The Democrats witness dilemma

My Senators didn't make up things. You did.

How funny to see you back down when expected to man up. No wonder your kind are considered niggers.

Your Senators have a say in witnesses so ask them. The same witnesses that got your honey pot all wet when you guaranteed they wouldn't be called.
 
When it comes to key witnesses like the so called whistleblower, Democrats suddenly oppose that POS being called.
He was the catalyst for the entire scam.

If witnesses are called, he will be called. The Biden crime family too.
 
The Republican Senate would most assuredly, with a simple majority vote, prevent any attempt to limit witnesses.

The Democrats appear to believe that only their witnesses, if any are even called, should be called.

Oh, Hell no.

If the Senate votes to allow witnesses it will just encourage similar behavior from future Houses.

I advocate allowing no witnesses and voting on the articles as they *were voted on by the House*. This would discourage future Houses from sending half-baked articles of impeachment to be tried by the Senate.

IOW, the sanctity of the impeachment process is at stake. If they vote to allow witnesses, the next impeachment won’t be 20-30 years from now—and you can take that to the bank.
 
If the Senate votes to allow witnesses it will just encourage similar behavior from future Houses.

I advocate allowing no witnesses and voting on the articles as they *were voted on by the House*. This would discourage future Houses from sending half-baked articles of impeachment to be tried by the Senate.

IOW, the sanctity of the impeachment process is at stake. If they vote to allow witnesses, the next impeachment won’t be 20-30 years from now—and you can take that to the bank.

Indeed.

Never ending, changing Articles are not what the Founding Fathers envisioned.

The Senate will act to preserve the Constitutional limits of endless impeachment.

The electorate, except the howling fanatics on the left, are bone weary of this abomination.
 
I’m pretty sure it’s entirely up to the Senate whether any witnesses are called.

Yes...and I did not dispute that with what I wrote.

But if witnesses are called, Roberts may very well exercise the power to allow or disallow...with the Senate then able to over-rule him.

If Roberts is going to disallow the Biden or the WB—he has to justify his reasoning. Or more likely he would want to hear arguments for and against it. Or if he wants to disallow them on sheer fiat—that gives every republican a good reason to vote for acquittal.

The disgusting, cowardly Republican senators do not need a good reason to vote for acquittal. They are perfectly happy to do it just to satisfy The Leader.

I just wrote several paragraphs in favor of hearing from them. It’s pretty much a slam dunk, actually. Which takes us back to the OP point and the ‘witness dilemma’ for Democrats.

There is no witness dilemma for the Democrats, Darth.

That is a fiction Trump supporters are peddling. They also are the only ones buying it.
 
Indeed.

Never ending, changing Articles are not what the Founding Fathers envisioned.

The Senate will act to preserve the Constitutional limits of endless impeachment.

The electorate, except the howling fanatics on the left, are bone weary of this abomination.

What do you know of how the electorate feels, I do know that desperation has set in and you will do anything and everything possible to keep witnesses from testifying. Now if Trump was truly innocent you would love to have witnesses testify in his behalf.
 
Its just getting started my dear, and everything you predicted so far has been wrong. At least you are consistent.

whatever you say floridanut, whatever you say.

sooner or later it will sink in, but I suppose when your head is as big as yours is it might take some time

end game, you can almost see Democrat votes being sucked out of the system as this charade plays on and on and on

please continue :rofl2:
 
What do you know of how the electorate feels, I do know that desperation has set in and you will do anything and everything possible to keep witnesses from testifying. Now if Trump was truly innocent you would love to have witnesses testify in his behalf.
Executive Privilege will be preserved whether you like it or not and the results of this sham impeachment which was started by the sulking Democrats in Nov., 2016, were well known, and will be the total exoneration of the president and political retribution of Biblical proportions in Nov., 2020.
 
whatever you say floridanut, whatever you say.

sooner or later it will sink in, but I suppose when your head is as big as yours is it might take some time

end game, you can almost see Democrat votes being sucked out of the system as this charade plays on and on and on

please continue :rofl2:

You are the pathetic moro who said there would never be witnesses allowed. As it is more and more Senators want there to be witnesses.
 
Yes...and I did not dispute that with what I wrote.

But if witnesses are called, Roberts may very well exercise the power to allow or disallow...with the Senate then able to over-rule him.



The disgusting, cowardly Republican senators do not need a good reason to vote for acquittal. They are perfectly happy to do it just to satisfy The Leader.



There is no witness dilemma for the Democrats, Darth.

That is a fiction Trump supporters are peddling. They also are the only ones buying it.

Then why are democrats balking at it lol?

If they had nothing to fear from putting Biden/WB/Schiff under oath, the proper response would be ‘fine, whatever, let’s just do this’ but they are making noise about it instead.

What’s your rationalization for that, Frank?
 
It's there. The President runs foreign policy. Period. It starts and stops there. There is nothing saying he must dole out our money. You should try to be more informed

From now to the day Trump is convicted by the Senate you may continue to live in your own dream world of fantasy and lies. It don't mean sht to anyone.
 
The predictions by most of the Conservatives on this forum are accurate.

Impeachment in the House and total exoneration in the Senate and Nov, 2020..
 
Then why are democrats balking at it lol?

If they had nothing to fear from putting Biden/WB/Schiff under oath, the proper response would be ‘fine, whatever, let’s just do this’ but they are making noise about it instead.

What’s your rationalization for that, Frank?

oh we're going to hear from the Bidens, and Schiff, and the whistleblower, that you can bet the ranch on :wink:
 
Back
Top