Will political correctness kill classic movies?

The first bombing did not cause the Japanese to capitulate. The second did.

An estimated 100K American soldiers' lives in a land invasion of Japan were saved by these two bombs.

Actually, the war was all but won before the first bomb was dropped. Nazi Germany had already surrendered and Japan was barely standing. The atom bombs were totally unnecessary.
 
Actually, the war was all but won before the first bomb was dropped. Nazi Germany had already surrendered and Japan was barely standing. The atom bombs were totally unnecessary.

Depends upon how one views it, surely the Allies would have won a continuation of hostilities without the bomb, but Japan was not going to surrender, estimates at the time believed they could have held on for another nine months to a year, meaning more Allies would have been killed and probably the total destruction of nearly all of Japan by air bombardment
 
Depends upon how one views it, surely the Allies would have won a continuation of hostilities without the bomb, but Japan was not going to surrender, estimates at the time believed they could have held on for another nine months to a year, meaning more Allies would have been killed and probably the total destruction of nearly all of Japan by air bombardment

Thank you Archives.
 
Depends upon how one views it, surely the Allies would have won a continuation of hostilities without the bomb, but Japan was not going to surrender, estimates at the time believed they could have held on for another nine months to a year, meaning more Allies would have been killed and probably the total destruction of nearly all of Japan by air bombardment

Actually, Japan was planning on surrendering.

https://www.thenation.com/article/why-the-us-really-bombed-hiroshima/

The Japanese might not admit it today, but the Japanese of the time had already accepted the war was over. There was no way Japan was holding out much longer without the Germans against America, the British Empire, and the Soviet Union.
 
Dumb,PC, sensitive people. The world is full of them. How old are you?

That wasn't the question. The OP mentioned one movie criticizing patriarchy and another movie having a gay character.
So who is playing a bigger part in destroying cinema, the women or the gays?
 
That wasn't the question. The OP mentioned one movie criticizing patriarchy and another movie having a gay character.
So who is playing a bigger part in destroying cinema, the women or the gays?

Why? Do either of them bother you? How about you throw some color in there also, make it a real liberal Democrat agenda.
 
Why? Do either of them bother you? How about you throw some color in there also, make it a real liberal Democrat agenda.

No, I don't see anti-patriarchy messages or gay characters as being bad for movies. But apparently some edgy people here have decided this PC business is destroying movies.
 
No, I don't see anti-patriarchy messages or gay characters as being bad for movies. But apparently some edgy people here have decided this PC business is destroying movies.

PC is not only destroying movies, it is destroying society. We are all different. Was not that long ago people could point out those differences and laugh about them. People got along a lot better.
 
What exactly is wrong about any of this? Are you in favor of the patriarchy? Should movies not have gay characters? Was unnecessarily bombing Japan twice a good thing?

I don't want my entertainment media (especially comedies) to preach to me about their politics. If it is designed to be political satire then I am aware of its content.
 
Political correctness kills everything, frankly. I can't think of one industry that hasn't been reduced to mediocrity by the thought and speech policing of the politically correct.
 
PC is not only destroying movies, it is destroying society. We are all different. Was not that long ago people could point out those differences and laugh about them. People got along a lot better.

Every generation has PC culture. People being uptight over jokes is hardly anything new.
But the things the OP is complaining about don't seem to be all that bad. Maybe he's one of these Status Quo Warriors who gets triggered over veganism and trans people.
 
I don't want my entertainment media (especially comedies) to preach to me about their politics. If it is designed to be political satire then I am aware of its content.

Then your issue has nothing to do with the current age. Comedies have always touched upon politics and philosophy, often without advertising it.
 
LOL! John Wayne was racist to his core. A draft dodger, an alcoholic, a drug abuser and a wife beater, among other things.

Factually describing him as such isn't PC. It's reality. Something that whore like you fear.

So if someone factually describes MLK as a slow thinking Marxist that had drunken sex orgies and coerced young women to participate..while holding himself out to public view as a moral leader of religious conviction. U would be the first to scream racist
 
Last edited:
So if someone factually describe MLK as a POS that had drunken sex orgies and coerced young women to participate..while holding himself out to public view as a moral leader of religious conviction. U would be the first to scream racist

Meh. What I said about Wayne is confirmed fact, nigger. What you're describing has nothing to do with face, nigger.
 
Back
Top