Trump preventing testimony from important witnesses.

Looks like Pompeo is advancing the dining rest-infested ship.

Pompeo has been privately telling Republicans he’s planning to resign.
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo is apparently seeking to resign from the Trump administration ahead of a potential run for the US Senate, three senior Republicans told Time magazine.

However, his reputation is in murky waters amid the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump. Pompeo was one of the first top officials in the Trump administration to be subpoenaed by House Democrats, but he eventually failed to comply with their deadline back in October.

The three Republicans include "one who served in the Trump Administration, another who remains in government, and a third who served in several high-ranking posts and is active in GOP politics," Time reported. They spoke to the magazine on the condition of anonymity to discuss their private conversations with Pompeo.

The three Republicans told the magazine that Pompeo was planning to stay on as secretary of state for the next year, but the impeachment inquiry could prompt an earlier exit.

Pompeo has been known to be a loyal ally to the president, so much so that he has been described as a "a heat-seeking missile for Trump's a--" in a New Yorker article. It is unclear if he has discussed his supposedly impending resignation with the president.
 
Hello Celticguy,

Celticguy said:
But not into everything.
Click to expand...

If the President wants investigations he can order the FBI or the Justice Department to conduct them as long as they are reasonably indicated. Heck. He can even have them conducted for no good reason at all, as he has already done. What he cannot do is condition military aid to Ukraine on them investigating his political rivals without just cause.
 
Celticguy said:
The obvious seems to have escaped your narrative.
why was Hunter Biden given a job he was unqualified for ? Daddy got it for him. Thats how extortion works.
Click to expand...


Not correct. Burisma offered an educated and experienced lobbyist to work for them. His having a father who was VP is a big bonus. However, none of it is a crime. Are you crazy enough to think Joe contacted Burisma and threatened them if they did not give his son a job? You sure need a lot of proof to make that statement. You have zero.
You do not know how extorsion works. Watch what Trump does if you need a primer.
 
Trump has blocked many people from testifying. As Sondland said, Trump will not allow him to have his notes and paperwork. Trump is doing all he can to block the hearings and is failing badly.
 
Nordberg said:
He is using a fallacy fallacy.
Click to expand...

Inversion Fallacy is something the world had to define after Donald Trump and Leg-Humping Trumpsters created them as a strategy for dealing with everything he is in fact guilty of himself.

In other words, when Donald Trump is guilty of something- he pre-emptively accuses one of his adversaries of it, thinking as if the world is too stupid to know he just uses it as a diversion method. When in fact we we all understand- IT IS JUST ANOTHER CONFEFE- I MEAN CONFESSION!

HEY! LOOKY! OVER THERE! JUST LOOK AT THOSE BASTARDS! LOCK THEM UP!
 
Last edited:
PoliTalker said:
Hello Celticguy,



If the President wants investigations he can order the FBI or the Justice Department to conduct them as long as they are reasonably indicated. Heck. He can even have them conducted for no good reason at all, as he has already done. What he cannot do is condition military aid to Ukraine on them investigating his political rivals without just cause.
Click to expand...

He didn't ask Ukraine to investigate any political rival. He didn't withhold anything.
 
Adolf_Twitler said:
Inversion Fallacy is something the world had to define after Donald Trump and Leg-Humping Trumpsters created them as a strategy for dealing with everything he is in fact guilty of himself.
Click to expand...
Inversion fallacies existed long before Trump, dumbass.
Adolf_Twitler said:
In other words, when Donald Trump is guilty of something- he pre-emptively accuses one of his adversaries of it, thinking as if the world is too stupid to know he just uses it as a diversion method. When in fact we we all understand-
Click to expand...
It is not possible to 'pre-emptively' accuse. What crime is Trump guilty of?
Adolf_Twitler said:
IT IS JUST ANOTHER CONFEFE- I MEAN CONFESSION!

HEY! LOOKY! OVER THERE! JUST LOOK AT THOSE BASTARDS! LOCK THEM UP!
Click to expand...

Inversion fallacy.
 
Nordberg said:
Not correct. Burisma offered an educated and experienced lobbyist to work for them. His having a father who was VP is a big bonus. However, none of it is a crime. Are you crazy enough to think Joe contacted Burisma and threatened them if they did not give his son a job? You sure need a lot of proof to make that statement. You have zero.
You do not know how extorsion works. Watch what Trump does if you need a primer.
Click to expand...

He didnt have to. That was the incentive to obtain his cooperation.
 
Into the Night said:
Inversion fallacies existed long before Trump, dumbass.

It is not possible to 'pre-emptively' accuse. What crime is Trump guilty of?


Inversion fallacy.
Click to expand...

Who let you outta' your cage?

LOCK HIM UP! LOL!

I believe Donald Trump's "CROOKED HILLARY! LOCK HER UP!" INVERSION FALLACY came first- long before DONNIE TRUMP'S IMPEACHMENT TRIAL!

Perhaps DONNIE BOY shouldn't start shit- if he can't handle it when it comes back on him!
 
Micawber said:
If he is referring to denying the antecedent then it's called inverse fallacy not inversion fallacy.
Click to expand...

[Insert Google search here] is not a compilation of, nor an authority over, logical fallacies. Learn how to form your own arguments...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top