Which is your favorite excuse for Trump's racist tweets about the Squad?

Which is your favorite excuse for Trump's racist tweets about the Squad?

  • It wasn't racism, it was xenophobia.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • They hate America,

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • He wasn't talking about the Squad.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    14
Right. You Reichwingers and your childish "I know you are but what I am" "reasoning." :laugh:
In English, the saying goes: "I know you are, but what am I"...

Sorry, but pointing out that a term, phrase, or individual is seen as racist does not make the speaker a racist, much as you try to pin that tail on the donkey.
No, you are claiming that the derogatory usage of the term is the ONLY usage of the term. That is where you are being a racist.

The fact remains that in modern day America, the word "nigger" is seen as a racist and derogatory term. You kids argue all you want about that; it is not going to change reality.
Continued racism... Why do you feel the need to be racist?
 
In English, the saying goes: "I know you are, but what am I"...


No, you are claiming that the derogatory usage of the term is the ONLY usage of the term. That is where you are being a racist.


Continued racism... Why do you feel the need to be racist?
No, that's yourself...


Then stop making racist arguments?


If you make a public post onto a public forum, the public just might respond to it... Funny how that works, isn't it?
Let me quote these, since you're on ignore now...and I'm not;)
 
Let me quote these, since you're on ignore now...and I'm not;)

This is why I laugh at the "ignore" feature, as she will still visibly see the posts of anyone who she decides to put on "ignore" so long as someone else who isn't on her ignore list decides to quote those posts in their own responses. It also doesn't in any way stop me from being able to respond to her posts. It DOES, however, stop her from being able to directly respond to my posts, so that's her loss really.


The "ignore" feature is simply a way of creating a "kiddie pool" (which is often times also referred to as an "echo chamber"). The person doing so is also committing the bulverism fallacy, as she is dismissing any argument that [insert person here] is making simply because [insert person here] is the one who is making the argument. I don't put anyone on "ignore", not only because it doesn't exactly do what is intended of it, but because even morons such as herself do make sound arguments once in a while. Also, I am a supporter of open discussion.
 
Last edited:
This is why I laugh at the "ignore" feature, as she will still visibly see the posts of anyone who she decides to put on "ignore" so long as someone else who isn't on her ignore list decides to quote those posts in their own responses.


The "ignore" feature is simply a way of creating a "kiddie pool" (which is often times also referred to as an "echo chamber"). The person doing so is also committing the bulverism fallacy, as she is dismissing any argument that [insert person here] is making simply because [insert person here] is the one who is making the argument. I don't put anyone on "ignore", not only because it doesn't actually do what one wants it to do, but because even morons such as herself do make sound arguments once in a while.

I put most racists on ignore, also people who wish I die of cancer. I really don’t care what your opinion is of the ignore feature. People use it for a myriad of reasons.
 
No, that's yourself...


Then stop making racist arguments?


If you make a public post onto a public forum, the public just might respond to it... Funny how that works, ain't it?
They can respond, I just waste my time viewing their posts. They are still allowed to comment, I just have to see their regurgitations.
 
This is why I laugh at the "ignore" feature, as she will still visibly see the posts of anyone who she decides to put on "ignore" so long as someone else who isn't on her ignore list decides to quote those posts in their own responses. It also doesn't in any way stop me from being able to respond to her posts. It DOES, however, stop her from being able to directly respond to my posts, so that's her loss really.


The "ignore" feature is simply a way of creating a "kiddie pool" (which is often times also referred to as an "echo chamber"). The person doing so is also committing the bulverism fallacy, as she is dismissing any argument that [insert person here] is making simply because [insert person here] is the one who is making the argument. I don't put anyone on "ignore", not only because it doesn't exactly do what is intended of it, but because even morons such as herself do make sound arguments once in a while. Also, I am a supporter of open discussion.

Don't flatter yourself, moron. You're not on ignore. I just chose to disregard your nonsense. Your posts are pleasingly content-free though, so I've missed nothing. lol
 
I put most racists on ignore, also people who wish I die of cancer. I really don’t care what your opinion is of the ignore feature. People use it for a myriad of reasons.

Isn't it funny how triggered some get when they are ignored? :laugh:

PS -- Yes, Toxic TOP *is* one of the dumbest posters here, as Stone pointed out, along with Night. Remember when she thought Stone was Jade and talked about it for days?
 
I put most racists on ignore,
Then I'm sure Owl has made that list? ;)

also people who wish I die of cancer.
Okay.

I really don’t care what your opinion is of the ignore feature.
Fine by me.

People use it for a myriad of reasons.
People use it because they do not support open discussion. They want to shut out certain voices. They want a kiddie pool to splash in since they can't handle the big boy pool.
 
Then I'm sure Owl has made that list? ;)


Okay.


Fine by me.


People use it because they do not support open discussion. They want to shut out certain voices. They want a kiddie pool to splash in since they can't handle the big boy pool.
No, I’ve shown you your last statement isn’t factual.
 
No, I’ve shown you your last statement isn’t factual.

Not what a fact is... at least in English, anyway... In Liberal? I suppose we'd have to take a look at the ol' definition rotisserie to see what the word means at any specific moment of time... ;)
 
Not what a fact is... at least in English, anyway... In Liberal? I suppose we'd have to take a look at the ol' definition rotisserie to see what the word means at any specific moment of time... ;)

Typical tactic, Thanks for amusing me.
 
Not even close;)

Thanks for your support. They refer to me this way because I am among their biggest threat.

They deny science. I point out the theories of science they are denying.
They deny mathematics. I point out the mathematics they are denying.
They deny logic. I point out the logic they are denying.
They deny history. I point out the history they are denying.
They deny philosophy. I point out the reasoning they are denying.

I don't give an inch with these idiots. There is no need to.
 
Back
Top