even michael moore admits democrats today totally blew it

[Earl]

No collusion, insufficent evidence to pursue obstruction.

“Case closed.” McConnell.

 

[Althea]

It did nothing of the sort, the Mueller investigation was not designed to exonerate, it was a political stunt by democrats run by Wiesman with Mueller as the figure head to discredit Trump, it blew up in your face when they found no evidence to Charge him with Obstruction!

Blah, blah, blah. Take this nonsense to some other thread.

 

[rjhenn]

It did nothing of the sort, the Mueller investigation was not designed to exonerate, it was a political stunt by democrats run by Wiesman with Mueller as the figure head to discredit Trump, it blew up in your face when they found no evidence to Charge him with Obstruction!

There was plenty of evidence of obstruction. Mueller just wasn't allowed to go there.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[Sailor]

I don't think he's lying. Looks more like a wimpering last gasp before total defeat. Have you noticed how long ago since he had that octuple cheeseburger for his av?
Have you also noticed he's dead wrong about everything?

I have noticed how wrong he is. Gone in the top hamper! And I absolutely like what is bolded above! HA!

 

[rjhenn]

Indeed...spot on.

The usual delusions of Trump cultists.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[rjhenn]

No collusion, insufficent evidence to pursue obstruction.

“Case closed.” McConnell.

Plenty of evidence, but, as stated, DOJ policy didn't allow him to pursue it.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[Truth Detector]

Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.), who asked if the reason Mueller did not indict the president was because of a Justice Department policy memo by the Office of Legal Counsel that bars indictment of a sitting president.
“That is correct,” Mueller answered.

Mueller: “I want to go back to one thing that was said this morning by Mr. Lieu, who said, and I quote, ‘you didn’t charge the president because of the OLC opinion.'”

“That is not the correct way to say it,”

“As we say in the report, and as I said in the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime.”

 

[Sailor]

I suspect he's walking around in circles at this very moment repeating over and over, "Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.), who asked if the reason Mueller did not indict the president was because of a Justice Department policy memo by the Office of Legal Counsel that bars indictment of a sitting president.
“That is correct,” Mueller answered."
I guess it's tough when you come to the realization that your hopes and dreams have come to an end. But he's not handling it well.
Another complete breakdown by McSlawber.

His world is crashing down. His hopes of fee shit have been dashed to pieces. He cannot deny the racism nor lunacy of the left in this country. His "Californian dreaming" has become a shit hole due to left wing policies.

 

[Truth Detector]

Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.), who asked if the reason Mueller did not indict the president was because of a Justice Department policy memo by the Office of Legal Counsel that bars indictment of a sitting president.
“That is correct,” Mueller answered.

Even your Russian spin doctors cannot unsay this ^^^

Mueller: “I want to go back to one thing that was said this morning by Mr. Lieu, who said, and I quote, ‘you didn’t charge the president because of the OLC opinion.'”

“That is not the correct way to say it,”

“As we say in the report, and as I said in the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime.”

 

[Truth Detector]

Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.), who asked if the reason Mueller did not indict the president was because of a Justice Department policy memo by the Office of Legal Counsel that bars indictment of a sitting president.
“That is correct,” Mueller answered.

whackamole! A Russian one!

Mueller: “I want to go back to one thing that was said this morning by Mr. Lieu, who said, and I quote, ‘you didn’t charge the president because of the OLC opinion.'”

“That is not the correct way to say it,”

“As we say in the report, and as I said in the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime.”

 

[Truth Detector]

Fuck people never learn. It was totally fucking stupid when Republicans impeached Clinton for purely partisan reasons with no regard what so ever for the people who’s lives were ruined by them over nothing.

Clinton lied under oath and obstructed Justice. The notion that a sitting President who bangs interns is more fit than Trump can only be expressed by liars and idiots.

It backfired on the GOP

How so? Did Republicans lose control of the House or the Senate?

and if Democrats go down that same stupid road they deserve whatever backlash that hits them in the face.

NOTHING that the Party of the Jackass does will prevent them from losing in 2020. They are bereft of ideas and can only spew Marxist dogma.

