OK walmart shooting

Hello Celticguy,



40,000 people a year die in gun deaths in the USA.

Congratulations, NRA. That is a new record. That is a record gun profiteers should be proud of.

It surpasses the deaths on American highways, despite more people driving more miles than ever.

Gun profiteers must be laughing all the way to the bank.

The more blood that flows the more money they make.

Destroying lives for profit.

Imagine all the heartache of those left behind.

Children without parents.

Parents having to bury their children.

Wow. That's some serious sorrow.

That's the kind of thing that sticks with a person.

That destroys their ability to enjoy life.

In a way, more lives are taken than just the ones who bleed out.

The NRA should be just as proud of all that heartache and misery as they are over the blood.

It is a testament to their profits.

And you've done what to help with this problem? Nothing. Not one damn thing.
The NRA, however, holds firearm safety and proper handling courses at many
gun clubs across the US. I know. I taught them.
It is ludicrous, bordering defamation, to accuse us of murder, as you have above.
I, for one, would like to see where any of our membership has been convicted of
ANY firearm related crime, much less murder.
We are also not in the business of selling firearms, that is another of your myths.
We are not licensed to sell firearms. It would be against the law if we sold them.
So why must you blame us? We're trying to teach the public to become responsible
gun owners, yet you accuse us of being murderers? But still, you've done nothing.
Yeah, I know, you have me on ignore, but I'd like a reply from you without all the
ridiculous rhetoric and trying to lay a guilt trip down. Answer it straight to the point.
 
Uh huh. And the Internet is going to be destroyed by repealing Net Neutrality, and Hillary will win in a landslide, and Trump will never even win the nomination, and the Russia collusion conspiracy theory will impeach Trump...blah, blah, blah.

We get it. You're a brainwashed TDS Kool-Aid guzzler who never learns no matter how many times your CNN propaganda humiliates and discredits you.

:laugh:

:thumbsup:
 
Hello Celticguy,



40,000 people a year die in gun deaths in the USA.

Congratulations, NRA. That is a new record. That is a record gun profiteers should be proud of.

It surpasses the deaths on American highways, despite more people driving more miles than ever.

Gun profiteers must be laughing all the way to the bank.

The more blood that flows the more money they make.

Destroying lives for profit.

Imagine all the heartache of those left behind.

Children without parents.

Parents having to bury their children.

Wow. That's some serious sorrow.

That's the kind of thing that sticks with a person.

That destroys their ability to enjoy life.

In a way, more lives are taken than just the ones who bleed out.

The NRA should be just as proud of all that heartache and misery as they are over the blood.

It is a testament to their profits.

A more studied look
https://www.forbes.com/sites/elizab...s-is-28b-the-gun-violence-business-is-bigger/
 
Debunked Liberal Lie: "The 2nd Amendment only protects the right of the states to maintain militias, rather than the right of individuals to bear arms."

-Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution already provides for the existence of such militias. There would be no reason for the 2nd Amendment to exist if this were correct.

-When the Framers drafted the Bill of Rights, they went out of their way to specify “The People” when talking about the rights of the individual and “The States” when talking about the rights of state governments. For liberals to be correct on this, the 2nd Amendment (‘the right of The People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed’) would have to be the only place in the entire document in which the meanings were reversed.

-The term “well-regulated” in 1789 meant correctly-calibrated and properly formed. There is abundant evidence of this and it is beyond dispute. When the first part of the 2nd Amendment justifies gun rights by explaining, “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state…,” it is clarifying that you cannot have the kind of disciplined and well-trained citizen militias necessary to repel foreign invasions, put down unrest, and resist government tyranny without an armed populace. This was made unmistakably clear by Alexander Hamilton’s discussion of militias in Federalist 29, and by the original wording of the 2nd Amendment:

“The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; a well armed and well regulated militia being the best security of a free country.”

But liberals deliberately misrepresent the 2nd Amendment’s wording to argue that the Founders (who used armed revolution to overthrow the government) only actually supported the right of states to operate their own government-controlled militias, despite them being on the record emphatically stating the opposite. These would be the same Founding Fathers who made it a requirement that every citizen own a firearm at one point.

Liberals also cite examples of armed rebellions that were put down by George Washington as proof that our Founders never intended for us to be able to take up arms against federal tyranny. But this flies in the face of everything we know about the Founding Fathers, who talked routinely about refreshing the “tree of liberty” with the “blood of patriots and tyrants,” and who enthusiastically embraced such rights in no uncertain terms in the Declaration of Independence.

Yet again, like the rest of the Bill of Rights, the 2nd Amendment was drafted specifically to convince New York and Virginia that this new Federal Government we were creating would never be able to trample their Natural Right to self-rule as an armed, free people. The Founding Fathers had no illusions about the tyrannical inclinations of government, and they enshrined gun rights in the Constitution as a protection of the states and The People against the Federal Government for the clear and stated purpose of armed resistance to tyranny.

