reagansghost
eternal
That was the intent of the 2nd Amendment.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
are you part of a well regulated militia Rambo Jr?
That was the intent of the 2nd Amendment.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
so in short, we can chalk this thread up as an example of the extremes of lib'rul stupidity.......
Shotguns would do a lot more damage and kill more. The Capital Gazette shooting was accomplished with a shotgun. We're fortunate that all these mass shooters are too ignorant to use shotguns. A Street Sweeper would probably boost the death toll and would certainly boost the number of injured.so why don't these right wing domestic terrorists use pistols and shotguns if assault weapons are no big deal?.....and don't post a link showing a right wing domestic terrorist wielding a shotgun and/or a pistol - they all do that...….what weapon does 99% of the killing?
are you a fuckin moron?
It was allowed to expire, primarily because there was no evidence that it was doing any good. I'm not the one displaying extremely high levels of stupidity.are assault weapons still banned?
are you really this fucking stupid?
Shotguns would do a lot more damage and kill more.
Again, that's your opinion
You clearly have trouble understanding English. The 2nd Amendment doesn't require participation in a militia. It was intended to assure that the citizenry would be familiar with firearms, making them suitable for service in a militia. And I doubt that you know what "well regulated" actually means.are you part of a well regulated militia Rambo Jr?
It was allowed to expire, primarily because there was no evidence that it was doing any good.
are you part of a well regulated militia Rambo Jr?
Semantics. You know what people mean. It's fewer syllables than calling them 'weapons with large capacity for damage before reloading'.You wouldn't know an "assault weapon" if you got shot in the ass with one. And the reason is, your masters have not even defined an "assault weapon" for you yet. No 2nd amendment supporter wants a damned socialist democrat defining "bad guns". Pretty soon, my little SA .22 revolver will be a fucking "assault weapon", and you leftard nazis will be taking a battering ram to my door to take it from me
You clearly have trouble understanding English. The 2nd Amendment doesn't require participation in a militia.
yes, but more importantly, WHY AREN'T YOU????????
An AR-15 is only "military grade" in the delusions of ignoratti such as yourself. I don't believe that our military uses them even for training purposes. They aren't using shotguns instead because, fortunately, they're just as ignorant as you are.then why aren't all these radical right wing domestic terrorists using shotguns instead of military grade assault weapons?
think this shit through a little, get back to me
An AR-15 is only "military grade" in the delusions of ignoratti such as yourself.
You have proven to be full of bullshit, just like all control freaks.got any proof of that or is it just more bullshit?
then why is a well regulated militia mentioned in the 2d amendment...…….the authors were drunk?
You have proven to be full of bullshit, just like all control freaks.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Originally Posted by rjhenn
An AR-15 is only "military grade" in the delusions of ignoratti such as yourself
Which isn't really a definition of anything. It could refer to anything from a butcher knife to a Mack truck.Semantics. You know what people mean. It's fewer syllables than calling them 'weapons with large capacity for damage before reloading'.
don't need a militia, I'm American