Weak sauce is whining, lying and crying about polling data you dunce.
When you start asking "why?", their defense falls apart
- Thread starter LV426
- Start date
Weak sauce is whining, lying and crying about polling data you dunce.
How is sharing polling data from PA, WI, MI, and MN doing Kilimnik "a favor" or "paying him off"?
How is sharing polling data a national security issue? How is talking to Russians and national security issue? I see you are at FULL retard again today. Trump winning all the time has really triggered dishonest, whiny leftist assholes like you.
Ichabod Stain
Was it me?
holy projection, batman!
The only way sharing polling data was doing Kilimnik "a favor" was if Kilimnik was going to share that polling data with Russian Intelligence who would use it to direct troll attacks so Trump would be elected and their one-sided "peace plan" can be put into effect.
Otherwise, how is it a favor to Kilimnik to share the polling data with him?
Otherwise, how is it a favor to Kilimnik to share the polling data with him?
Teflon Don
I'm back baby
My argument is and has been very sound throughout this witch hunt
Your side predicted President Trump would be impeached by now. I told you that he committed no crimes, but you are too invested in this to see the troof
Adolf_Twitler
Verified User
Oh my God! You didn't! You didn't quote William Barr did you? Explains everything!
You are stupider than you look!
Yes it does; it explains why morons like you look like idiots thinking the Russians got Trump elected.
IRONY; buy a mirror and some self awareness dumbass.
Your argument has been that you refuse to read the report you are saying clears Trump.
StoneByStone
It's OK to Be White
We did?
Your side predicted everyone's wages would grow by $4,000-$9,000 if we cut taxes for the rich.
Your side predicted 3% GDP growth in 2018 if we cut taxes for the rich.
Your side predicted the tax cuts would pay for themselves.
Shut up.
Asked and answered multiple times, illiterate fucktard. That you can't understand simple English is on you, shitstain.
Loser
If you can't indict, you can't prosecute, stupid fuck.
“So that was Justice Department policy. Those were the principles under which we operated. And from them, we concluded that we would not reach a determination one way or the other about whether the president committed a crime.”
“As set forth in the report, after the investigation, if we had confidence that the president did not clearly commit a crime, we would have said so. We did not.”
Kilimnik worked for Deripaska, who had close ties to the Kremlin. Gates testified that it was understood Kilimnik would deliver the info to Deripaska.
This was the intent of Dowd's recorded call, idiot.
The parts of the Dowd phone call left out does nothing to change the intent.
-Don’t provide information that will implicate Trump
-Inform us what’s going on in order to protect Trump.
-Offering that a pardon was available if Flynn helped Trump.
Ichabod Stain
Was it me?
exoneration is not what special prosecutors do. he just pretended it's what they do give you nutbags gas for your crazy car.
Teflon Don
I'm back baby
I don't need to read it
You mean this one?
Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.
Barr: Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.