This is an undeniable fact that liberals simply choose to lie about non-stop…as with everything else they say about the Constitution. The 2nd Amendment provably bans all federal gun laws.

View attachment 12715

FEDERAL GUN LEGISLATION Is the compromise for intentionally misrepresenting the 2nd amendment
 
Votes of reason go nowhere in Idaho, cunt. I just explained that.
So you just insulted 1.75 million people.
There you go again with your simplistic, binary thinking typical of RW, barrel stroking simpletons.
Inversion fallacy. It is YOU that making simplistic arguments.
Nobody claims that ANY law will STOP all gun crimes.
You do.
That is your moronic RW mantra.
No, this is moronic LW mantra. Inversion fallacy.
The idea is to take measures to reduce gun violence as much as possible.
Shoot back. The homicide rate is quite low in the United States.The number of guns involved in violence of any kind is VERY low.
That's been explaied to you idiots uncountable number of times.
...deleted irrelevant material...
No. It has been denied by YOU uncountable number of times.
 
Fuck you with all your constitutional rights bullshit.
You don't give a shit how many people get gunned down,just as long as you can play with your guns.

Fuck your fascism. The United States is a federated republic. If you don't like the Constitution, leave.
 
So, I should give up my constitutional rights just because you oppose them?
I've done my part to train people to safely use firearms. What have you done?
Give up my constitutional rights? NO! That's NEVER gonna happen. Ever. Period.

...and thank you for your work. You sound like an excellent firearms instructor.
 
Lived here my entire life, cunt. This is a great place to live despite the number of idiots of your caliber. Why would I move?

Plant a tree? lol The analogy went completely over your head, stupid fuck.

What a fucking moron.

:rofl2:

Paradox. You are being irrational again. Which is it, dude?
 
I have dozens of times, cunt. You're merely another willfully ignorant barrel-stroker that can't comprehend simple English.

Get the fuck off the forum, ass sniffer, and let the collective IQ increase.

:rofl2:

You are not speaking English. You are speaking Liberal. Try English. It works better.
 
We need federal gun legislation!!!!

Stop this racist “states” shit.

Some State legislators are too ignorant and racist to make decisions for their states let alone America.

Wonder how they even get elected????????????

FEDERAL GUN LAWS NOW!!!!

We already have one. The 2nd amendment of the Constitution of the United States.
 
Debunked Liberal Lie: "The 2nd Amendment only protects the right of the states to maintain militias, rather than the right of individuals to bear arms."

-Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution already provides for the existence of such militias. There would be no reason for the 2nd Amendment to exist if this were correct.

-When the Framers drafted the Bill of Rights, they went out of their way to specify “The People” when talking about the rights of the individual and “The States” when talking about the rights of state governments. For liberals to be correct on this, the 2nd Amendment (‘the right of The People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed’) would have to be the only place in the entire document in which the meanings were reversed.

-The term “well-regulated” in 1789 meant correctly-calibrated and properly formed. There is abundant evidence of this and it is beyond dispute. When the first part of the 2nd Amendment justifies gun rights by explaining, “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state…,” it is clarifying that you cannot have the kind of disciplined and well-trained citizen militias necessary to repel foreign invasions, put down unrest, and resist government tyranny without an armed populace. This was made unmistakably clear by Alexander Hamilton’s discussion of militias in Federalist 29, and by the original wording of the 2nd Amendment:

“The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; a well armed and well regulated militia being the best security of a free country.”

But liberals deliberately misrepresent the 2nd Amendment’s wording to argue that the Founders (who used armed revolution to overthrow the government) only actually supported the right of states to operate their own government-controlled militias, despite them being on the record emphatically stating the opposite. These would be the same Founding Fathers who made it a requirement that every citizen own a firearm at one point.

Liberals also cite examples of armed rebellions that were put down by George Washington as proof that our Founders never intended for us to be able to take up arms against federal tyranny. But this flies in the face of everything we know about the Founding Fathers, who talked routinely about refreshing the “tree of liberty” with the “blood of patriots and tyrants,” and who enthusiastically embraced such rights in no uncertain terms in the Declaration of Independence.

Yet again, like the rest of the Bill of Rights, the 2nd Amendment was drafted specifically to convince New York and Virginia that this new Federal Government we were creating would never be able to trample their Natural Right to self-rule as an armed, free people. The Founding Fathers had no illusions about the tyrannical inclinations of government, and they enshrined gun rights in the Constitution as a protection of the states and The People against the Federal Government for the clear and stated purpose of armed resistance to tyranny.

This is an undeniable fact that liberals simply choose to lie about non-stop…as with everything else they say about the Constitution. The 2nd Amendment provably bans all federal gun laws.

View attachment 12715

State laws too. The 2nd amendment is binding upon the States. In addition, most State constitutions have similar statements in them.
 
Back
Top