even under YOUR reading of that line it only secures you the right to muskets idiot
Is our military limited to muskets?
even under YOUR reading of that line it only secures you the right to muskets idiot
even under YOUR reading of that line it only secures you the right to muskets idiot

Democratic states have tougher gun control (CA, CT) with with waiting periods, bans on assault weapons...and they don't seem to be doing any better. How are the GOP and NRA stopping these states from passing whatever gun regulations they want to?
Nobody has lost any argument to you, least of all me.
I addressed all your bullshit from the beginning and I'm not wasting my afternoon playing rwnj bullshit word games.
The reason we have an epidemic level of mass shootings I this country is because this country is awash in guns that are too easy to get.
The blame for both of those situations lies with the Republican Party, the political right, the NRA, the gun industry and the low brow rubes who keep them in power with their votes.
Simple as that.
when the framers wrote that line muskets were what arms were idiot
they didn't know what man would later invent huh
they found it fine for a society that has to HUNT for their meat should be allowed to have muskets to do it with
they didn't know what man would later invent huh
how would they have decided about the well regulated militia arming if Nukes were a reality then?
Oh and BTW
your reading of what the line means is idiocy anyway
Nobody has lost any argument to you, least of all me.
I addressed all your bullshit from the beginning and I'm not wasting my afternoon playing rwnj bullshit word games.
The reason we have an epidemic level of mass shootings I this country is because this country is awash in guns that are too easy to get.
The blame for both of those situations lies with the Republican Party, the political right, the NRA, the gun industry and the low brow rubes who keep them in power with their votes.
Simple as that.
You mean like these guys?
![]()
The ones who murdered three civil rights volunteers in the 1960's for trying to register blacks to vote, then got acquitted?
Like them?
Stupid question.
He was able to freely exercise his 2nd Amendment rights thanks to the GOP, their highly paid shills at the NRA and the low IQ droolers who vote for them.
Then why weren't these "mass shootings" occurring when guns were even easier to get, prior to all the regulations being passed??
Stupid question.
Nomad claimed the shooter was exercising his 2nd amendment rights. Since when does the 2nd protect someone's right to murder?
Black criminal celebrities often play the race card and get away with it. OJ got away with double murder by playing the race card. Smollett just got away with a hate crime against Trump supporters, even though if his plan worked, there would have been race riots, by playing the race card. Playing the race card often works, and blacks anticipate getting away with crimes.
Statistics show that blacks are incarcerated in disproportionately larger numbers than whites, so they're hardly "getting away with crimes."
I’ve read about it. The media’s focus is now on the victims and not the shooters. It has been for the last few shootings. They are trying not to glamorize the crimes. I support this. The focus should be on the victims, not the idiots that commit the crimes.This story will be IGNORED within two or three days by the mainstream media. No long lectures, no deep concerns about racial or political hatred and certainly no mention of Trump!
Statistics show that blacks are incarcerated in disproportionately larger numbers than whites, so they're hardly "getting away with crimes."
It doesn't and he knows it.
He's just fishing for attention, as usual.
It's what happens when all he has are his "emotions".
Any chance that it's a result of Blacks committing disproportionally larger number of crimes??