Andrew Nepolitano would vote to impeach Trump

F

floridafan

Verified User
Fox News senior judicial analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano revealed on Wednesday that he would vote to impeach President Donald Trump if he were a member of the House of Representatives.

“You believe the president has committed impeachable offenses?” Fox News host Bill Hemmer asked Napolitano minutes before a House impeachment hearing.

“I believe that the Democrats have credibly argued that he committed impeachable offenses,” Napolitano explained. “The easiest one — it exists in Andrew Johnson, Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton — was obstruction of Congress.”

“By directing his subordinates to refuse to comply with lawfully issued subpoenas,” he continued, “whether it’s for testimony or for documents, that’s an impeachable offense. We know that from history. Every time the House has looked at that with respect to the president, they have found that to be impeachable.”

“On that, reasonable minds cannot disagree,” Napolitano added, “without rejecting history and without rejecting constitutional norms.”
“If you were in the House, would you vote for impeachment?” Hemmer wondered.

“I certainly would,” Napolitano replied. “I would on that count.”

Watch the video below from Fox News.
 
He might be right. But given the political climate(visceral hatred). This stopped being about right and wrong about 3 hours after Trump won the election. IMO, it's about revenge mostly(for Bill's impeachment, not HRC's loss). The vote is gonna be right down the party line regardless. At this point, Trump could shoot someone in the middle of 5th ave, and the vote would be right down the party line. It's a statement, that's all. Just a little friendly "fuck you, shifty" from the GOP. Gonna be the same in the senate
 
floridafan said:
Fox News senior judicial analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano revealed on Wednesday that he would vote to impeach President Donald Trump if he were a member of the House of Representatives.

“You believe the president has committed impeachable offenses?” Fox News host Bill Hemmer asked Napolitano minutes before a House impeachment hearing.

“I believe that the Democrats have credibly argued that he committed impeachable offenses,” Napolitano explained. “The easiest one — it exists in Andrew Johnson, Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton — was obstruction of Congress.”

“By directing his subordinates to refuse to comply with lawfully issued subpoenas,” he continued, “whether it’s for testimony or for documents, that’s an impeachable offense. We know that from history. Every time the House has looked at that with respect to the president, they have found that to be impeachable.”

“On that, reasonable minds cannot disagree,” Napolitano added, “without rejecting history and without rejecting constitutional norms.”
“If you were in the House, would you vote for impeachment?” Hemmer wondered.

“I certainly would,” Napolitano replied. “I would on that count.”

Watch the video below from Fox News.
Click to expand...

All sober, rational adults would vote to remove him.
 
Callinectes Ocasio-Cortez said:
He might be right. But given the political climate(visceral hatred). This stopped being about right and wrong about 3 hours after Trump won the election. IMO, it's about revenge mostly(for Bill's impeachment, not HRC's loss). The vote is gonna be right down the party line regardless. At this point, Trump could shoot someone in the middle of 5th ave, and the vote would be right down the party line. It's a statement, that's all. Just a little friendly "fuck you, shifty" from the GOP. Gonna be the same in the senate
Click to expand...

Yes, but let's not forget, given the overwhelming evidence of corruption and criminality on twump's part and on the part of his entire administration, your opinion is, yet again, dogshit.
 
floridafan said:
Fox News senior judicial analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano revealed on Wednesday that he would vote to impeach President Donald Trump if he were a member of the House of Representatives.

“You believe the president has committed impeachable offenses?” Fox News host Bill Hemmer asked Napolitano minutes before a House impeachment hearing.

“I believe that the Democrats have credibly argued that he committed impeachable offenses,” Napolitano explained. “The easiest one — it exists in Andrew Johnson, Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton — was obstruction of Congress.”

“By directing his subordinates to refuse to comply with lawfully issued subpoenas,” he continued, “whether it’s for testimony or for documents, that’s an impeachable offense. We know that from history. Every time the House has looked at that with respect to the president, they have found that to be impeachable.”

“On that, reasonable minds cannot disagree,” Napolitano added, “without rejecting history and without rejecting constitutional norms.”
“If you were in the House, would you vote for impeachment?” Hemmer wondered.

“I certainly would,” Napolitano replied. “I would on that count.”

Watch the video below from Fox News.
Click to expand...

NOT voting FOR impeachment on this Offense ... is turning the President into a King (or Dictator).
 
floridafan said:
Fox News senior judicial analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano revealed on Wednesday that he would vote to impeach President Donald Trump if he were a member of the House of Representatives.

“You believe the president has committed impeachable offenses?” Fox News host Bill Hemmer asked Napolitano minutes before a House impeachment hearing.

“I believe that the Democrats have credibly argued that he committed impeachable offenses,” Napolitano explained. “The easiest one — it exists in Andrew Johnson, Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton — was obstruction of Congress.”

“By directing his subordinates to refuse to comply with lawfully issued subpoenas,” he continued, “whether it’s for testimony or for documents, that’s an impeachable offense. We know that from history. Every time the House has looked at that with respect to the president, they have found that to be impeachable.”

“On that, reasonable minds cannot disagree,” Napolitano added, “without rejecting history and without rejecting constitutional norms.”
“If you were in the House, would you vote for impeachment?” Hemmer wondered.

“I certainly would,” Napolitano replied. “I would on that count.”

Watch the video below from Fox News.
Click to expand...


Yeah..HE's A NEVER-TRUMPER..ALWAYS HAS BEEN.


HE ALSO CLAIMED THAT THE MUELLER PROBE WOULD FIND "COLLUSION."


WRONG AGAIN.....
 
Grokmaster said:
Yeah..HE's A NEVER-TRUMPER..ALWAYS HAS BEEN.


HE ALSO CLAIMED THAT THE MUELLER PROBE WOULD FIND "COLLUSION."




WRONG AGAIN.....
Click to expand...

You are a fucking liar, as usual. Anyone who has even the slightest bone to pick with trump become a never trumper. No one is ever allowed to criticize the emperor.
 
Grok goes straight to labelling and insulting a guy he was extremely happy with in the past. Napolitano was a Fox talking head for years providing "legal info" to back the right. Now he is a hater and no longer pure enough. The judge is simply telling the law and how it pertains to Trump. If it were helping Trump, Grok would be calling him a legal genius. He is not, so he is a left-wing Trump-hating hack. Rigtyts have such a simple and obvious play book.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top