Dems still lying, wildly wrong COVID projections took social distancing into account

archives said:
Bullshit, more right wing conspiracies to explain why things aren't going their Messiah's way, you do know for every brietfart type "proof" you can produce there are also arguments claiming the the real numbers aren't being recorded properly and the numbers are all low balled
Click to expand...

Well, people with a brain begin to wonder when the US has 12 times the cases and deaths and the epicenter of this whole mess hasn't changed in over a month. Dumbfucks like you? They just parrot the bullshit they are fed like gullible lemmings.
 
Concart said:
Why not agree 1 billion percent, since you are just making stuff up? Go big or go home. Anyone who says they 'know' the figures were inflated without a shred of evidence is ignorant.
Click to expand...

Actually, all we need to know is the CFR percentage that got plugged into the models.

Compare that to the *real* data based CFR derived from serum antibody tests and—bingo—there’s evidence that the numbers were inflated.

Will you own it? Will anyone own it? Or will it be an ‘oopsie’?
 
Darth Omar said:
Actually, all we need to know is the CFR percentage that got plugged into the models.

Compare that to the *real* data based CFR derived from serum antibody tests and—bingo—there’s evidence that the numbers were inflated.

Will you own it? Will anyone own it? Or will it be an ‘oopsie’?
Click to expand...

Did you see the good news? Seems that 25% of people tested for antibodies in the 5 NY boroughs
had Wufu and recovered. Most never even knew they had it. Recovery rate keeps rising.
The more antibody tests we have, the more it proves the disease truly did its worst on the elderly
and pre-conditioned. Bring on the antibody tests! Bring those numbers up some more!
The Dems won't be getting their death wish on our country.

Open up America!!!!! LOL :usflag:
 
Stretch said:
Did you see the good news? Seems that 25% of people tested for antibodies in the 5 NY boroughs
had Wufu and recovered. Most never even knew they had it. Recovery rate keeps rising.
The more antibody tests we have, the more it proves the disease truly did its worst on the elderly
and pre-conditioned. Bring on the antibody tests! Bring those numbers up some more!
The Dems won't be getting their death wish on our country.

Open up America!!!!! LOL :usflag:
Click to expand...

There’s sufficient data to open up—it’s a big reason there’s movement in that direction. All of the antibody tests point in the same direction—towards a low COVID CFR.

All of them show that a much higher number of individuals *have had* COVID than were tested positive for COVID. I was harping on antibody tests before they were a ‘thing’ lol. Because it all comes down to mortality rate.

If COVID has a low mortality rate the case numbers aren’t as alarming. When people get it in their heads they have a 5% chance of dying if they get the WuFlu they are going to be afraid.

And there’s not two or three ways to get to an *accurate* CFR—there’s only one way: you *must* have a solid estimate of the number of individuals in the population that *have had* the disease. Not just the ones who got sick enough to be admitted to the hospital.

Everyone, who has had it.

I’ve been optimistic about a low COVID CFR every since it came out there was an unusually high number of asymptomatic carriers.

Sure ‘nuff lol.
 
Darth Omar said:
What do you suppose Hillary would have said lol?

Sorry folks, we got sucked-in by some bogus model projections. Wait till you see these climate models we got for you though.

They are banging! Lol
Click to expand...

You guys still falling back on Hillary, eh?

Noticed that you didn't address Trump & his claim of 2 million+. How does that fit your narrative?
 
Darth Omar said:
I don’t do narratives lol.

What do you think my narrative is?

And do you mean to imply the models sucked?
Click to expand...

I don't put nearly as much on the models as you do. I believe they did the right thing to err on the side of caution.

Remember that pesky little "novel" in front of "coronavirus?" That's important.

And you most certainly "do" narratives. Though yours has been shifting pretty much every day.
 
Darth Omar said:
There’s sufficient data to open up—it’s a big reason there’s movement in that direction. All of the antibody tests point in the same direction—towards a low COVID CFR.

All of them show that a much higher number of individuals *have had* COVID than were tested positive for COVID. I was harping on antibody tests before they were a ‘thing’ lol. Because it all comes down to mortality rate.

If COVID has a low mortality rate the case numbers aren’t as alarming. When people get it in their heads they have a 5% chance of dying if they get the WuFlu they are going to be afraid.

And there’s not two or three ways to get to an *accurate* CFR—there’s only one way: you *must* have a solid estimate of the number of individuals in the population that *have had* the disease. Not just the ones who got sick enough to be admitted to the hospital.

Everyone, who has had it.

I’ve been optimistic about a low COVID CFR every since it came out there was an unusually high number of asymptomatic carriers.

Sure ‘nuff lol.
Click to expand...

:good4u:
 
BartenderElite said:
I don't put nearly as much on the models as you do. I believe they did the right thing to err on the side of caution.

Remember that pesky little "novel" in front of "coronavirus?" That's important.

And you most certainly "do" narratives. Though yours has been shifting pretty much every day.
Click to expand...

You don’t put stake in the models only because they turned out wrong lol.

You were told the word ‘novel’ makes COVID more scary. What makes the WuFlu scary/not scary is it’s mortality rate.

And, finally, we are beginning to learn about it.
 
x1pldwhdvgv41.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top