We are just witnessing more of the "Dunning–Kruger effect" in action as it applies to Trump fans.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/markmu...ven-when-their-work-is-terrible/#29ab05795d7c
Last edited:
Ken Starr's Report had NO "MAYBEs" or "MIGHT HAVEs". It was CLEAR
- Thread starter Grokmaster
- Start date
We are just witnessing more of the "Dunning–Kruger effect" in action as it applies to Trump fans.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/markmu...ven-when-their-work-is-terrible/#29ab05795d7c
lol.. Mueller creates a new standard!
"NOT not guilty"
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Ken Starr went on a fishing expedition when he couldn't get evidence to prove that Hillary was guilty of insider trading violations. He used an ILLEGAL WIRE TAP by a Linda Tripp, then put the heat on Slick Willy regarding his dalliance with Lewinsky … so the result was an article of impeachment about the President lying to Congress....about an act of infidelity that was NO THREAT to national security or had anything to do with Whitewater Gate.
And when all was said and done, polling showed the American people didn't give a damn because the economy was actually looking better in regards to real jobs, and the budget was balanced with a surplus.
Mueller did his job within the legal limits of his office. That the MAGA wearers and most anti-Trump don't like it is TGDB! The ball is now in Congress court.
Got it? Good.
And when all was said and done, polling showed the American people didn't give a damn because the economy was actually looking better in regards to real jobs, and the budget was balanced with a surplus.
Mueller did his job within the legal limits of his office. That the MAGA wearers and most anti-Trump don't like it is TGDB! The ball is now in Congress court.
Got it? Good.
Mueller did not cite a crime. he pointed out many of them. Trump is guilty of obstruction and there is no doubt. There are over 1000 prosecutors across the country who say prosecuting Trump would be a snap. Here are 3 of them. https://www.newsweek.com/ex-gop-fed...-trump-obstructed-justice-viral-video-1441394
Darth Omar
Russian asset
lol.. Mueller creates a new standard!
At least that’s a double negative lol!
Mullet didn’t just stumble out of law school so you have to think his obfuscation was intentional.
Darth Omar
Russian asset
I don’t think that would be admissible as evidence lol.
Clicking on the button that says ‘yes, I think Trump is guilty of obstruction’ is light years away from actually taking the indictments to court. Getting a conviction under the circumstances would be a long shot.
Which, is precisely why Mullet gave his ‘inconclusive conclusion’. And since Mullet wouldn’t give a conclusion even after asked for it, Barr and Rosenstein made it for him.
It’s actually pretty cut and dry.
What an obtuse comparison. Trump's crimes are surrounded by a network of cronies and business ties encompassing multiple continents and a huge cast of players who Mueller stated scrubbed evidence, whereas Clinton's crime was a lie about one blow job...
And btw OP...Mueller was crystal clear.
Them why didn't Mueller INDICT THEM?
Makeup much BULLSHIT ??
Neither could STARR, OTHER THAN IN HIS REPORT, but he had NO TRUBLE LISTING ACTUAL, DETERMINED CRIMES....no "might've been", "could maybe be", "I COULDN'T MAKE A DETERMINATION" BULLSHIT.
If MUELLER HAD PROOF OF CRIMES, he WOULD HAVE SAID SO....just LIEK STARR DID.
HE DID NOT.
MUELLER WAS UPSET THAT AFTER TWO+ YEARS, HE HAD NO COLLUSION and NOTHING BUT "MAYBE-COULDA-MIGHTA BEENS" on the BULLSHIT " OBSTRUCTION CLAIMS HE DID NOT PROVE, because he IS STILL PISSED ABOUT NOT GETTING THE FBI JOB HE INTERVIEWED FOR, the DAY BEFORE RAT-FACED RSOENSTEIN NAME DHIM SPECIAL COUNSEL.
PERIOD.
What is this we hear about you cyber-stalking women?
Yes, this article is by Ken Starr
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/585577/
[FONT="]Robert Mueller is not your everyday prosecutor, however. Under Department of Justice policy, a sitting president cannot be indicted. This prosecutor, unlike other prosecutors, cannot indict if he finds an indictable offense. And in contrast to the practices and policies that govern thousands of federal prosecutors around the country, this former FBI director—now a special counsel—has a specific reporting obligation. That solemn obligation is [/FONT]not[FONT="] to produce a public report. He cannot seek an indictment. And he must remain quiet...[/FONT]
[FONT="]
[/FONT]
Can't read? READ THE OP..STARR COULD NOT INDICT CLINTON EITHER but he COULD and DID CLEARLTY LIST CRIMES HE FOUND...UNLIKE THE SOUR-GRAPES MUELLER< who FOUND NONE, per his OWN REPORT.
Well, Super Moderator, Mueller could have advised Congress that there was enough evidence to impeach President Trump. he did NOT.
Teflon Don
I'm back baby
I seem to remember when Rudy Giuliani posited that a sitting president couldn’t be indicted JPP lefties called “bullshit”. Now they act like they knew it all along
Lol, type bigger
Centerleftfl
Verified User
Besides the CHEERLEADER skirt, every syllable is TRUE.
FYI Guess who one of the REP lawyer "operators" were in the STARR team. JUDGE "rape 'em if you can" KAVANAUGH.
[FONT="]Under the regulations that governed his appointment and now guide his final acts, Mueller is to provide a confidential report to one person only: the attorney general. The regulations, which were promulgated during the final months of the Clinton administration, do not contemplate any sort of report sent directly from the special counsel to Congress or the general public
[/FONT]https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/585577/[FONT="]
[/FONT]
Centerleftfl
Verified User
These are important questions. I doubt Bob Mueller looked into Trump's sex life. Probably stuck to shit like Russian connections and if there was some kind of cover-up. We need to get Ken Starr on this ASAP!
Did Trump get a blow job? How about anal sex, any of that? 'Water Sports', there's rumors. Why aren't Republicans DEMANDING this???
Of course he didn't look into Trump's sex life. He didn't look into his FINANCES either. Funny, Starr looked at Clinton's FINANCES and endef up in his SEX LIFE.
You know just can make this shit up.
Centerleftfl
Verified User
And its 'edict' is wrong. If there are RUSSIAN actions into US electoral systems, processes and hardware, then we need the entire report. YESTERDAY.
'MEDDLING' in our election by a hostile foreign power USING AMERICANS help is a bullshit. It is a bullshit euphemism or cover word for TRAITORS.
Last edited: