The persons Rittenhouse shot were all criminal felons with records...

Interesting that the three people shot by Rittenhouse, the 17 year-old all had serious criminal records.

Joseph Rosenbaum, the first person Rittenhouse shot was seen by numerous people engaged in arson during the riot in question. Rosenbaum is a convicted sex offender.

Then there's Ian Miles Cheong. He's the guy that attacked Rittenhouse with a skateboard. Cheong has numerous previous convictions for assault, threatening with a dangerous weapon, endangerment, domestic abuse (aka wife beater), etc.

EgaR7wcU4AAgGLX


Thug with a skateboard if you will.

His last was Giage "Lefty" Grosskreutz. Grosskreutz pulled a pistol and pointed it at Rittenhouse who then shot and wounded him. Grosskreutz has a prior felony conviction for a burglary so he was in the commission of a felony merely possessing a firearm.

https://www.redstate.com/streiff/20...elons-who-were-shot-while-acting-like-felons/

This isn't a judgement about the validity of Rittenhouse's actions. It is just a note on who the people he shot were (I won't call them victims as two out of three clearly intended by their actions to seriously injure or kill Rittenhouse).


Therefore murder is legal?! Are you nuts.
 
Interesting that the three people shot by Rittenhouse, the 17 year-old all had serious criminal records.

Joseph Rosenbaum, the first person Rittenhouse shot was seen by numerous people engaged in arson during the riot in question. Rosenbaum is a convicted sex offender.

Then there's Ian Miles Cheong. He's the guy that attacked Rittenhouse with a skateboard. Cheong has numerous previous convictions for assault, threatening with a dangerous weapon, endangerment, domestic abuse (aka wife beater), etc.

EgaR7wcU4AAgGLX


Thug with a skateboard if you will.

His last was Giage "Lefty" Grosskreutz. Grosskreutz pulled a pistol and pointed it at Rittenhouse who then shot and wounded him. Grosskreutz has a prior felony conviction for a burglary so he was in the commission of a felony merely possessing a firearm.

https://www.redstate.com/streiff/20...elons-who-were-shot-while-acting-like-felons/

This isn't a judgement about the validity of Rittenhouse's actions. It is just a note on who the people he shot were (I won't call them victims as two out of three clearly intended by their actions to seriously injure or kill Rittenhouse).

The Party of the Jackass loves criminals, idiots and illegals.
 
Interesting that the three people shot by Rittenhouse, the 17 year-old all had serious criminal records.

Joseph Rosenbaum, the first person Rittenhouse shot was seen by numerous people engaged in arson during the riot in question. Rosenbaum is a convicted sex offender.

Then there's Ian Miles Cheong. He's the guy that attacked Rittenhouse with a skateboard. Cheong has numerous previous convictions for assault, threatening with a dangerous weapon, endangerment, domestic abuse (aka wife beater), etc.

EgaR7wcU4AAgGLX


Thug with a skateboard if you will.

His last was Giage "Lefty" Grosskreutz. Grosskreutz pulled a pistol and pointed it at Rittenhouse who then shot and wounded him. Grosskreutz has a prior felony conviction for a burglary so he was in the commission of a felony merely possessing a firearm.

https://www.redstate.com/streiff/20...elons-who-were-shot-while-acting-like-felons/

This isn't a judgement about the validity of Rittenhouse's actions. It is just a note on who the people he shot were (I won't call them victims as two out of three clearly intended by their actions to seriously injure or kill Rittenhouse).

Do you think having a criminal record justifies murder, Senior Chief?
 
If a person is not otherwise prohibited from possessing a firearm, it is legal to carry any legal firearm openly in Wisconsin.

Under Wisconsin statutes that say anyone under 18 who "goes armed" with any deadly weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor. Under that statute Rittenhouse, 17, was not old enough to legally carry the assault-style rifle he had.