Unless you have direct evidence of a high crime or misdemeanor you ain’t got shit and no golden shower by a Russian hooker is going to get Trump impeached.

Correct.

What really pisses me off is we have direct evidence of a foreign power interfering in our elections and one side is willing to ignore that to impeach a President for partisan paybacks and the other side is willing to ignore it so they can pick peanuts out of Trumps shit and eat them. Not one partisan mother fucker actually gives a rats ass about our country.

I have to laugh at the notion of you being impartial. You voted for the Party that is full of shit and Obama who laughed at the notion that our election systems could be hacked.

But in the end, NOT ONE vote was affected or changed as a result of the minuscule efforts by foreign powers. The whole Russia HOAX was an effort to cover for DNC corruption and a soft coup led by Democratic Party hacks in the Justice Department and quite possibly, as far up as the White House.

The one thing these corrupt Democrats didn't plan on; Trump winning the election.

 

[Truth Detector]

Impeachment is apparently whatever a majority votes it to be, from perjurious bj denial to anything you want...

WRONG; but then you have never been right so there is that. Clinton wasn't impeached for a BJ. He was impeached for obstruction of justice and lying under oath.

Of course, in moron land where you wallow, a sitting married President that gets BJ's from interns is someone who shows good judgement. Moron.

There will be no blowback. It is going to be gruesomely media attn sapping investigations and constant attack on anything and everything
Trump says or does from the second he stole office to the second he is unceremoniously voted out. That is exactly according to plan.
It's working. His ratings have been deplorable from day one and have never waivered much. The plan is wrong the second he starts having good approval.
We will turn out strong and destroy his base in numbers. We will make his a failed presidency by unrelenting attack.
Has he ever polled above 50 percent for anything other than sucking ass and lying?

I do hope the idiots in the Party of the Jackass are as dumb as you. Really I do.

 

[Truth Detector]

I know he took it back, moron. I don't accept that take back.

Translation; "I don't accept facts or the truth. Just the false narratives I parrot."

 

[archives]

OOOOOOPS!!!

Mueller: “I want to go back to one thing that was said this morning by Mr. Lieu, who said, and I quote, ‘you didn’t charge the president because of the OLC opinion.'”

“That is not the correct way to say it,”

“As we say in the report, and as I said in the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime.”

Yet Mueller did say that Trump could be indited once he left office:

"Former special counsel Robert Mueller on Wednesday said that he believes President Trump could be charged with obstruction of justice after he leaves office."

“Could you charge the president with a crime after he left office?” Rep. Ken Buck (R-Colo.) asked Mueller during the former special counsel's testimony."

“Yes,” Mueller replied.

"Mueller said that because of the DOJ guidance, “one of the tools that a prosecutor would use is not there.”

https://thehill.com/policy/national...-be-charged-with-obstruction-of-justice-after

 

[Truth Detector]

How could anybody possibly be against a moral guy like Trump? Did you attend Trump University?

What was moral about Bill Clinton?

 

[Truth Detector]

lol Trump U

Professor Emeritus Donald

It's obvious you went to FLUNK U.

 

[Truth Detector]

Everything Trump has been accused of Mueller confirmed but he did not go the extra mile and outright call this cancerous mass out as the gangster he is.

LIE and LAME. But lying, crying and flailing are your repertoire of stupid.

 

[Truth Detector]

He’s also receiving major criticism for it on Twitter. There are people who don’t agree with his OPINION. I am one of those.

Moore must be a TrumptTard!

You're too stupid to realize he has been right twice now while you whiny morons are still getting everything wrong.

 

[archives]

What was moral about Bill Clinton?

Clinton? Wow, now we are going back decades to find a "whataboutism," funny

What about Warren Harding?

 

[Truth Detector]

Opening statement:

"Based on Justice Department policy and principles of fairness, we decided we would not make a determination as to whether the President committed a crime. That was our decision then and it remains our decision today."

Mueller: “As we say in the report, and as I said in the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime.”