Sharia Law or Alabama?
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
Dumber and Dumbest in a race to the bottom of the sewer. 
There is no "GOP war on women" you pathological lying dunce.
She cant remove an nonviable fetus.
As it should.
Woman have the right to choose not to get pregnant. Why do you leftists think they don't? Should abortion be a form of birth control?
We're not the one's fabricating straw men snowflake. Ask an Islamic Fascist why the men don't get stoned in those primitive societies.
Please QUOTE THAT from the law. Carrying a DEAD FETUS is a physical health threat, and can be remedied under the law.
Dead does not = nonviable.
LIE and LAME. Of course you have a credible link supporting this moronic claim right? Not.
If it is nonviable and a threat to her life, she can. Why lie about this scarecrow?
"Shariah is Anti-Constitutional
Whether pursued through the violent form of jihad (holy war) or stealthier practices that shariah Islamists often refer to as "dawa" (the "call to Islam"), shariah rejects fundamental premises of American society and values:
the bedrock proposition that the governed have a right to make law for themselves;
the democratic republic governed by the Constitution;
freedom of conscience; individual liberty
freedom of expression (including the liberty to analyze and criticize shariah);
economic liberty (including private property);
equal treatment under the law (including that of men and women, and of Muslims and non-Muslims);
freedom from cruel and unusual punishments; an unequivocal condemnation of terrorism (i.e., one that is based on a common sense meaning of the term and does not rationalize barbarity as legitimate "resistance"); and
an abiding commitment to deflate and resolve political controversies by the ordinary mechanisms of our democratic republic, not wanton violence. The subversion campaign known as "civilization jihad" must not be confused with, or tolerated as, a constitutionally protected form of religious practice. Its ambitions transcend what American law recognizes as the sacrosanct realm of private conscience and belief. It seeks to supplant our Constitution with its own totalitarian framework."
Whether pursued through the violent form of jihad (holy war) or stealthier practices that shariah Islamists often refer to as "dawa" (the "call to Islam"), shariah rejects fundamental premises of American society and values:
the bedrock proposition that the governed have a right to make law for themselves;
the democratic republic governed by the Constitution;
freedom of conscience; individual liberty
freedom of expression (including the liberty to analyze and criticize shariah);
economic liberty (including private property);
equal treatment under the law (including that of men and women, and of Muslims and non-Muslims);
freedom from cruel and unusual punishments; an unequivocal condemnation of terrorism (i.e., one that is based on a common sense meaning of the term and does not rationalize barbarity as legitimate "resistance"); and
an abiding commitment to deflate and resolve political controversies by the ordinary mechanisms of our democratic republic, not wanton violence. The subversion campaign known as "civilization jihad" must not be confused with, or tolerated as, a constitutionally protected form of religious practice. Its ambitions transcend what American law recognizes as the sacrosanct realm of private conscience and belief. It seeks to supplant our Constitution with its own totalitarian framework."
I see you have moved from strawmen to outright lying now. One can almost predict this sequence with every thread you begin. Yay you!
So you cannot quote directly from the law to support your strawman? I am not surprised.
So now you are moving those goalposts to a new strawman? So why must the fetus be killed? Can it not be brought to full term and adopted?
Are most abortion cases the result of rape snowflake? What is the percentage? Do you know?