When you start asking "why?", their defense falls apart

The only fools here are the ones defending Trump, but refusing to explain why he and his people did what Mueller outlines in his report.

You're going to carry that baggage with you forever.

Not sure if you truly realize the implication of what you're doing.

the whole obama administration and corrupted deep state couldn't stop trump, so stfu and stop making idiot sounds.
 

The problem with you is that you're a Russian troll whose job it is to come on these boards and test out bullshti before you disseminate it across broader social media.

So you create myriad IDs to argue the same points from, but with different voices (ostensibly...you eventually slide into the same habits that make it so easy to identify you...because you're lazy as fuck) to give the impression that there's more support for your bullshit than there actually is.

You astroturf on the internet to feel less secure in your failed arguments, beliefs, and policies.

You're not very good at this.
 
Conservatives on these boards are using every rhetorical trick they can to avoid answering for what is spelled out in the Mueller report.

They are arguing the validity of the report itself, the credibility of Mueller, everything except the contents of the actual report.

When you start asking the "why" questions...i.e. why did Manafort share polling data with Russian spies? Why did Trump's counsel try to tamper with Flynn? Why did Trump order his son to lie about the June 2016 Trumnp Tower meeting with Russians? Why, why, why...that's when the Conservatives cease defending Trump and start attacking you. Attacking you for asking WHY these people did what they did.

Conservatives have no answer for the "why" because the "why" explains everything.

So that's why none of them want to read the Mueller Report...it answers the "why" and doesn't allow them to falsely equivocate.

It's not just for the Muller report it's for everything.
 
The problem with you is that you're a Russian troll whose job it is to come on these boards and test out bullshti before you disseminate it across broader social media.

So you create myriad IDs to argue the same points from, but with different voices (ostensibly...you eventually slide into the same habits that make it so easy to identify you...because you're lazy as fuck) to give the impression that there's more support for your bullshit than there actually is.

You astroturf on the internet to feel less secure in your failed arguments, beliefs, and policies.

You're not very good at this.
meaningless rant.
why do you still post lies about Kimilnik was a Russian agent when was a State Dept source?

and Dowd never interfered -you are perpetrating a Mueller lie as well
Why must you constantly lie?

'fraud,' citing difference between Mueller report, Dowd transcript
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/de...raud-after-reading-flynn-voicemail-transcript
Mueller had redacted the part of the voicemail where Dowd said he wanted the heads up “not only for the president but for the country” and that he wasn’t asking for “any confidential information.”

Dowd said, according to the transcript, “I understand that you can’t join the joint defense; so that’s one thing. If, on the other hand, we have, there’s information that … implicates the president, then we’ve got a national security issue, or maybe a national security issue, I don’t know … some issue, we got to — we got to deal with, not only for the president, but for the country. So … uh … you know, then-then, you know, we need some kind of heads-up.” The phone call took place in November 2017.
 
why do you still post lies about Kimilnik was a Russian agent when was a State Dept source?

He was both.

Why did Manafort share polling data from MI, PA, WI, and MN with him?

Maybe you can answer that question because no other Conservative has been able to do so.
 
and Dowd never interfered“I understand that you can’t join the joint defense; so that’s one thing. If, on the other hand, we have, there’s information that … implicates the president, then we’ve got a national security issue, or maybe a national security issue, I don’t know … some issue, we got to — we got to deal with, not only for the president, but for the country. So … uh … you know, then-then, you know, we need some kind of heads-up.” The phone call took place in November 2017.

That's witness tampering right there.
 
He was both.

Why did Manafort share polling data from MI, PA, WI, and MN with him?

Maybe you can answer that question because no other Conservative has been able to do so.
more lies.. =nothing but lies from you.

There is absolutely NO CORROBORATING EVIDENCE OR TESTIMONY Kimilnik was a double agent.

You are just like Mueller making up a narrative to support your falsehoods
 
“not only for the president but for the country and that he wasn’t asking for “any confidential information.”” .

Then why did he reach out to someone he knew was cooperating with the Special Counsel in their investigation into Trump's activities?

Just to say "hi"?

Do you believe that?
 
He was both.

Why did Manafort share polling data from MI, PA, WI, and MN with him?

Maybe you can answer that question because no other Conservative has been able to do so.
more lies.. =nothing but lies from you.

There is absolutely NO CORROBORATING EVIDENCE OR TESTIMONY Kimilnik was a double agent.

You are just like Mueller making up a narrative to support your falsehoods
 
more lies.. =nothing but lies from you.

It's not a lie that Manafort shared polling data with Kilimnik.

I'm asking why did he do that?

Neither you, or any Conservative for that matter, can truthfully and sincerely answer that question without undermining your entire defense.
 
There is absolutely NO CORROBORATING EVIDENCE OR TESTIMONY Kimilnik was a double agent.

Yes there is.

There's the source you use that he was an FBI informant, and there's the source the FBI uses that he was tied to Russian Intelligence.

We've posted both of those items.

So that's why he's a double agent.

But his status as a double agent, or an FBI informant, or a Russian spy has nothing to do with why Manafort shared polling data with him.

Why did Manafort share polling data with Kilimnik?
 
You are just like Mueller making up a narrative to support your falsehoods

Why did Manafort share polling data from PA, MI, WI, and MN with Kilimnik and just Kilimnik?

You simply won't answer that question; either because you don't know the reason, or you do know the reason and won't say it because of what it means for you, personally.
 
You are just like Mueller making up a narrative to support your falsehoods

Why did Manafort share polling data from PA, MI, WI, and MN with Kilimnik and just Kilimnik?

You simply won't answer that question; either because you don't know the reason, or you do know the reason and won't say it because of what it means for you, personally.
 
Then why did he reach out to someone he knew was cooperating with the Special Counsel in their investigation into Trump's activities?

Just to say "hi"?

Do you believe that?
Typical Muellerism.
Smear Dowd who had a right to check in "heads up" because he wanted to know it it was a national security issue


The QUESTION IS WHY DID MUELLER LIE about the phone call?
You and Mueller are the expert liars -so wjhy did he do that?
 
It's not a lie that Manafort shared polling data with Kilimnik.

I'm asking why did he do that?

Neither you, or any Conservative for that matter, can truthfully and sincerely answer that question without undermining your entire defense.
don't pull that bullshit.. You know the issue is "Russian spy" you keep lying about.

Who knows why Manafort did it? as long as it wasn't about "da Russians" it's not our concern.
I think he was doing a favor or paying him off -but none of that matters, yet Mueller had to lie about it!
 
Back
Top