JPP lefties: please read and assimilate this

In theory, we are all libertarians- BUT WE ONLY HAVE TWO PARTIES TO VOTE FOR AND WE HAVE TO TAKE THE LESSER OF TWO EVILS.

We are all liberals, just one party likes to think they aren't just because they are WHITE and Superior to everyone.

And, we are all Conservatives, but the Democrats personally do not like people who lie and cheat, use racism, use conspiracy theories, what-aboutisms, Rhetoric, Insults, FAKE NEWS, and self-centered self-interest people or those that run with them, so they call themselves liberals to differentiate themselves.

I'm certainly not a Libertarian... LMFAO.

But, I do agree with the 2 Party system being pathetic.

PS.
What evidence do you have for racial equality?
 
I'm certainly not a Libertarian... LMFAO.

But, I do agree with the 2 Party system being pathetic.

PS.
What evidence do you have for racial equality?

That shows up in the way the Republicans try to suppress the vote- their love of the Delegate System- their love of Gerrymandering etc.
 
Everyone in my family, was & or is against Pornography, Illegal Immigrants, Abortion, Outsourced jobs,Hollywood smut, raunchy & shoot up films, or Gangster rap music, and also support some gun control.

So you've shown your dog porn, and he said *yawn*? :laugh:

I suppose it would be unkind to point out that you sound like an uptight 8th-grader, so I won't.
 
Pure Capitalism, would be selling illicit drugs legally, fully privatized abortion, Illegals hired in mass, Outsourced jobs in mass, Pornography, Hollywood smut, raunchy & shoot 'em up films with Liberal biases, Media with Liberal biases, Facebook with Liberals biases, Gay Bars & Strip clubs.

None of this is compatible with Nationalism or Theocracy.

#stupid
 
In theory, we are all libertarians- BUT WE ONLY HAVE TWO PARTIES TO VOTE FOR AND WE HAVE TO TAKE THE LESSER OF TWO EVILS.

We are all liberals, just one party likes to think they aren't just because they are WHITE and Superior to everyone.

And, we are all Conservatives, but the Democrats personally do not like people who lie and cheat, use racism, use conspiracy theories, what-aboutisms, Rhetoric, Insults, FAKE NEWS, and self-centered self-interest people or those that run with them, so they call themselves liberals to differentiate themselves.

#reallystupid :rolleyes:
 
Doctor Birx is on record saying hospitals have been instructed to included death *with* COVID in with the Death *by* COVID numbers. They don’t do this with the seasonal flu—and if they did, we’d be setting record flu seasons.
They don't do it at all with flu. If we relied on the death certificates for flu numbers they would be precisely ZERO every year. Instead we count them in various other ways including doing a statistical estimate. The Covid death count is much more accurate than any flu death count ever was or is.
It seems like the experts are doing everything they can to keep the case mortality rate as high as possible. I’m not suggesting a conspiracy but if there was that’s EXACTLY what would be going on.
So, you would be fine with only counting the number of deaths above the average for the last 3 years as Covid 19 deaths?

And when WHO was reporting a 3.4% CFR why weren’t our tax paid experts saying ‘whoa, slow down, we can’t make that claim yet’.
CFR is based on deaths/cases. One need only count known deaths and known infections to get CFR. No one is claiming CFR is the true number of deaths or infections. It is what we know at the current time. It is always subject to change as long as infected people are identified and infected people die.
Why didn’t they do that? Why didn’t they say the CFR used to come up with 2 million deaths was most likely wrong?
You go with the information you have. You don't say, "I don't like the data so I will just make up data I do like." All estimates have levels of uncertainty attached to them. 2 million deaths was on the high end of the early estimates.
 
Last edited:
They don't do it at all with flu. If we relied on the death certificates for flu numbers they would be precisely ZERO every year. Instead we count them in various other ways including doing a statistical estimate. The Covid death count is much more accurate than any flu death count ever was or is.
So, you would be fine with only counting the number of deaths above the average for the last 3 years as Covid 19 deaths?

CFR is based on deaths/cases. One need only count known deaths and known infections to get CFR. No one is claiming CFR is the true number of deaths or infections. It is what we know at the current time. It is always subject to change as long as infected people are identified and infected people die.
You go with the information you have. You don't say, "I don't like the data so I will just make up data I do like." All estimates have levels of uncertainty attached to them. 2 million deaths was on the high end of the early estimates.

Why not?

tenor.gif


stupid_meter.gif
 
You fucking moron; why do you think that I used .01? It's 1% dumbass. :rolleyes:
You might want to actually read the article I was commenting on, poopiehead.

It says THIS:
we get at least 990,000 infections in the U.S. The number of cases reported on March 19 in the U.S. was 13,677, more than 72-fold lower. These numbers imply a fatality rate from Covid-19 orders of magnitude smaller than it appears….If our surmise of six million cases is accurate, that’s a mortality rate of 0.01%, assuming a two week lag between infection and death. This is one-tenth of the flu mortality rate of 0.1%.
You can go read it for yourself here:
https://mises.org/wire/experts-have-no-idea-how-many-covid-19-cases-there-are

This is why I don't like arguing with morons. You have to educate them just to get started.
You should really start by teaching yourself how to read, poopiehead. I posted the quote from the article when I made my first comment on it. It pretty clearly says .01% although when it's not in large red letters then you actually have to have some reading comprehension skills.
 
You might want to actually read the article I was commenting on, poopiehead.

It says THIS:

You can go read it for yourself here:
https://mises.org/wire/experts-have-no-idea-how-many-covid-19-cases-there-are

You should really start by teaching yourself how to read, poopiehead. I posted the quote from the article when I made my first comment on it. It pretty clearly says .01% although when it's not in large red letters then you actually have to have some reading comprehension skills.

#stuckonstupid
 
Back
Top