McCloskey’s Gun Didn’t Work So A Prosecutor Ordered It Reassembled And Then Declared

[Dutch Uncle]

I've had enough, take your stupidity and silly games elsewhere.

Translation: I give up.

Of course you do!

 

[Dutch Uncle]

I'd say they are in contempt of their state constitution. They should be immediately removed.

No shots were fired. There were no injuries. No crime was committed.

Brandishing is a crime in most states.

Most intelligent gun owners know that you don't pull a gun unless you intend to use it and if you use it, shoot to kill. Patricia clearly brandished her pistol by aiming it at the crowd. The way she was holding it, it's a good thing it was misassembled because she could be facing murder charges.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Should never get to a jury,,,and the DA should be charged

Agreed...they'll plead out to a misdemeanor for brandishing. What do you think the DA should be charged with?

 

[volsrock]

Agreed...they'll plead out to a misdemeanor for brandishing. What do you think the DA should be charged with?

Armed Blacks brandishing weapons Stone Mountain



Have they been charged?

 

[Rusty Bell 65]

Brandishing is a crime in most states.

Most intelligent gun owners know that you don't pull a gun unless you intend to use it and if you use it, shoot to kill. Patricia clearly brandished her pistol by aiming it at the crowd. The way she was holding it, it's a good thing it was misassembled because she could be facing murder charges.

Fuck off. Don't reply to me again.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Fuck off. Don't reply to me again.

How much will you pay me to do so? OR you can just put me on ignore and live happily in ignorance of wisdom and truth.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Armed Blacks brandishing weapons Stone Mountain

View attachment 16259

Have they been charged?

Carrying a rifle is not brandishing. From the pictures I've seen, Mark wasn't brandishing his AR-15 but Patricia certainly was brandishing her .380.

Lastly, States Rights. It amazes me how many Neo-Nazi/Alt-Right/Incels hate States Rights. Stone Mountain is in Georgia. St. Louis is in Missouri. Apples and Oranges.

 

[volsrock]

Carrying a rifle is not brandishing. From the pictures I've seen, Mark wasn't brandishing his AR-15 but Patricia certainly was brandishing her .380.

Lastly, States Rights. It amazes me how many Neo-Nazi/Alt-Right/Incels hate States Rights. Stone Mountain is in Georgia. St. Louis is in Missouri. Apples and Oranges.

A .380 with no firing pin.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

A .380 with no firing pin.

Scroll up.

Now tell me you wouldn't shoot a person who pulled a gun on you and threatened to shoot regardless if the gun had a firing pin in it or not.

 

[katzgar]

McCloskey’s Gun Didn’t Work So A Prosecutor Ordered It Reassembled And Then Declared It Lethal

The gun Patricia McCloskey waved at protesters was inoperable when it arrived at the St. Louis police crime lab, but a member of Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner’s staff ordered crime lab experts to disassemble and reassemble it and wrote that it was “readily capable of lethal use” in charging documents filed Monday, 5 On Your Side has learned.

In Missouri, police and prosecutors must prove that a weapon is “readily” capable of lethal use when it is used in the type of crime with which the McCloskeys have been charged.

Assistant Circuit Attorney Chris Hinckley ordered crime lab staff members to field strip the handgun and found it had been assembled incorrectly. Specifically, the firing pin spring was put in front of the firing pin, which was backward, and made the gun incapable of firing, according to documents obtained by 5 On Your Side.

https://hotair.com/archives/john-s-...secutors-ordered-reassembled-declared-lethal/


It should be grounds for dismissing the charges BEFORE it ever gets to trial! And bring the DA, assistant Circuit Atty, and the head of the lab up on tampering with evidence charges NOW.

your point that brandishing a non working gun is stupid is correct

 

[katzgar]

Armed Blacks brandishing weapons Stone Mountain

View attachment 16259

Have they been charged?

self defense is allowed

 

[volsrock]

self defense is allowed

Who was there making threats againts the blacks at Stone Mtn?

 

[Dutch Uncle]

self defense is allowed

So you agree the charges against the McCloskey's are bullshit?.....or do you have a typically Democrat double-standard?

 

[Dutch Uncle]

your point that brandishing a non working gun is stupid is correct

She doesn't appear to have known her pistol was misassembled.

 

[volsrock]

Scroll up.

Now tell me you wouldn't shoot a person who pulled a gun on you and threatened to shoot regardless if the gun had a firing pin in it or not.

If she had a BB Gun it could have done more harm

And u dont shoot people who are brandishing a BB Gun

 

[Nomad]

LOL. How is it tampering with evidence if everyone knows what they did?

If they did it before the public knew about it and with the intention of concealing the fact that it had originally been inoperable before they ordered the police crime lab to alter it, that is obviously tampering with evidence and whoever ordered it done should be held accountable.

 

[katzgar]

So you agree the charges against the McCloskey's are bullshit?.....or do you have a typically Democrat double-standard?

there was no self defense involved. You are confusing self defense with rabid hysteria, they are different

 

[volsrock]

there was no self defense involved. You are confusing self defense with rabid hysteria, they are different

What type of self defense was involved at Stone Mtn

 

[Dutch Uncle]

So the intent to scare of intruders is the problem? Just trying to be clear. I can understand brandishing a gun to commit a crime being illegal, but to use a weapon to defend oneself with an inoperable weapon as a ruse is an entirely different scenario.
What's your thoughts on my point about the scenarios being opposite situations?

It depends upon the state. Brandishing is illegal in most states, including Missouri and Texas.

Responsible gun owners follow this maxim: Never pull a gun unless you intend to use it and if you use it, shoot to kill. She didn't.

 

[Rusty Bell 65]

If they did it before the public knew about it and with the intention of concealing the fact that it had originally been inoperable before they ordered the police crime lab to alter it, that is obviously tampering with evidence and whoever ordered it done should be held accountable.

There was no reason to disassemble it in the first place. It was never fired, and even if it were, they only needed to find the rate of twist (which ALL handguns produced in that model are the same and noted in the instruction manual) and powder residue from both the projectile and bore of the firearm.