But John Monroe, a lawyer who specializes in gun rights cases, believes an exception for rifles and shotguns, intended to allow people age 16 and 17 to hunt, could apply.


https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/crime/2020/08/26/wisconsin-open-carry-law-kyle-rittenhouse-legally-have-gun-kenosha-protest-shooting-17-year-old/3444231001/

That's a good one. Rittenhouse isn't guilty of a illegally carrying a gun because he carried it to a BLM rally in order to hunt.
Does Wisconsin have a BLM hunting season that requires a license or is anyone allowed to shoot BLM protestors at any time?
 
That's a good one. Rittenhouse isn't guilty of a illegally carrying a gun because he carried it to a BLM rally in order to hunt.
Does Wisconsin have a BLM hunting season that requires a license or is anyone allowed to shoot BLM protestors at any time?

Absurdity; a sure sign of the last desperate refuge for liars, fools and ignorance; and those who have lost their arguments.

You should kill yourself. You're a worthless piece of human filth. You'll always be a worthless piece of human filth. You're a moron. You will always be a moron. No one will miss you. No one would care. The worlds collective IQ would increase and it would save the valuable oxygen you waste with every breath.
 
If this goes the way I hope it does, I am going to be happier than Grind was when Zimmermann was acquitted.
Doubtful this will go away. Zimmerman was a classic self-defense case. Rittenhouse fired into a crowd. Three people shot, two dead. I strongly doubt all three can be filed under "self-defense". Even if the video evidence clears him of each shooting, the mere act of firing into a crowd falls under reckless endangerment, illegal discharge of a weapon and who knows what else.
 
This is similar to the Jacob Blake case where you made up lies about Blake. Blake was never even accused of sexual assaulting a child, much less convicted of it like you lied. Can trump say the same?

Then there's Ian Miles Cheong. He's the guy that attacked Rittenhouse with a skateboard.

Anthony Huber was the name of the guy who used a skateboard to hit Rittenhouse. I do not know where you got the name Ian Miles Cheong. Cheong is a foreign con artist who produces fake articles for the Alt Right. His actions are online, and on the side of the Alt Right.

Grosskreutz has a prior felony conviction for a burglary so he was in the commission of a felony merely possessing a firearm.

Again with the lies. Grosskreutz has no felony convictions. He has a concealed carry permit, and was legally carrying a gun. Rittenhouse was not legally carrying a gun.
 
Then there's Grosskreutz. He was illegally carrying a concealed pistol and drew it and pointed it at Rittenhouse. That's clearly self defense. I'd be very surprised if Grosskreutz didn't get charged with felonies either by the state or feds. If the feds nail him he's looking at 10 to 20 in prison.

Grosskreutz as no felony convictions, and a concealed carry permit, so there is no felony. Rittenhouse shot at Grosskreutz before he drew his gun, so Grosskreutz has a great self defense case. Rittenhouse was illegally carry a gun, and firing at random people.

That Cheong

Once again, "that Cheong" was not even within the borders of the USA when this all happened. I will not defend him too much, because he is an Alt Right propagandist, but he did not interact with Rittenhouse. It is unclear which country "that Cheong" lives in, but it is not the USA.
 
Absurdity; a sure sign of the last desperate refuge for liars, fools and ignorance; and those who have lost their arguments.

You should kill yourself. You're a worthless piece of human filth. You'll always be a worthless piece of human filth. You're a moron. You will always be a moron. No one will miss you. No one would care. The worlds collective IQ would increase and it would save the valuable oxygen you waste with every breath.

Yes, it was absurd to claim Rittenhouse is allowed to carry a gun to a BLM protest under Wisconsin hunting laws. Good to see you finally caught onto that absurdity.
 
Grosskreutz, the fake ass medic, absolutely deserves to be charged...and convicted...and executed.

To charge Grosskreutz with anything, you need evidence. He was legally carrying a gun, which he only drew after being attacked with deadly force. That is the very definition of self defense. Rittenhouse was using deadly force against Grosskreutz when Grosskreutz drew his gun.
 
Back
Top