Andrew Nepolitano would vote to impeach Trump

floridafan said:
Fox News senior judicial analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano revealed on Wednesday that he would vote to impeach President Donald Trump if he were a member of the House of Representatives.

“You believe the president has committed impeachable offenses?” Fox News host Bill Hemmer asked Napolitano minutes before a House impeachment hearing.

“I believe that the Democrats have credibly argued that he committed impeachable offenses,” Napolitano explained. “The easiest one — it exists in Andrew Johnson, Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton — was obstruction of Congress.”

“By directing his subordinates to refuse to comply with lawfully issued subpoenas,” he continued, “whether it’s for testimony or for documents, that’s an impeachable offense. We know that from history. Every time the House has looked at that with respect to the president, they have found that to be impeachable.”

“On that, reasonable minds cannot disagree,” Napolitano added, “without rejecting history and without rejecting constitutional norms.”
“If you were in the House, would you vote for impeachment?” Hemmer wondered.

“I certainly would,” Napolitano replied. “I would on that count.”

Watch the video below from Fox News.
Click to expand...

Since he's not, that's about at meaningful as one of you left winger claiming you care about the poor then going about finding ways for someone else to provide for them instead of doing it yourself.
 
CFM said:
Since he's not, that's about at meaningful as one of you left winger claiming you care about the poor then going about finding ways for someone else to provide for them instead of doing it yourself.
Click to expand...

Here we have a man who is an attorney, former superior court judge and author who has far more grasp and knowledge of these crimes than you can ever have. Is Trump ever wrong about anything, or must you continue to defend him no matter how serious of a crime he commits.
 
floridafan said:
Here we have a man who is an attorney, former superior court judge and author who has far more grasp and knowledge of these crimes than you can ever have. Is Trump ever wrong about anything, or must you continue to defend him no matter how serious of a crime he commits.
Click to expand...

What we have is someone that made a meaningless IF claim and you act as if it's anything but that.

He hasn't committed any crimes. The only thing he did to motivate your kind is to kick your sorry asses in 2016.
 
CFM said:
What we have is someone that made a meaningless IF claim and you act as if it's anything but that.

He hasn't committed any crimes. The only thing he did to motivate your kind is to kick your sorry asses in 2016.
Click to expand...

He has committed many crimes. Just the fact that he will not allow his people to testify after receiving a congressional subpoena is a crime in itself.
 
floridafan said:
He has committed many crimes. Just the fact that he will not allow his people to testify after receiving a congressional subpoena is a crime in itself.
Click to expand...

The only "crime" he committed was kicking your left wing ass in 2016. You've done nothing but cry since then because you know a white MAN has been able to do what the black BOY never could.
 
floridafan said:
A person who receives a congressional subpoena MUST testify. Then if anything may involve executive privilege, they can refuse to answer a question. However, they must testify!
Click to expand...

You mean like Brian Pagliano did when when served a subpoena in the Hillary email investigation?
 
floridafan said:
Here we have a man who is an attorney, former superior court judge and author who has far more grasp and knowledge of these crimes than you can ever have. Is Trump ever wrong about anything, or must you continue to defend him no matter how serious of a crime he commits.
Click to expand...

he's a fucking establishment shill blowhard.
 
Southern Chicken said:
He hasn't committed any crimes. Executive privilege isn't a crime.
Click to expand...

So now asking a foreign nation to help you in your reelection is covered under Executive Privilege? Abuse of power is covered under Executive Privilage?

You people got to start turning off Sean and read, primary sources would be a good start
 
CFM said:
You mean like Brian Pagliano did when when served a subpoena in the Hillary email investigation?
Click to expand...

Yes, exactly. Mr. Pagliano was held in contempt of Congress, just as those who refuse to testify in this administration, as well as the man who directed them not to testify. Thanks for helping us out, and clarifying the matter.
 
floridafan said:
Yes, exactly. Mr. Pagliano was held in contempt of Congress, just as those who refuse to testify in this administration, as well as the man who directed them not to testify. Thanks for helping us out, and clarifying the matter.
Click to expand...

Did Pagliano testify?
 
I don't thinks so, but he was ready to.
You were kind enough to show us all why not testifying , and not obeying a subpoena is not an option. That is why Mr. trump will be charged with contempt of Congress.
 
floridafan said:
Fox News senior judicial analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano revealed on Wednesday that he would vote to impeach President Donald Trump if he were a member of the House of Representatives.

“You believe the president has committed impeachable offenses?” Fox News host Bill Hemmer asked Napolitano minutes before a House impeachment hearing.

“I believe that the Democrats have credibly argued that he committed impeachable offenses,” Napolitano explained. “The easiest one — it exists in Andrew Johnson, Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton — was obstruction of Congress.”

“By directing his subordinates to refuse to comply with lawfully issued subpoenas,” he continued, “whether it’s for testimony or for documents, that’s an impeachable offense. We know that from history. Every time the House has looked at that with respect to the president, they have found that to be impeachable.”

“On that, reasonable minds cannot disagree,” Napolitano added, “without rejecting history and without rejecting constitutional norms.”
“If you were in the House, would you vote for impeachment?” Hemmer wondered.

“I certainly would,” Napolitano replied. “I would on that count.”

Watch the video below from Fox News.
Click to expand...

Nepolitano is a throwback to Conservatives who were more loyal to America than to the Republican party.
 
archives said:
So now asking a foreign nation to help you in your reelection is covered under Executive Privilege? Abuse of power is covered under Executive Privilage?

You people got to start turning off Sean and read, primary sources would be a good start
Click to expand...

"*Just the fact that he will not allow his people to testify after receiving a congressional subpoena is a crime in itself."

Is what we were speaking on. Please feel free to join OUR conversation.
 
Southern Chicken said:
"*Just the fact that he will not allow his people to testify after receiving a congressional subpoena is a crime in itself."

Is what we were speaking on. Please feel free to join OUR conversation.
Click to expand...

How is it not obstruction? How does Executive Privilage cover everyone who ever worked at any time in the White House? Any member of the Cabinet or a Cabinet member's staff past or present? Any and all documents which normally would be open for public review? Actions of the President before he was even elected President?

Your understanding of Executive Privilage is actually Executive absolutism, one of the very things the Founding Fathers warned us against
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top