Another impeachment show trial "witness" caught lying

Darth Omar said:
I read where some republican senators WANT this to go to trial because so far the poll numbers are helping Trump and republicans.

Plus, they’ll have access to the WB and Hunter Biden.
Click to expand...
Dems want to force senators to support this criminal in an election year. It's working.
 
Arminius said:
Fiona Hill falsely insisted that Republicans denied Russia's election meddling (what they denied is the left's ludicrous conspiracy theories about COLLUSION), and also falsely insisted that well-documented, proven Ukraine meddling was some kind of debunked conspiracy theory, despite all these court records and DEMOCRAT sources documenting how it all happened. The two things all these cherry-picked, coached, hilariously self-described "non-partisan" witnesses seem to have in common is that they didn't actually witness anything and that they straight up lied under oath.

Desperation, much? :laugh:

View attachment 12770
Click to expand...


trump will most certainly be impeached...get used to it
 
Althea said:
This has nothing to do with getting rid of trump. We NEED him in office next year if we want to finally get rid of his criminal enterprise.

This is about using the power of Congress to uncover evidence of his crimes.

It's working. Stay tuned...Stone was just the first domino.
Click to expand...
The Senate is going to use the power of Congress to uncover Biden and Son.
 
Earl said:
A declarative sentence is not a groan and President Trump will not be convicted.

A total waste of time.
Click to expand...


your drug use is confusing you. Like trump will not be found guilty in the senate. The value is getting trump to waste his time on impeachment and not do more stupid shit.
 
Arminius said:
Because that's what the evidence showed. And following facts, evidence, and logic (instead of emotional hysteria and conspiracy theories) tends to be a defining trait for thinking adults (everyone but Democrats). The only way they would doubt it is if the evidence hadn't come out yet by any remotely serious source. But their own investigations proved that Russians tried to support Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump, so obviously.
Click to expand...

My question goes to the state of mind of every repub, not what the evidence showed. I believe there are repubs who openly pay lip service to the official report but quietly believe otherwise.
 
Arminius said:
Yes, there could be no possible reason to investigate the most notoriously corrupt company in the country coming under investigation and then deciding to start paying Biden's completely unqualified son $50k per month to to literally nothing for them while Biden oversaw U.S.-Ukraine policy.

Nothing to see here. Move along. :rofl2:

Who spoon-feeds you these idiot talking points? Ever consider thinking for yourself? :laugh:
Click to expand...

Who decided to award trump's completely unqualified daughter a bunch of trademarks in order to get an "in" to her father? That would be the corrupt Chinese, hotshot.

Who decided to award trump's completely unqualified daughter and son-in-law high level positions in his administration? That would be her corrupt daddy.

Who decided to pay the grifter-in-chief millions of dollars so they could slap his name on their buildings or products around the world? That would be these people.

Who decided to start a fake university with the goal of fleecing suckers out of their hard-earned money? That would be your unqualified "professor" lol.

If I were a repub I'd steer clear of attacking HB for his business deal when there's so much ammo out there to attack the grifter for his deals. But if that's what they want to do, then they better prepare for the blowback.
 
Arminius said:
Wrong. The problem is that Democrats presume they can commit blatant felonies and are somehow shielded by the fact that facing any consequences whatsoever requires being investigated by their rivals. You don't get to hide behind that. Just don't be a corrupt, cheating scumbag in the first place.
Click to expand...

Where's the felony in doing what HB did? You should be criticizing the Burisma people for being so eager to part with their money. What he did is no different from what trump's been doing for decades.

And the "evidence" against Manafort, manufactured by Ukraine, was ALWAYS incredibly shady and unverified...
Click to expand...

:rofl2: :rofl2: Even a die-hard trump fluffer like you can't be that naive.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top