Teflon Don
I'm back baby
Why didn't the government indict anyone in the Capone mob for racketeering or murder?
I guess they mustn't have been racketeers or killers, eh?
Is that your argument?
Why didn't the government indict anyone in the Capone mob for racketeering or murder?
I guess they mustn't have been racketeers or killers, eh?
lies.i.e. why did Manafort share polling data with Russian spies? Why did Trump's counsel try to tamper with Flynn?
The only fools here are the ones defending Trump, but refusing to explain why he and his people did what Mueller outlines in his report.
You're going to carry that baggage with you forever.
Not sure if you truly realize the implication of what you're doing.
lies.
lies.
lies.
Conservatives on these boards are using every rhetorical trick they can to avoid answering for what is spelled out in the Mueller report.
They are arguing the validity of the report itself, the credibility of Mueller, everything except the contents of the actual report.
When you start asking the "why" questions...i.e. why did Manafort share polling data with Russian spies? Why did Trump's counsel try to tamper with Flynn? Why did Trump order his son to lie about the June 2016 Trumnp Tower meeting with Russians? Why, why, why...that's when the Conservatives cease defending Trump and start attacking you. Attacking you for asking WHY these people did what they did.
Conservatives have no answer for the "why" because the "why" explains everything.
So that's why none of them want to read the Mueller Report...it answers the "why" and doesn't allow them to falsely equivocate.
Is that your argument?
meaningless rant.The problem with you is that you're a Russian troll whose job it is to come on these boards and test out bullshti before you disseminate it across broader social media.
So you create myriad IDs to argue the same points from, but with different voices (ostensibly...you eventually slide into the same habits that make it so easy to identify you...because you're lazy as fuck) to give the impression that there's more support for your bullshit than there actually is.
You astroturf on the internet to feel less secure in your failed arguments, beliefs, and policies.
You're not very good at this.
why do you still post lies about Kimilnik was a Russian agent when was a State Dept source?
and Dowd never interfered“I understand that you can’t join the joint defense; so that’s one thing. If, on the other hand, we have, there’s information that … implicates the president, then we’ve got a national security issue, or maybe a national security issue, I don’t know … some issue, we got to — we got to deal with, not only for the president, but for the country. So … uh … you know, then-then, you know, we need some kind of heads-up.” The phone call took place in November 2017.
more lies.. =nothing but lies from you.He was both.
Why did Manafort share polling data from MI, PA, WI, and MN with him?
Maybe you can answer that question because no other Conservative has been able to do so.
“not only for the president but for the country and that he wasn’t asking for “any confidential information.”” .
more lies.. =nothing but lies from you.He was both.
Why did Manafort share polling data from MI, PA, WI, and MN with him?
Maybe you can answer that question because no other Conservative has been able to do so.
more lies.. =nothing but lies from you.
There is absolutely NO CORROBORATING EVIDENCE OR TESTIMONY Kimilnik was a double agent.
You are just like Mueller making up a narrative to support your falsehoods
You are just like Mueller making up a narrative to support your falsehoods
Typical Muellerism.Then why did he reach out to someone he knew was cooperating with the Special Counsel in their investigation into Trump's activities?
Just to say "hi"?
Do you believe that?
don't pull that bullshit.. You know the issue is "Russian spy" you keep lying about.It's not a lie that Manafort shared polling data with Kilimnik.
I'm asking why did he do that?
Neither you, or any Conservative for that matter, can truthfully and sincerely answer that question without undermining your entire defense.