Misquote. The numbers for 2019-2020 season have not yet been compiled. See the website you quoted.
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/preliminary-in-season-estimates.htm
Misquote. The numbers for 2019-2020 season have not yet been compiled. See the website you quoted.
Perhaps. I simply was going to leave it as a possible typo.
Yup. You are making the usual cop-out. You have no further arguments, so you attack without one.Nope.
While hockey is part of the economy (normally), and Wayne is a great player, it is not the economy itself. Strawman fallacy.This is akin to discussing the greatness of Wayne Gretzky with someone who has never seen a hockey game.
Assumption of victory fallacy.It isn't possible, so I won't bother to try.
Multiplier: a buzzword used in government and some businesses to justify socialistic programs.You don't know what a multiplier is,
Money velocity is the rate of money moving between transactions. Note: magick multipliers do not increase money velocity. Money velocity is not wealth.and you don't understand the velocity of money.
You can't discuss economics with anyone, it seems.I can't discuss economics with a caveman,
I agree.and it would be stupid to try.
Thanks for admitting that I was right. Well done.
Yup. You are making the usual cop-out. You have no further arguments, so you attack without one.
While hockey is part of the economy (normally), and Wayne is a great player, it is not the economy itself. Strawman fallacy.
Assumption of victory fallacy.
Multiplier: a buzzword used in government and some businesses to justify socialistic programs.
Multiplication: a binomial operator denoting repetitive addition found in the Real, Full Discrete, and Fractional math Domains.
Multiplicand: one value found on the 'left' side of a multiplication.
Product: the result of a multiplication.
Money velocity is the rate of money moving between transactions. Note: magick multipliers do not increase money velocity. Money velocity is not wealth.
You can't discuss economics with anyone, it seems.
I agree.
^Doesn't think he is a Neanderthal. Also thinks he knows economics.#retard
Lie. You advocate bit government and socialism.No I don't.
It does matter. Socialism is unconstitutional. The government needs to return to the constitution that created and defined it.But it wouldn't matter.
Learn what 'fact' means. It does not mean 'proof' or 'Universal Truth'. Until you figure this word out, avoid using it.Facts exist outside of your distorted partisan view.
Nope. The definition of 'too much' is 'too much', in other words, 'larger than it should be'. Apparently English is not your first language. Perhaps you are speaking Liberal.Your definition of 'too much' is 'more than they take in'.
They spend too much regardless of how much they tax, print, or borrow money.So when they take in enough to cover expenditures, they don't spend too much now, do they?
Inversion fallacy. That would be you.You sure do struggle with really basic concepts.
I do. Did you have a point?
Thanks for confirming my belief.
Polls are meaningless. Quoting secret polls even more so.
Repeating the link doesn't correct the misquote.
Are you effing kidding? A presidents internal polling, the RNC or DNC internal poling are the gold standard of polls. People pay big dollars for these polls.
However, just give us one good poll favoring trump and you will be in heaven.
#retardedAre you effing kidding? A presidents internal polling, the RNC or DNC internal poling are the gold standard of polls. People pay big dollars for these polls.
However, just give us one good poll favoring trump and you will be in heaven.
No mis-quote.Look harder.
Math error: Failure to disclose raw data. Failure to disclose questions. Failure to disclose bias mitigation method. Failure to disclose and justify source of variance. Failure to select by randN. Failure to normalize by paired randU. Failure to calculate margin of error.
I don't care how much people pay for a poll. Strawman fallacy.
I don't have to declare any poll. Attempted force of negative proof fallacy.
You should probably at least go learn something about statistical math.
Just when I begin to think that you cannot be any more FOS than you are already, you prove me wrong, time and again
A lot quicker. Agreed. The slowdown isn't nearly as long as the Great Depression and its effects either, which ran from 1929-1955.The recovery time from the unemployment rate will be a "mite" quicker than the Great Depression though.
Dead right. That's exactly what they are trying to do. The fear mongering by them is unending. It's all they have.The left appears to be trying to slow down re-opening the economy,
Dead right again. The rhetoric that Trump somehow caused the virus or the economic slowdown or that it will be permanent is strong indeed from the Democrats.it sure seems it is because they believe that huge unemployment will help them in the election..
Unemployment Rate Could Rival Great Depression’s, and I couldn't be more delighted.