Lower IQ produces Racists and Conservatives

Reading what is highlighted. You would take away the right to vote for a person who is NOT on welfare in any way!
Example...I have been entirely OFF of any kind of welfare for my entire life, NEVER been on it, always employed...
so you would take way MY right to vote.

You realized you were wrong, so now you're playing semantics. :laugh:

You know what I meant. I meant that people who fund their lives entirely with welfare should not be allowed to vote.
 
Liberals support legalizing drugs, prostitution, and gambling. Conservatives generally don't.
Lie.
Liberals also support guns rights,
Lie.
they just want moderate gun control.
Paradox. Irrational statement. Which is it, dude?
They also support free markets.
Notice that the freest markets in the world are all in liberal countries.
Conservatives and Liberals both believe in some government regulations,
Paradox. Which is it, dude?
the difference is that Conservatives want that regulation to help the rich, and Liberals want that regulation to help the working-class.
Lie. Conservatives want to maintain the federated republic form of government we now have. Liberals and you want to destroy the United States and replace it with a fascism by oligarchy.
Anyone who tells you they don't want any regulations is full of shit, because Conservatives ONLY kick up a fuss when the regulations help the working-class.
Lie.
I checked the link and I'm going to call bullshit because Libertarians are literally the dumbest people.
Worse than Communists,
worse than Fascists,
worse than Cucksaders,
they're literally just too stupid to take their pants off before pooping.
Bigotry.
 
:laugh:

Reread my quote that YOU quoted. I'd be all for revoking a person's right to vote IF THEY LIVE ENTIRELY OFF WELFARE.

Of course if a person doesn't get any welfare, and they have an average or higher IQ, they should vote.

You are not a dictator. You don't get to decide who votes for what.
 
"No, I'd be all for revoking a person's right to vote if they live entirely off welfare."

Try reading that harder. If you still don't understand, have a smarter person explain it to you.

ENTIRELY OFF WELFARE. As in they're not working, and they're living off the money the government is sending them.

Paradox. Which is it, dude?
 
Reading what is highlighted. You would take away the right to vote for a person who is NOT on welfare in any way!
Example...I have been entirely OFF of any kind of welfare for my entire life, NEVER been on it, always employed...
so you would take way MY right to vote.

He's been speaking Liberal so long he's forgotten English. He no longer understands what 'on', 'off', 'yes', or 'no' means.
 
Back
Top