I think he's literally the dumbest person on the board.
Definitely a classic example of confusing style and substance.
I think he's literally the dumbest person on the board.
In English, the saying goes: "I know you are, but what am I"...Right. You Reichwingers and your childish "I know you are but what I am" "reasoning."![]()
No, you are claiming that the derogatory usage of the term is the ONLY usage of the term. That is where you are being a racist.Sorry, but pointing out that a term, phrase, or individual is seen as racist does not make the speaker a racist, much as you try to pin that tail on the donkey.
Continued racism... Why do you feel the need to be racist?The fact remains that in modern day America, the word "nigger" is seen as a racist and derogatory term. You kids argue all you want about that; it is not going to change reality.
No, that's yourself...I finally put him on ignore. He offers nothing of substance in rebuttal,
Then stop making racist arguments?only the same thing over and over....
If you make a public post onto a public forum, the public just might respond to it... Funny how that works, ain't it?and following your posts just to repeat it. Pfft.
Not even closeI think he's literally the dumbest person on the board.
In English, the saying goes: "I know you are, but what am I"...
No, you are claiming that the derogatory usage of the term is the ONLY usage of the term. That is where you are being a racist.
Continued racism... Why do you feel the need to be racist?
Let me quote these, since you're on ignore now...and I'm notNo, that's yourself...
Then stop making racist arguments?
If you make a public post onto a public forum, the public just might respond to it... Funny how that works, isn't it?
Let me quote these, since you're on ignore now...and I'm not![]()
This is why I laugh at the "ignore" feature, as she will still visibly see the posts of anyone who she decides to put on "ignore" so long as someone else who isn't on her ignore list decides to quote those posts in their own responses.
The "ignore" feature is simply a way of creating a "kiddie pool" (which is often times also referred to as an "echo chamber"). The person doing so is also committing the bulverism fallacy, as she is dismissing any argument that [insert person here] is making simply because [insert person here] is the one who is making the argument. I don't put anyone on "ignore", not only because it doesn't actually do what one wants it to do, but because even morons such as herself do make sound arguments once in a while.
They can respond, I just waste my time viewing their posts. They are still allowed to comment, I just have to see their regurgitations.No, that's yourself...
Then stop making racist arguments?
If you make a public post onto a public forum, the public just might respond to it... Funny how that works, ain't it?
This is why I laugh at the "ignore" feature, as she will still visibly see the posts of anyone who she decides to put on "ignore" so long as someone else who isn't on her ignore list decides to quote those posts in their own responses. It also doesn't in any way stop me from being able to respond to her posts. It DOES, however, stop her from being able to directly respond to my posts, so that's her loss really.
The "ignore" feature is simply a way of creating a "kiddie pool" (which is often times also referred to as an "echo chamber"). The person doing so is also committing the bulverism fallacy, as she is dismissing any argument that [insert person here] is making simply because [insert person here] is the one who is making the argument. I don't put anyone on "ignore", not only because it doesn't exactly do what is intended of it, but because even morons such as herself do make sound arguments once in a while. Also, I am a supporter of open discussion.
I put most racists on ignore, also people who wish I die of cancer. I really don’t care what your opinion is of the ignore feature. People use it for a myriad of reasons.

That's cool.Don't flatter yourself, moron. You're not on ignore.
Argument of the Stone Fallacy.I just chose to disregard your nonsense.
How do you know that my posts are "content-free" if you, as you have just admitted above, "disregard [my] nonsense" out of hand?Your posts are pleasingly content-free though, so I've missed nothing. lol
Then I'm sure Owl has made that list?I put most racists on ignore,
Okay.also people who wish I die of cancer.
Fine by me.I really don’t care what your opinion is of the ignore feature.
People use it because they do not support open discussion. They want to shut out certain voices. They want a kiddie pool to splash in since they can't handle the big boy pool.People use it for a myriad of reasons.
Welcome to our newest sock...
FUck you, go back to where you came from, report back when you know the true answer grasshopper..![]()

No, I’ve shown you your last statement isn’t factual.Then I'm sure Owl has made that list?
Okay.
Fine by me.
People use it because they do not support open discussion. They want to shut out certain voices. They want a kiddie pool to splash in since they can't handle the big boy pool.
No, I’ve shown you your last statement isn’t factual.
Not what a fact is... at least in English, anyway... In Liberal? I suppose we'd have to take a look at the ol' definition rotisserie to see what the word means at any specific moment of time...![]()
Fallacy fallacy.
I finally put him on ignore. He offers nothing of substance in rebuttal, only the same thing over and over.... and following your posts just to repeat it. Pfft.
Definitely a classic example of confusing style and substance.
Not even close![]()