Unemployment Rate Could Rival Great Depression’s

Yup. You are making the usual cop-out. You have no further arguments, so you attack without one.
This is akin to discussing the greatness of Wayne Gretzky with someone who has never seen a hockey game.
While hockey is part of the economy (normally), and Wayne is a great player, it is not the economy itself. Strawman fallacy.
It isn't possible, so I won't bother to try.
Assumption of victory fallacy.
You don't know what a multiplier is,
Multiplier: a buzzword used in government and some businesses to justify socialistic programs.
Multiplication: a binomial operator denoting repetitive addition found in the Real, Full Discrete, and Fractional math Domains.
Multiplicand: one value found on the 'left' side of a multiplication.
Product: the result of a multiplication.
and you don't understand the velocity of money.
Money velocity is the rate of money moving between transactions. Note: magick multipliers do not increase money velocity. Money velocity is not wealth.
I can't discuss economics with a caveman,
You can't discuss economics with anyone, it seems.
and it would be stupid to try.
I agree.
 
Yup. You are making the usual cop-out. You have no further arguments, so you attack without one.

While hockey is part of the economy (normally), and Wayne is a great player, it is not the economy itself. Strawman fallacy.

Assumption of victory fallacy.

Multiplier: a buzzword used in government and some businesses to justify socialistic programs.
Multiplication: a binomial operator denoting repetitive addition found in the Real, Full Discrete, and Fractional math Domains.
Multiplicand: one value found on the 'left' side of a multiplication.
Product: the result of a multiplication.

Money velocity is the rate of money moving between transactions. Note: magick multipliers do not increase money velocity. Money velocity is not wealth.

You can't discuss economics with anyone, it seems.

I agree.

Thanks for confirming my belief.
 
^Doesn't think he is a Neanderthal. Also thinks he knows economics. :laugh: #retard

I do. I had the benefit of both my father and my elder brother being CPA's, and my father being one of the foremost tax accountants in the nation.

I also subscribe to the Austrian economic philosophy, not the Keynesian one. It is not possible for a government to buy its way out of financial failure, even if it can print its own money.
I know what money is, why it is what it is, and why people have faith in it. I know the history of where the concept of money first began and why.
I understand both capitalism and socialism, and have listened to both arguments for a very long time now.
I am also an expert in the fields of logic, a closed system much like mathematics. I know the history of both, where they come from, and why they take the forms they do.
I am also fully aware of what philosophy really is about (as opposed to how most universities teach it, or fail to teach it), and what requirements it places on the one making the philosophical argument. I know what power philosophy has in it's ability to define key words such as 'religion', 'science', 'real', 'time', 'infinity', etc.
I am a business owner. I built it from nothing but my own initiative and drive. I produce sensors and control systems for industrial, medical, and aerospace markets.
I am a chemist, computer designer, computer programmer, aircraft designer, pilot, and mechanic (specializing in avionics, composite structures, wood structures, and electrical power systems), pyrotechnician, musician, radio engineer (holding both amateur and commercial licenses with code and radar endorsements), visited every State in the Union, the SOTC, Mexico, Canada, and Japan. I also study eytomology, languages, and the culture behind them (including Japanese and Hawaiian), and of course, history including the history of technology, the history of theories of science including physics.

Just tootin' my own horn here. :D

Of course, no claim to any credential or accomplishments means anything on blind forums such as this one. Only the arguments themselves matter.
 
No I don't.
Lie. You advocate bit government and socialism.
But it wouldn't matter.
It does matter. Socialism is unconstitutional. The government needs to return to the constitution that created and defined it.
Facts exist outside of your distorted partisan view.
Learn what 'fact' means. It does not mean 'proof' or 'Universal Truth'. Until you figure this word out, avoid using it.
Your definition of 'too much' is 'more than they take in'.
Nope. The definition of 'too much' is 'too much', in other words, 'larger than it should be'. Apparently English is not your first language. Perhaps you are speaking Liberal.
So when they take in enough to cover expenditures, they don't spend too much now, do they?
They spend too much regardless of how much they tax, print, or borrow money.
You sure do struggle with really basic concepts.
Inversion fallacy. That would be you.
 
Polls are meaningless. Quoting secret polls even more so.

Are you effing kidding? A presidents internal polling, the RNC or DNC internal poling are the gold standard of polls. People pay big dollars for these polls.
However, just give us one good poll favoring trump and you will be in heaven.
 
Are you effing kidding? A presidents internal polling, the RNC or DNC internal poling are the gold standard of polls. People pay big dollars for these polls.
However, just give us one good poll favoring trump and you will be in heaven.

Polls? :palm: #retarded
 
Are you effing kidding? A presidents internal polling, the RNC or DNC internal poling are the gold standard of polls. People pay big dollars for these polls.
However, just give us one good poll favoring trump and you will be in heaven.

Math error: Failure to disclose raw data. Failure to disclose questions. Failure to disclose bias mitigation method. Failure to disclose and justify source of variance. Failure to select by randN. Failure to normalize by paired randU. Failure to calculate margin of error.

I don't care how much people pay for a poll. Strawman fallacy.
I don't have to declare any poll. Attempted force of negative proof fallacy.

You should probably at least go learn something about statistical math.
 
Math error: Failure to disclose raw data. Failure to disclose questions. Failure to disclose bias mitigation method. Failure to disclose and justify source of variance. Failure to select by randN. Failure to normalize by paired randU. Failure to calculate margin of error.

I don't care how much people pay for a poll. Strawman fallacy.
I don't have to declare any poll. Attempted force of negative proof fallacy.

You should probably at least go learn something about statistical math.

Just when I begin to think that you cannot be any more FOS than you are already, you prove me wrong, time and again
 
The recovery time from the unemployment rate will be a "mite" quicker than the Great Depression though. The left appears to be trying to slow down re-opening the economy, it sure seems it is because they believe that huge unemployment will help them in the election...
 
The recovery time from the unemployment rate will be a "mite" quicker than the Great Depression though.
A lot quicker. Agreed. The slowdown isn't nearly as long as the Great Depression and its effects either, which ran from 1929-1955.
The left appears to be trying to slow down re-opening the economy,
Dead right. That's exactly what they are trying to do. The fear mongering by them is unending. It's all they have.
it sure seems it is because they believe that huge unemployment will help them in the election..
Dead right again. The rhetoric that Trump somehow caused the virus or the economic slowdown or that it will be permanent is strong indeed from the Democrats.
 
Back
Top