For Israel

The U.S. bombing and invasion of Iraq in March-April 2003, and the occupation that followed, cost more than four thousand American lives and hundreds of billions of dollars, ( and over seventy THOUSAND permanently disabled vets ) and brought death to many tens of thousands of Iraqis.

https://www.ihr.org/leaflets/iraqwar.shtml

What role did Israel play in the run-up to the Iraq war?

https://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/mehdi-hasan/2010/02/iraq-war-israel-bush-saddam


IRAQ: War Launched to Protect Israel – Bush Adviser

http://www.ipsnews.net/2004/03/iraq-war-launched-to-protect-israel-bush-adviser/

A War for Israel

https://ifamericaknew.org/us_ints/warforisrael.html

Israel and the US War on Iraq

https://www.counterpunch.org/2003/02/26/israel-and-the-us-war-on-iraq/
Click to expand...
 
Who killed 3,000 in New York City? Iranians ... or Saudis?



Grokmaster said:
How many dead Americans from islamists funded by IRAN, and calls for "Death to America" are necessary to make it "our fight", in your view?


What is the "ACCEPTABLE NUMBER"?

As I said, Iran is ALREADY AT WAR WITH US....
Click to expand...
 
Washington (CNN)Secretary of State Mike Pompeo agreed with a suggestion posed in an interview Thursday that it's possible God raised Donald Trump to be President in order to protect Israel from Iran.

In an interview in Jerusalem, the Christian Broadcast Network's Chris Mitchell asked Pompeo, "could it be that President Trump right now has been sort of raised for such a time as this, just like Queen Esther, to help save the Jewish people from the Iranian menace?" Esther is the main heroine of the Jewish holiday of Purim, which was celebrated this week.
"As a Christian, I certainly believe that's possible," Pompeo said.
Pompeo added that he is "confident that the Lord is at work here" when he sees the "remarkable history of the faith in this place and the work that our administration's done to make sure that this democracy in the Middle East, that this Jewish state, remains."
 
Wolverine said:
Actually they provoke us all the time and intel says they are planning to attack us on several fronts. Why not be prepared
Click to expand...

We are at 'Economic War' with Iran. We are crushing their economy and destabilizing their country.

"The Trump Administration has made sanctions central to efforts to apply “maximum pressure” on Iran’s regime. On May 8,
2018, President Trump announced that the United States would no longer participate in the JCPOA and that all U.S.
secondary sanctions would be reimposed by early November 2018. The reinstatement of U.S. sanctions has driven Iran’s
economy into mild recession as major companies exit the Iranian economy rather than risk being penalized by the United
States. Iran’s oil exports have decreased significantly, the value of Iran’s currency has declined sharply, and unrest has
continued, although not to the point where the regime is threatened. But, the European Union and other countries are trying to
keep the economic benefits of the JCPOA flowing to Iran in order to persuade Iran to remain in the accord. To that end, in
January 2019 the European countries created a trading mechanism (Special Purpose Vehicle) that presumably can increase
trade with Iran by circumventing U.S. secondary sanctions. On November 5, 2018, the Administration granted 180-day
“Significant Reduction Exceptions” (SREs) to eight countries – enabling them to import Iranian oil without penalty as long as
they continue to reduce purchases of Iranian oil. On April 22, 2019. The Administration announced it would not renew any
SREs when they expire on May 2, 2019, instead seeking to drive Iran’s oil exports as close to zero as possible. The economic
difficulties have prompted Iranian hardliners to urge reconsideration of Iran’s continued adherence to the JCPOA."
https://fas.org/sgp/crs/mideast/RS20871.pdf
 
Jack said:
We are at 'Economic War' with Iran. We are crushing their economy and destabilizing their country.

"The Trump Administration has made sanctions central to efforts to apply “maximum pressure” on Iran’s regime. On May 8,
2018, President Trump announced that the United States would no longer participate in the JCPOA and that all U.S.
secondary sanctions would be reimposed by early November 2018. The reinstatement of U.S. sanctions has driven Iran’s
economy into mild recession as major companies exit the Iranian economy rather than risk being penalized by the United
States. Iran’s oil exports have decreased significantly, the value of Iran’s currency has declined sharply, and unrest has
continued, although not to the point where the regime is threatened. But, the European Union and other countries are trying to
keep the economic benefits of the JCPOA flowing to Iran in order to persuade Iran to remain in the accord. To that end, in
January 2019 the European countries created a trading mechanism (Special Purpose Vehicle) that presumably can increase
trade with Iran by circumventing U.S. secondary sanctions. On November 5, 2018, the Administration granted 180-day
“Significant Reduction Exceptions” (SREs) to eight countries – enabling them to import Iranian oil without penalty as long as
they continue to reduce purchases of Iranian oil. On April 22, 2019. The Administration announced it would not renew any
SREs when they expire on May 2, 2019, instead seeking to drive Iran’s oil exports as close to zero as possible. The economic
difficulties have prompted Iranian hardliners to urge reconsideration of Iran’s continued adherence to the JCPOA."
https://fas.org/sgp/crs/mideast/RS20871.pdf
Click to expand...

Is there a point?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top